22 May 2013, 12:05 pm
Tyri0n
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
22 May 2013, 12:23 pm
22 May 2013, 12:49 pm
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,459
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
22 May 2013, 1:45 pm
22 May 2013, 2:05 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Geekonychus wrote:
What planet do you live on? Body image standards are FAR harsher for women.
By FAR?
I don't think so, the media makes it sound so but both genders are almost equally harsh on each other when it comes to looks.
Three words: Male Hair Loss.
I'd say the ladies are harsher on themselves, judging each other by each other all day long - it's little wonder some of them are almost driven mad from body issues.
We men do this to each other too, but the "minimum" seems to be a lot easier to obtain... heavy testosterone, a cool car, a decent job and not being fat (generally just not being a "loser") seems to be enough for both each other and to attract mates.
Too bad we can't convince the gals that they're harsher judges of their bodies than men generally are! I had a few female friends I wanted to shake vigorously while screaming, "YES YOU ARE ATTRACTIVE, DAMMIT! NOW STOP BEING PARANOID ABOUT IT!! !"
...um.... on that thought, I'd better go get some exercise. *pokes tummy*poke*poke*jiggle*
22 May 2013, 2:55 pm
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?His bolded point in particular was spot on. Times change and societies evolve. The people who seek to undermine feminism (or gay rights, racial equality or any other civil rights issue for that matter) are merely unwilling or unable to adapt.
Take the serial sexual harrasser types......... They keep finding themselves in trouble because they stubbornly cling to these 1950s ideals about the roles of women. That is the root issue for these MRA reactivists. They see themselves as victims because they feel feminism has taken away thier rights to be "real men."
22 May 2013, 5:02 pm
22 May 2013, 5:12 pm
22 May 2013, 7:22 pm
I agree with what you're saying, Tyri0n, but it's pointless to talk about it here. There are so many self-pitying, ex-wife-blaming, mom-blaming, girl-who-doesn't-date-them blaming whiny people here. They have absolutely no introspection and it's like arguing with a small child. Hating/blaming women is all they'll ever know.
But they're the ones who have to live in their misery, so it's not like you should even care that they are so, so wrong. 
_________________
http://www.facebook.com/eidetic.onus
http://eidetic-onus.tumblr.com/
Warning, my tumblr is a man-free zone
Tyri0n
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
22 May 2013, 7:30 pm
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?I am tired of being shut down with people's unverifiable personal stories or experiences. It's interesting how religious extremists do the same thing; well, "God healed me from [...] when I [...] so therefore..." An actual rapist/harasser who deserves prison would probably not say anything all that different than what some people here have said. Few are in the wrong in their own minds, and some learn what constitutes "rape" or "harassment" the hard way due to ignorance.
So instead of arguing with personal stories, it's better to argue with facts that are available to all of us, like I am. I have cited multiple indisputable, quantitative facts and can easily back almost all of them up. They have been rebutted with sad personal stories that could very well be the edited versions of experiences by actual rapists/criminals/harassers. There is no way to know for sure. But if a rapist got on this board, he/she would probably say something quite similar.
22 May 2013, 7:46 pm
Tyri0n wrote:
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?I am tired of being shut down with people's unverifiable personal stories or experiences. It's interesting how religious extremists do the same thing; well, "God healed me from [...] when I [...] so therefore..." An actual rapist/harasser who deserves prison would probably not say anything all that different than what some people here have said. Few are in the wrong in their own minds, and some learn what constitutes "rape" or "harassment" the hard way due to ignorance.
So instead of arguing with personal stories, it's better to argue with facts that are available to all of us, like I am. I have cited multiple indisputable, quantitative facts and can easily back almost all of them up. They have been rebutted with sad personal stories that could very well be the edited versions of experiences by actual rapists/criminals/harassers. There is no way to know for sure. But if a rapist got on this board, he/she would probably say something quite similar.
Facts can be proven wrong. Your facts are disprovable my the simplest of confirmed occurrences of a happy marriage, why fool yourself?
I like you better when you give dating advice, not argue with people who value the traditional way of life. If it makes them happy, you shouldn't be so quick to judge. Are you angry in particular this month trion? You were happier earlier in the year.
22 May 2013, 7:48 pm
The plural of anecdote... is not 'data'... unless you're on WP, then of course it is.
_________________
http://www.facebook.com/eidetic.onus
http://eidetic-onus.tumblr.com/
Warning, my tumblr is a man-free zone
Tyri0n
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
22 May 2013, 7:49 pm
appletheclown wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?I am tired of being shut down with people's unverifiable personal stories or experiences. It's interesting how religious extremists do the same thing; well, "God healed me from [...] when I [...] so therefore..." An actual rapist/harasser who deserves prison would probably not say anything all that different than what some people here have said. Few are in the wrong in their own minds, and some learn what constitutes "rape" or "harassment" the hard way due to ignorance.
So instead of arguing with personal stories, it's better to argue with facts that are available to all of us, like I am. I have cited multiple indisputable, quantitative facts and can easily back almost all of them up. They have been rebutted with sad personal stories that could very well be the edited versions of experiences by actual rapists/criminals/harassers. There is no way to know for sure. But if a rapist got on this board, he/she would probably say something quite similar.
Facts can be proven wrong. Your facts are disprovable my the simplest of confirmed occurrences of a happy marriage, why fool yourself?
