Why don't the faithful hold God morally accountable?

Post Reply New Topic

Personally, I've always wondered why there is so much anger against God from non-believers in Him, yet they have absolutely zero problem with Satan. Satan and his angels, whether you believe in him/them or not, are the primary influences toward pain and suffering in this world. So, non-believers in him not even having a theoretical problem with Satan always strikes me as interesting, particularly when I hear so much vitriol uttered against God by the same people. I could pick from so many examples, but Richard Dawkins comes first to my mind: “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” It is exceedingly rare -- if not without parallel -- for a fictional character to inspire such a level of feeling.
I've never heard Satan even described as, say, "bad" by a non-believer. It's just really interesting to me. The author of the Holocaust and all other pain, suffering, and death, not considered even "bad". But God, the creator of us all, and the giver of life (air, food, water, etc, etc, etc, etc) to us all, who expects simple obedience and respect, He's called vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, and capriciously malevolent.

I'm not confused by this at all, but on the surface it is quite odd. And it is an incorrect reaction by them, to be sure, even though it's understandable.

Christianity is inherently dualistic. Yes they believe in an all powerful, all knowing, loving God. Yet in christian theology God clearly has a rival and an equal adversary whom they call Satan. Zoroastrianism is very much the same way. An antediluvian supergod split into 2 equal and opposite beings: Ahura Mazda the good god, and Ahriman the evil god. Satan, for some reason, is associated in american christian mythology with rebellion against authority.

Not equal. Satan is just being given enough rope to hang himself as it were,

But why, theologically speaking, is he being permitted to crap all over Earth while he does so? I mean, surely an omnipotent deity can lock a freakin' door to the Pit, yes?

Addressing your earlier point about God permitting Man to kill him, I will say again: I find that viewpoint to be refreshing and interesting, but I still have to wonder: does God's status as an eternal being factor into that at all, theologically speaking? If He can never truly die, how much does one death mean to Him? And how much does it really mean when it comes to paying back His sins against others? Admittedly, letting gentiles into the Kingdom was also a pretty massive change in His foreign policy, but for a being that will last eternally no matter how many times He 'dies', I have trouble accepting a single death as sufficient atonement - or even appropriate atonement, really. Why not, I dunno, give those He condemned in the past a second chance? Destroy/lock up Satan? Undo His curse of death? The possibilities are literally mind-boggling when you consider the scale upon which this being is supposed to exist - and yet he chose to die, rather than apply some of His infinite wisdom and might to solving any of the fundamental problems (poverty, ignorance, oppression, lack of resources) that caused and continue to cause sin.

I appreciate that you can see something more here. I am going to think about this, and other queries you've asked. I'll try to explain my understanding in a way that's an interesting read..

Well, the reason put as simply as possible is that He's God. He is above morality. No created being is above morality, but the uncreated Creator is. Created beings are, as created beings, "under" certain requirements by their creator. But who puts the eternal, unmade God under anything? Seriously! It makes perfect sense to me that He is accountable to no one. Note the silliness of the following statement: "C'mon, God, if we have to follow the rules, so do you." A person that would utter that sentence needs his or her head examined if they think the sentence makes real sense.

Yeah, someone needs to have their head examined alright... Do you hear what you're saying? "Uncreated Creator." Really?

1.) eternal punishments for finite transgressions,

2.) slaughter in response to relatively small provocation,

23 Then he went up from there to Bethel; and as he was going up by the way, young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, “Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!” 24 When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 25 And he went from there to Mount Carmel, and from there he returned to Samaria.

3.) commanding his followers to murder gentiles in order to steal and/or rape their women),

7 "How can we provide wives for those who are left, since we have taken an oath by the LORD not to give them any of our daughters in marriage?" 8 Then they asked, "Which one of the tribes of Israel failed to assemble before the LORD at Mizpah?" They discovered that no one from Jabesh Gilead had come to the camp for the assembly. 9 For when they counted the people, they found that none of the people of Jabesh Gilead were there. 10 So the assembly sent twelve thousand fighting men with instructions to go to Jabesh Gilead and put to the sword those living there, including the women and children. 11 "This is what you are to do," they said. "Kill every male and every woman who is not a virgin." 12 They found among the people living in Jabesh Gilead four hundred young women who had never slept with a man, and they took them to the camp at Shiloh in Canaan. 13 Then the whole assembly sent an offer of peace to the Benjamites at the rock of Rimmon. 14 So the Benjamites returned at that time and were given the women of Jabesh Gilead who had been spared. But there were not enough for all of them. 15 The people grieved for Benjamin, because the LORD had made a gap in the tribes of Israel. 16 And the elders of the assembly said, "With the women of Benjamin destroyed, how shall we provide wives for the men who are left? 17 The Benjamite survivors must have heirs," they said, "so that a tribe of Israel will not be wiped out. 18 We can't give them our daughters as wives, since we Israelites have taken this oath: 'Cursed be anyone who gives a wife to a Benjamite.' 19 But look, there is the annual festival of the LORD in Shiloh, to the north of Bethel, and east of the road that goes from Bethel to Shechem, and to the south of Lebonah." 20 So they instructed the Benjamites, saying, "Go and hide in the vineyards 21 and watch. When the girls of Shiloh come out to join in the dancing, then rush from the vineyards and each of you seize a wife from the girls of Shiloh and go to the land of Benjamin. 22 When their fathers or brothers complain to us, we will say to them, 'Do us a kindness by helping them, because we did not get wives for them during the war, and you are innocent, since you did not give your daughters to them.' " 23 So that is what the Benjamites did. While the girls were dancing, each man caught one and carried her off to be his wife. Then they returned to their inheritance and rebuilt the towns and settled in them.

4.) unmerciful (creation of suffering in response to original sin, death/hell in general) or just straight up immoral

I do find t interesting that the non theists want theists to hold God morally accountable that the non thiests have no belief in
The reason we don't is because he is God it's that simple.

More than a thousand years poured into the refinement of theological thought have clearly been wasted. The great Christian thinkers of the Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformation must be turning in their graves.

Like I said before, I'm here (in this thread) trying to understand how the faithful think. It's a fair question. I'm just kinda depressed that most folks answer, "Well, because he's God," since that response indicates a complete and total failure to think whatsoever.

More than a thousand years poured into the refinement of theological thought have clearly been wasted. The great Christian thinkers of the Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformation must be turning in their graves...

I wonder if that spinning could be harnessed as a potential energy source.

e's God," since that response indicates a complete and total failure to think whatsoever.

I can put it this way the faithful views God as loving and vengful he does things that not even those who whorship him will understand.
I can understand why the non religious would be curious and the theists are just as curisous as to why they don't believe in God.
To me God is absolute authority I follow his laws because I both love and fear him.

And your right about the great christian thinkers of the Catholic Church and the Protestant Refomration would be turning in their graves because their was much more understanding and at that time the religious kept their faith to themselfs as a community.