Page 7 of 11 [ 167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

Mamselle
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 131

08 Nov 2013, 9:46 am

Schneekugel wrote:
I am as well assuming, that we are not living in Ethiopia. I fully understand, that if the children you have are already suffering from starving, that its senseless to give a child live, that will cost another one already existing childs life. All of that are understandable reasons for me, just like braindead babies, babies with open backspirals, all other kind of babies without any chance of living, babies caused from a rape whatever.

But around here its mostly simply about "not fitting into my life-plan" and such issues. Goddamn life is about a tons of things, not fitting in our life plans. I had as well life plans, not planing a baby until now, but I am simply aware that having a lifeplan does not protect me from stuff happening against my life plan. And that includes far worse things then getting a baby in a non perfect situation. Like cancer, car accident with following lifelong palsy, ...

Yes babies can happen. But unlike tons of other things that can happen, they are not the end of the world, but part of living in that world. If you want to get rid of it by all means, without any more reason then "not fitting in my life plan", I wont bother and accept someones free choice. Friend of mine as well aborted. Asked some technical questions about it, but didnt bother them about my opinion towards it. I was not involved, abortion here is legal, so my personal opinion to it is of not matter for them.

But the moment you ask me to pay it, I would be involved. And forcing me to get involved into abortion, takes me my personal right to choose freely to personally not get involved with it.


Again ... all of us pay taxes and some of the money goes to things we would not personally support. Why is your cause so holy?

Also, as someone else pointed out, abortion is never funded by the government anyway, so your bleating about "my money" is just that ... ignorant bleating.



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

08 Nov 2013, 10:04 am

Mamselle wrote:
Also, as someone else pointed out, abortion is never funded by the government anyway, so your bleating about "my money" is just that ... ignorant bleating.


From a US perspective:
In some individual states, abortion is indirectly funded (via Planned Parenthood).

That being said, I think the issue of government funded abortion is being blown way out of proportion.

The estimated annual cost of all abortions performed in the United States is around $980 million. Federal spending amounts to around $3.796 trillion (2012). That means that even if the federal government paid 100% of the costs for every single abortion performed, it would still be a little under 0.026% (or around 1/40th of 1%) of federal spending.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

08 Nov 2013, 10:14 am

sonofghandi wrote:
Mamselle wrote:
Also, as someone else pointed out, abortion is never funded by the government anyway, so your bleating about "my money" is just that ... ignorant bleating.


From a US perspective:
In some individual states, abortion is indirectly funded (via Planned Parenthood).

That being said, I think the issue of government funded abortion is being blown way out of proportion.

The estimated annual cost of all abortions performed in the United States is around $980 million. Federal spending amounts to around $3.796 trillion (2012). That means that even if the federal government paid 100% of the costs for every single abortion performed, it would still be a little under 0.026% of federal spending.

This isn't about government spending. I tried the same argument with sex reassignment surgery...

Nor is it about the concept of medical necessity. I tried the same argument with sex reassignment surgery...

Those forms of argument are both obvious smoke screens. The real issue is about some people simply *not liking* abortion, and - realising that they have lost the political battle over the legality of abortion itself - try to prevent it by indirect means.



Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

08 Nov 2013, 10:31 am

Mamselle wrote:
Again ... all of us pay taxes and some of the money goes to things we would not personally support. Why is your cause so holy?.


Where would I have written it to be holy? I am atheist.

Founding of certain stuff like a modern art theatre or whatever, I think the money could got spend better, is something that troubles me in the way, that I think we could discuss if that money could spent in other places better. So there is maybe a better use of the money, but the existence of an modern art theatre in the end doesnt affect me that much.

Being a murder, would trouble me. I dont want to be a murder, I dont want to be involved in murder, I dont want to support murder, because in my oppinion all of that makes me a murderer.

The right FOR abortion is for me something I wont bother you at all. If you want to read the forums history, I have always been pro abortion. Forbidding it dont prevent abortion, but only supports illegal abortion. Personally the five months some US counties have, are a bit too long for me personally, but where I live its 10 weeks, so at least its in a time, where there is no ability to feel pain, and if that is the way it is, then that is the way it is for me.

Its ok for me, if you feel fine with that. Its ok for me, if its for you only an termination of potential life for you. Its ok for me that there are different people, having different oppinions and different feelings toward it.

But different opinions involves other opinions as well. Some people dont feel of it as an termination of potential life. For some people that feels like human being, mechanically forced to die by an humans purpose, which is simply murder for them. Murder that simply cannot be prevented, or affected, because of us not being involved, so if we cannot prevent or affect it, accepting it, is all that is possible. So I accept it. I am not responsible about it, so I dont feel personally guilty about it. I can as well accept with other people not feeling guilty about it

But asking why this bothers me, when others want for force me to be involved into it, is like asking why it would bother me, when you come to my house, force me to take a weapon you give, go to my neighbor and shoot him.

I accept abortion, because there is simply no way to go against it, so why waste all that emotions and troubles on something that cannot be affected by all of that. I am ok, if it does not for you and if you are fine with that. But for me, being involved into it feels otherwise, for me its me being a murderer, and I dont know, why you pretend not to understand, that its naturally troubling for most people to think of themselves as murders, if they think of themselves as murderers. If someone shoots someone else accidently or kills him accidently with a car, then I think everyone will understand, why this guy will troubling him with allegations and feel bad about it. Even when he isnt even guilty of it, this will trouble you. So why is it so hard to understand, that I dont want to become responsible of something, that becomes murdering to me? And that this is troubling me much more then "my money going to something I dont support." It doesnt help me, that you would feel otherwise. That wont help me, feeling guilty and sh***y. Around here most of people easily would understand why people dont want to feel horrible sh***y. Supporting by law a modern art theatre may not have my total agreement, but that doesnt make me feel horrible sh***y and question myself, how I could let this happen. Feeling guilty of being a murder does. Again, I can understand people having other opinions about that, and dont blame them not feeling that way. But the same understanding I want as well for me being me and not them, and the feelings that I have.

