Page 7 of 29 [ 458 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 29  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2011, 10:02 pm

Fnord wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I see more of conservative vindictiveness in these so called reforms, based on the assumption that the poor are getting a free ride.

Well then, propose an alternative. I hope it will be one that would guarantee that when a person is able to work, that he or she is put to work. Otherwise, capable people will just collect their hand-outs on a monthly basis without ever being productive. There just seems to be something ethically or morally wrong with such a practice - it is too analogous to parisitism.

No, I am not slamming those who are willing, but unable to work due to some disability or handicap. I am expressing contempt for those who are fully capable of working, and who believe that it is both ethical and moral to take without giving - a non quid pro quo arrangement, as it were.


You do know that people don't get on disability immediately, just by applying for it. An applicant normally has to have his or her condition confirmed by a doctor. Then, a review board, along with a state doctor of psychiatrist has to either validate - or deny - the claim. So, the notion that widespread abuse of disability benefits exists is only a myth, as more people are denied claims than are accepted. But that doesn't fit with the right's official story of poor people ripping off the rich

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

13 Aug 2011, 10:11 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I see more of conservative vindictiveness in these so called reforms, based on the assumption that the poor are getting a free ride.

Well then, propose an alternative. I hope it will be one that would guarantee that when a person is able to work, that he or she is put to work. Otherwise, capable people will just collect their hand-outs on a monthly basis without ever being productive. There just seems to be something ethically or morally wrong with such a practice - it is too analogous to parisitism.

No, I am not slamming those who are willing, but unable to work due to some disability or handicap. I am expressing contempt for those who are fully capable of working, and who believe that it is both ethical and moral to take without giving - a non quid pro quo arrangement, as it were.

You do know that people don't get on disability immediately...

I was referring more to those people who are on Unemployment or Welfare than to those on Disability - of course a disabled person should have recourse to public aid! It isn't just "The Right" that tells stories of poor people ripping off the rich. Some of us have actually witnessed it, and listened to those same poor people bragging about how they pulled off yet another scam on "The Man".

Such as back when I was homeless.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm

Fnord wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I see more of conservative vindictiveness in these so called reforms, based on the assumption that the poor are getting a free ride.

Well then, propose an alternative. I hope it will be one that would guarantee that when a person is able to work, that he or she is put to work. Otherwise, capable people will just collect their hand-outs on a monthly basis without ever being productive. There just seems to be something ethically or morally wrong with such a practice - it is too analogous to parisitism.

No, I am not slamming those who are willing, but unable to work due to some disability or handicap. I am expressing contempt for those who are fully capable of working, and who believe that it is both ethical and moral to take without giving - a non quid pro quo arrangement, as it were.

You do know that people don't get on disability immediately...

I was referring more to those people who are on Unemployment or Welfare than to those on Disability - of course a disabled person should have recourse to public aid! It isn't just "The Right" that tells stories of poor people ripping off the rich. Some of us have actually witnessed it, and listened to those same poor people bragging about how they pulled off yet another scam on "The Man".

Such as back when I was homeless.


Well, I'm glad that you're not homeless anymore. My wife had been homeless for a short while, years before we had met, and from the fact that she often still talks about it tells me that such an experience must truly have been traumatic for her.
As for poor people screwing over "the man," we all know it happens, but not nearly as often as people like to believe.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

13 Aug 2011, 10:26 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

Quote:
In my opinion though, those found to be ablest bodied to work by the most hard hearted conservatives may in fact not be able bodied - or may in fact have a psychological or developmental disorder. Right wing politics have become so intertwined in plans to sort "the wheat from the shaft," that virtually no one's benefits would be safe. Scott Walker's plans for drug testing the recipients of benefits in Florida is actually driven more by politics than it is in the name of law and order. I see more of conservative vindictiveness in these so called reforms, based on the assumption that the poor are getting a free ride.


It’s “wheat from the chaff”, not “wheat from the shaft”.
Just thought I’d point that out………..

Raptor
A hard hearted conservative.
:twisted:



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

13 Aug 2011, 10:32 pm

You're thinking of Rick Scott not Scott Walker.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2011, 10:38 pm

Jacoby wrote:
You're thinking of Rick Scott not Scott Walker.


