Should interracial marriages be promoted?
Ancalagon wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
with a brain size larger than modern mans I think they could hold their own.
1) I don't believe you can predict intelligence purely from brain size.
Quote:
My point was semantic if H. neanderthalensis survived to the modern era we would see them as modern humans. Not all of us of course but folks who are not racist.
I think they would be categorized as a different species of humans. And I think that labeling anyone who might possibly disagree with you over a matter with relatively little evidence as 'racist' is quite silly.
1) Relative brain size actually a fairly good guide within primates even better within the apes.
I think tool manufacture, indications of ritual behavior etc. are there as well.
Amounts are hard to judge the Goshute in the great basin or some of the Australian indigenous have very little material culture but are still quite human.
2) Who did I call racist the hypothetical people in my hypothetical construction?
How rude of me maybe I should dream them up and apologize to them.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
1) Relative brain size actually a fairly good guide within primates even better within the apes.
I'm not disputing that it's a fairly good rough guide. I don't think it's accurate enough to lead by itself to a conclusion that Neanderthals must have been as smart or smarter than us.
Quote:
I think tool manufacture, indications of ritual behavior etc. are there as well.
Amounts are hard to judge the Goshute in the great basin or some of the Australian indigenous have very little material culture but are still quite human.
Amounts are hard to judge the Goshute in the great basin or some of the Australian indigenous have very little material culture but are still quite human.
I think the amount of material isn't the best measure. A better measure would be sophistication. Everything I've ever heard about Neanderthal toolmaking says that theirs were significantly less sophisticated than modern humans' at the same time. I don't know about the Goshute or the Australian natives, but if their tools are similarly primitive, it might lend some weight to your theory.
I think they probably do have sophisticated tools, and I bet they have art, too.
Quote:
2) Who did I call racist the hypothetical people in my hypothetical construction?
How rude of me maybe I should dream them up and apologize to them.
How rude of me maybe I should dream them up and apologize to them.
If you weren't trying to make any implications about people in this universe, then never mind.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
Ancalagon wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
1) Relative brain size actually a fairly good guide within primates even better within the apes.
I'm not disputing that it's a fairly good rough guide. I don't think it's accurate enough to lead by itself to a conclusion that Neanderthals must have been as smart or smarter than us.
Quote:
I think tool manufacture, indications of ritual behavior etc. are there as well.
Amounts are hard to judge the Goshute in the great basin or some of the Australian indigenous have very little material culture but are still quite human.
Amounts are hard to judge the Goshute in the great basin or some of the Australian indigenous have very little material culture but are still quite human.
I think the amount of material isn't the best measure. A better measure would be sophistication. Everything I've ever heard about Neanderthal toolmaking says that theirs were significantly less sophisticated than modern humans' at the same time. I don't know about the Goshute or the Australian natives, but if their tools are similarly primitive, it might lend some weight to your theory.
I think they probably do have sophisticated tools, and I bet they have art, too.
Quote:
2) Who did I call racist the hypothetical people in my hypothetical construction?
How rude of me maybe I should dream them up and apologize to them.
How rude of me maybe I should dream them up and apologize to them.
If you weren't trying to make any implications about people in this universe, then never mind.
Totally off topic and bound to get me in trouble but I adore G.K. Chesterton even though he is racist as hell.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Totally off topic and bound to get me in trouble but I adore G.K. Chesterton even though he is racist as hell.
He's also pro-Catholic and anti-Protestant, which doesn't entirely sit well with me (being a Protestant). But he's still awesome.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
Kraichgauer wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I can still remember back when I was in college when the consensus was that Neanderthals were sub-human creatures who couldn't compete with us modern ubermenchen.
My anthropology professor had had enough sense to disregard that foolishness.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
My anthropology professor had had enough sense to disregard that foolishness.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Why are the Neanderthals no longer around?
ruveyn
Look in the mirror, and a little piece of Neanderthal ancestry will look back at you.
Modern Homo Sapiens very probably came to outnumber the small Neanderthal population, and simply absorbed those who might have survived being bred out or purposefully murdered (which seems to be a failing of us humans).