I like you better when you give dating advice, not argue with people who value the traditional way of life. If it makes them happy, you shouldn't be so quick to judge. Are you angry in particular this month trion? You were happier earlier in the year.
Yeah, definitely a rough time. But I am not talking about anyone's traditional values or the traditional way of life here.
22 May 2013, 8:25 pm
Tyri0n wrote:
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?I am tired of being shut down with people's unverifiable personal stories or experiences. It's interesting how religious extremists do the same thing; well, "God healed me from [...] when I [...] so therefore..." An actual rapist/harasser who deserves prison would probably not say anything all that different than what some people here have said. Few are in the wrong in their own minds, and some learn what constitutes "rape" or "harassment" the hard way due to ignorance.
So instead of arguing with personal stories, it's better to argue with facts that are available to all of us, like I am. I have cited multiple indisputable, quantitative facts and can easily back almost all of them up. They have been rebutted with sad personal stories that could very well be the edited versions of experiences by actual rapists/criminals/harassers. There is no way to know for sure. But if a rapist got on this board, he/she would probably say something quite similar.
The thing is you really have no idea with regard to specific people on this message board. False accusations do happen. I think this thread is destined to go to straight to hell the direction you're taking it.
22 May 2013, 8:49 pm
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?I am tired of being shut down with people's unverifiable personal stories or experiences. It's interesting how religious extremists do the same thing; well, "God healed me from [...] when I [...] so therefore..." An actual rapist/harasser who deserves prison would probably not say anything all that different than what some people here have said. Few are in the wrong in their own minds, and some learn what constitutes "rape" or "harassment" the hard way due to ignorance.
So instead of arguing with personal stories, it's better to argue with facts that are available to all of us, like I am. I have cited multiple indisputable, quantitative facts and can easily back almost all of them up. They have been rebutted with sad personal stories that could very well be the edited versions of experiences by actual rapists/criminals/harassers. There is no way to know for sure. But if a rapist got on this board, he/she would probably say something quite similar.
The thing is you really have no idea with regard to specific people on this message board. False accusations do happen. I think this thread is destined to go to straight to hell the direction you're taking it.
At least ignore him, you don't have to say anything like that.
22 May 2013, 8:52 pm
Tyri0n wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
marshall wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
I think no man in his right mind would ever get legally married. It is simply too risky; the chances of getting f**** by the system (not by feminists) is too high. But this has nothing to do with feminism.
Who do you think OWNS the divorce/family court systems? ...besides greedy lawyers, that is.
She gets a FREE lawyer for the last three years - I get billed $750 for legal aid just to look at my case and copy a few papers (no, they did nothing for me.)
It's no exaggeration. I had the court Dispute Resolution Officer, her lawyer and other officials laugh to man jokes at my expense right in the courtroom. That's about as brazen as it gets.
I've lost jobs from catty women spreading rumours or getting mad when I wouldn't sleep with them - even imprisoned from a BS accusation as a revenge act for not dating her in high school!
The whole court/legal/corporate system is geared from the bottom up to favour women in almost every circumstance. The only reason there aren't more female board members is because those mega-high positions are ALWAYS reserved for the cultural elite class which the average person can never attain on their own anyway. (Women in the elite class can choose between the huge power of the workplace, or the cushy life of shopping, society parties and bullying servants... often more appealing to them.)
No, the court/legal/corporate system is not geared to favor women. Almost all the highest paying jobs go to men. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly not familiar enough with good jobs to and is probably just bitter about getting beat out for jobs at McDonalds by women. In my field, large law firms--the highest paying jobs--typically are above 80% male. The higher up the ranks you go, the more the disparity increases. Sure, there might be more women managers, at Wal Mart. But it is a fact that the higher in prestige you go, the more male the work force, to the point where Wall Street is 2/3-3/4 male. It would seem that the only guys who are bitter against feminists from an economic standpoint are those who do not have the personal qualities necessary to benefit from male privilege. Which is sad and pathetic at the same time.
Went and read some old posts: I am not going to bring up anything about anyone being the constant recipient of rape accusations. However, if one were a serial harasser and rapist, it makes sense that one might have a bit of trouble in the legal system.
That's why personal anecdotes are out of place in this context. It's impossible to know the full story, and I doubt someone who was an actual rapist and abuser would openly admit to being one. People have a way of remembering things selectively.
Can you tell me why you are flame baiting / trolling?I am tired of being shut down with people's unverifiable personal stories or experiences. It's interesting how religious extremists do the same thing; well, "God healed me from [...] when I [...] so therefore..." An actual rapist/harasser who deserves prison would probably not say anything all that different than what some people here have said. Few are in the wrong in their own minds, and some learn what constitutes "rape" or "harassment" the hard way due to ignorance.
So instead of arguing with personal stories, it's better to argue with facts that are available to all of us, like I am. I have cited multiple indisputable, quantitative facts and can easily back almost all of them up. They have been rebutted with sad personal stories that could very well be the edited versions of experiences by actual rapists/criminals/harassers. There is no way to know for sure. But if a rapist got on this board, he/she would probably say something quite similar.
Facts can be proven wrong. Your facts are disprovable my the simplest of confirmed occurrences of a happy marriage, why fool yourself?
I like you better when you give dating advice, not argue with people who value the traditional way of life. If it makes them happy, you shouldn't be so quick to judge. Are you angry in particular this month trion? You were happier earlier in the year.
Yeah, definitely a rough time. But I am not talking about anyone's traditional values or the traditional way of life here.
Well I hope you get through it.