Sorry, I had a brain fart, getting two similar names mixed up. The Florida governor was hardly the main focus of my post, just an example I was using.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

13 Aug 2011, 10:40 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Well, I'm glad that you're not homeless anymore. My wife had been homeless for a short while, years before we had met, and from the fact that she often still talks about it tells me that such an experience must truly have been traumatic for her.

Best wishes to your wife! It's losing every form of security you ever thought you had - complete abandonment by friends, family, and relatives. My heart (and financial support) goes out to victims of disasters like Katrina and the Fukusaki earthquake and tsunami, because of what I remember from that time.
Kraichgauer wrote:
As for poor people screwing over "the man," we all know it happens, but not nearly as often as people like to believe.

Maybe ... it does happen often enough to result in about a thousand or so anonymous tips per month to law-enforcement. The Los Angeles Times reported in 2010 that about twenty-four percent of new welfare applications in San Diego County were based on some form of deliberate fraud. However, this statistic may actually be lower. The US Department of Labor reported that 1.9% of the total Unemployment Insurance payments for 2001 was attributable to fraud or abuse within the UI program. The Department of Labor expects that as many as 40 states will require federal loans in fiscal 2013, with borrowing totaling $93 billion. This translates into $1,767,000,000

(I'm sorry for the mis-match in years, but it's the best I can do on short notice.)

Even if the actual amount was half of this value, that's still about $500,000,000 that could have gone toward education, infrastructure, public safety, and the like.

The percentage of fraud may seem small, but when translated into dollars ... :cry:


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2011, 10:41 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Quote:
In my opinion though, those found to be ablest bodied to work by the most hard hearted conservatives may in fact not be able bodied - or may in fact have a psychological or developmental disorder. Right wing politics have become so intertwined in plans to sort "the wheat from the shaft," that virtually no one's benefits would be safe. Scott Walker's plans for drug testing the recipients of benefits in Florida is actually driven more by politics than it is in the name of law and order. I see more of conservative vindictiveness in these so called reforms, based on the assumption that the poor are getting a free ride.


It’s “wheat from the chaff”, not “wheat from the shaft”.
Just thought I’d point that out………..

Raptor
A hard hearted conservative.
:twisted:


Being that you're obviously versed in the bible enough to correct me on chaff and wheat, how is it you can take pride in being a hard hearted conservative?

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

13 Aug 2011, 10:48 pm

"His winnowing fork is in his hand, and He will clear his threshing floor, gathering His wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire." -- Matthew 3:12 (NIV)

Not exactly a biblical quote ... now I'm lost ... how does this refer back to the topic at hand?

Kraichgauer wrote:
"Right wing politics have become so intertwined in plans to sort "the wheat from the shaft," that virtually no one's benefits would be safe."


Oh yeah! Thanks!


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2011, 10:49 pm

Fnord wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Well, I'm glad that you're not homeless anymore. My wife had been homeless for a short while, years before we had met, and from the fact that she often still talks about it tells me that such an experience must truly have been traumatic for her.

Best wishes to your wife! It's losing every form of security you ever thought you had - complete abandonment by friends, family, and relatives. My heart (and financial support) goes out to victims of disasters like Katrina and the Fukusaki earthquake and tsunami, because of what I remember from that time.
Kraichgauer wrote:
As for poor people screwing over "the man," we all know it happens, but not nearly as often as people like to believe.

Maybe ... it does happen often enough to result in about a thousand or so anonymous tips per month to law-enforcement. The Los Angeles Times reported in 2010 that about twenty-four percent of new welfare applications in San Diego County were based on some form of deliberate fraud. However, this statistic may actually be lower. The US Department of Labor reported that 1.9% of the total Unemployment Insurance payments for 2001 was attributable to fraud or abuse within the UI program. The Department of Labor expects that as many as 40 states will require federal loans in fiscal 2013, with borrowing totaling $93 billion. This translates into $1,767,000,000

(I'm sorry for the mis-match in years, but it's the best I can do on short notice.)

Even if the actual amount was half of this value, that's still about $500,000,000 that could have gone toward education, infrastructure, public safety, and the like.