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
I am talking about full blood Neanderthals with barrel chests, short legs, elongated skulls and arms twice as thick as yours or mine. I am talking about the Neanderthals who never produced any artwork. Where did they go and if they are gone, then why?
ruveyn
If you can locate one, I think the scientific community would be salivating with glee.
As for the charge that they had never produced any art work - while that has been the standard pitch by anthropologists and archaeologists, I recently saw an article in a science magazine (I'm afraid I don't recall the name) that argued some cave paintings and jewelry seems to predate the arrival of modern humans, and could possibly be attributed to Neanderthals.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
It was cave paintings, which were dated using a fairly novel method; the new date put them right about at the proposed date for the transition from H.neanderthalensis to H. sapiens, meaning that they could still be early H. sapiens works. They were fairly primitive pieces: hand prints and sprays of color, that sort of thing.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
LKL wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I can still remember back when I was in college when the consensus was that Neanderthals were sub-human creatures who couldn't compete with us modern ubermenchen.
My anthropology professor had had enough sense to disregard that foolishness.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
My anthropology professor had had enough sense to disregard that foolishness.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Why are the Neanderthals no longer around?
ruveyn
Look in the mirror, and a little piece of Neanderthal ancestry will look back at you.
Modern Homo Sapiens very probably came to outnumber the small Neanderthal population, and simply absorbed those who might have survived being bred out or purposefully murdered (which seems to be a failing of us humans).
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
I am talking about full blood Neanderthals with barrel chests, short legs, elongated skulls and arms twice as thick as yours or mine. I am talking about the Neanderthals who never produced any artwork. Where did they go and if they are gone, then why?
ruveyn
If you can locate one, I think the scientific community would be salivating with glee.
As for the charge that they had never produced any art work - while that has been the standard pitch by anthropologists and archaeologists, I recently saw an article in a science magazine (I'm afraid I don't recall the name) that argued some cave paintings and jewelry seems to predate the arrival of modern humans, and could possibly be attributed to Neanderthals.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
It was cave paintings, which were dated using a fairly novel method; the new date put them right about at the proposed date for the transition from H.neanderthalensis to H. sapiens, meaning that they could still be early H. sapiens works. They were fairly primitive pieces: hand prints and sprays of color, that sort of thing.
Transition from Neanderthals to Homo Sapiens?
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
Transition from Neanderthals to Homo Sapiens?
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
Transition as in when modern humans replaced Neanderthals.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Ancalagon wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Transition from Neanderthals to Homo Sapiens?
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
Transition as in when modern humans replaced Neanderthals.
Oh, okay; I gotcha.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Ancalagon wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Totally off topic and bound to get me in trouble but I adore G.K. Chesterton even though he is racist as hell.
He's also pro-Catholic and anti-Protestant, which doesn't entirely sit well with me (being a Protestant). But he's still awesome.
If you have read the Father Brown mysteries he pretty much solves crime through racism.
Although in the Quick one he does not pin it on the Islamic dude but he does take a paragraphs to praise the bigot.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Ancalagon wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Transition from Neanderthals to Homo Sapiens?
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
Transition as in when modern humans replaced Neanderthals.
Yes.
LKL wrote:
Ancalagon wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Transition from Neanderthals to Homo Sapiens?
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
I'm more of a believer in the theory that modern humans had arrived in Europe to replace Neanderthals, rather than Neanderthals having evolved into modern humans.
Transition as in when modern humans replaced Neanderthals.
Yes.
<<neanderthal jewerly fashion seashells>>

Quote:
This decorative shell likely adorned the neck of a Neanderthal around 50,000 years ago.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
But possibly did not mix with Homo sapiens.
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt207073.html
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Here is an interesting Pew Research Center report on interracial marriages
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/ ... arriage/1/
And, a Huffington Post synopsis
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/1 ... ifferences
Quote:
white/Asian newlyweds of 2008 through 2010 have significantly higher median combined annual earnings ($70,952) than do any other pairing, including both white/white ($60,000) and Asian/Asian ($62,000). When it comes to educational characteristics, more than half of white newlyweds who marry Asians have a college degree, compared with roughly a third of white newlyweds who married whites. Among Hispanics and blacks, newlyweds who married whites tend to have higher educational attainment than do those who married within their own racial or ethnic group.
It looks like people with higher educational attainment are more likely to marry outside their race.