The percentage of fraud may seem small, but when translated into dollars ... :cry:


My wife had been kicked out of her home by her first husband - who had been cheating on her! She had to live in a homeless shelter for a time, and became dependent on people who she thought were friends, but were anything but. Luckily, she got back on her feet, and I met her soon after.
As for the seemingly vast numbers of people committing welfare fraud - well, just think of the many more people who actually have legitimate claims. I would think they far outnumber the liars and cheaters.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,695
Location: Houston, Texas

13 Aug 2011, 10:50 pm

How can anyone with AS be a conservative? The same reasons that an NT can be one. Aspies have the right to believe in free-market economics and oppose abortion, same-sex marriage, etc.

I am neither conservative nor liberal. I feel that rather than having one big, sometimes Big Brother-ish entity, we should basically have numerous, smaller entities. Ideally, I would like to see each of us practically govern ourselves as much as possible, as independently from the government as possible (although I know that isn't possible for everybody).



Last edited by Tim_Tex on 13 Aug 2011, 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

13 Aug 2011, 10:54 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
How can anyone with AS be a conservative? The same reasons that an NT can be one.

Lack of empathy (ruveyn) and brains (rather not say) ;)



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

13 Aug 2011, 11:13 pm

blunnet wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
How can anyone with AS be a conservative? The same reasons that an NT can be one.

Lack of empathy (ruveyn) and brains (rather not say) ;)


:roll:

Yeah liberals are generous to the poor with other people's money, sorry but that's not compassion, that's stealing.

Conservatives are generous to the poor with their own money, which they choose to donate, that is real compassion.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

13 Aug 2011, 11:17 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
My wife had been kicked out of her home by her first husband - who had been cheating on her! She had to live in a homeless shelter for a time, and became dependent on people who she thought were friends, but were anything but. Luckily, she got back on her feet, and I met her soon after.

Weird ... her experience seems to mirror mine, with the only exceptions that I never got into a shelter and never met you.
Kraichgauer wrote:
As for the seemingly vast numbers of people committing welfare fraud - well, just think of the many more people who actually have legitimate claims. I would think they far outnumber the liars and cheaters.

Yeah, but ... five hundred-million dollars!! ! How many inoculations could that pay for? How much food? Or single-family dwellings? Like I said, it isn't so much the percentage that matters (to me, anyway), but the actual dollar amount that gets wasted.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2011, 11:23 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
blunnet wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
How can anyone with AS be a conservative? The same reasons that an NT can be one.

Lack of empathy (ruveyn) and brains (rather not say) ;)


:roll:

Yeah liberals are generous to the poor with other people's money, sorry but that's not compassion, that's stealing.

Conservatives are generous to the poor with their own money, which they choose to donate, that is real compassion.


Taxation is theft, huh? So, the Pentagon is stealing people's money for national defense by your way of thinking. I know your answer, so I'll say it for you: no, it isn't. But neither are social programs that are financed by taxation, as there is a legitimate national interest at hand.
And by the way, no matter how much wealthy individuals give to charity, there are limits, and so someone - a lot of someones most likely - will be left out. Programs financed by regular taxation will always be able to serve the public.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

13 Aug 2011, 11:25 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
blunnet wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
How can anyone with AS be a conservative? The same reasons that an NT can be one.

Lack of empathy (ruveyn) and brains (rather not say) ;)


:roll:

Yeah liberals are generous to the poor with other people's money, sorry but that's not compassion, that's stealing.

Conservatives are generous to the poor with their own money, which they choose to donate, that is real compassion.


Taxation is theft, huh? So, the Pentagon is stealing people's money for national defense by your way of thinking. I know your answer, so I'll say it for you: no, it isn't. But neither are social programs that are financed by taxation, as there is a legitimate national interest at hand.


National Defense is a responsibility of the Federal Government and a legitimate item to collect taxes on.

Kraichgauer wrote:
And by the way, no matter how much wealthy individuals give to charity, there are limits, and so someone - a lot of someones most likely - will be left out. Programs financed by regular taxation will always be able to serve the public.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Yes we saw how effective the emergency agencies ran by the Federal Government were in the Gulf Oil Spill, they were actually interfering with clean up operations, not helping.