Maybe you got me wrong all the time, that my feeling would be about blaming you as murderer or whatever. I can live with it being something else for you. I can accept that. But I cannot transform myself into you, just as you cant into me. Have your oppinion about it and its done, thats the way it is around here. There are no big discussions or anything about it. Its simply accepted, that for some people it is fine, because it does not feel like murder. And for some people doing it is not fine, because they would personally feel like themselves being murderers. Both of it is accepted, and everyone will tell you, simply to go what feels best for you. And for me it feels best, not taking that responsibility out of my personal emotions toward it.

Where is the freedom of the choice toward abortion, when you force abortion on everyone? O_o I dont want to abort. How weird have we gotten, when its not the right to abort, but the right to not abort, that we now need to talk about? O_o



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

08 Nov 2013, 10:43 am

Schneekugel wrote:
Where is the freedom of the choice toward abortion, when you force abortion on everyone? O_o I dont want to abort. How weird have we gotten, when its not the right to abort, but the right to not abort, that we now need to talk about? O_o


Who is forcing people to abort? Who is lacking the right to not abort?


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

08 Nov 2013, 12:49 pm

AngelRho wrote:
AspE wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
There's nothing "potential" about it. It's either alive, or it isn't.

It's human flesh. It isn't a human.

So...it's an alien?

:scratch:

My finger is human flesh but it isn't a human. Same with a fetus. Would that your compassion extended to actual babies and mothers, that would be something.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

08 Nov 2013, 1:22 pm

I part company with the pro-choice crowd when it comes to describing a fetus as something less than a human being.

A fetus is a unique individual, and a fetus is undeniably human. I acknowledge without reservation that a fetus is a unique human being--but that does not make a fetus a person. But my support for a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy is in no way impeded by this acknowledgement.


_________________
--James


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

08 Nov 2013, 4:10 pm

91 wrote:
LKL wrote:
sounds like there needs to be some mandatory sex ed at the university in question. Abortion is the worst form of birth control there is, in terms of stress and harm to the woman's body. I personally think it's a necessary option, but it's way worse for a woman than the myriad of other options out there.


I agree completely with the fact that abortion is the worst form of contraception. However, those students have already received sex ed. The state's internal research found that they had a culturally differing views of abortion and unplanned pregnancy. It seemed quite a reasonable idea, that people coming from a country where abortion carries less of a stigma, personal health is viewed differently and unplanned pregnancy has a significant stigma the rates of abortion would be higher. Simply educating people about the risks of abortion to one's health is not enough if they come from a country where everyone smokes inside, the pollution outside will kill you and people resist wearing seat-belts. There is just a different social view on harm.

8O



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

08 Nov 2013, 4:12 pm

I don't think AspE denies that an unborn is genetically of the species Homo sapiens.

I think a case can be made that you aren't "a human" until you have an element of bodily autonomy (a much stronger case than the one that says being human makes you a person- in other mammals the case is even stronger because the young are much more developed than human babies, which are pretty pathetic really), but I got the impression that AspE was just conflating "person" and "human".



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

08 Nov 2013, 4:15 pm

visagrunt wrote:
I part company with the pro-choice crowd when it comes to describing a fetus as something less than a human being.

A fetus is a unique individual, and a fetus is undeniably human. I acknowledge without reservation that a fetus is a unique human being--but that does not make a fetus a person. But my support for a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy is in no way impeded by this acknowledgement.

Just out of curiosity (since I agree with you on most of the rest of this subject), at what point do you start thinking of it as 'a human'? After fertilization, after implantation, after the circulatory system starts to form, after the nervous system starts to form?



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Nov 2013, 6:03 pm

AngelRho wrote:
91 wrote:
LKL wrote:
Why should taxpayers be forced to pay for anyone's healthcare?


I don't have an issue paying for primary healthcare but I do when it comes to electives. By all means if your cancer treatment bill gets too high then I am there for you but its a long bow to draw to make me and my family pay for choice to have an abortion. If you think it is an issue that can be taken care of through collective funding then by all means donate to planned parenthood and create a charity for it.

It's no secret where I stand on the abortion issue. Referring to abortion rights as "reproductive justice" makes me sick. There is no justice in taking a human being's life...I hate the death penalty even, but I hate the necessity for it even more. What "justice"?

Having said that...

I don't think abortion should be COMPLETELY banned. Oklahoma is on the right track. But we have to be careful. If a woman's life is directly threatened by bringing a pregnancy to term, every effort should be taken to save the baby IF AT ALL POSSIBLE; any other procedure that inevitably results in a baby's death should be a last resort ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to save the mother's life IF it is a medical certainty that the mother's life is on the line.

Having said THAT...

I disagree that the couple here made the right choice in getting an abortion. However, this is a truly sad situation in which there is no easy answer. My heart goes out to them. This is a matter of conscience for them, and I can't judge them for that.

@91: I'm not sure this really applies as a typical elective. It's an elective in the sense that they could have had the baby, but not an elective in the sense that they had to make some kind of decision. I'd cringe at the thought of taxpayer money going to killing another human being; but I'm not sure it's best to support a human being that, for all practical purposes, is dead before it's even born. This one has got me stumped. What complicates the matter is that the couple didn't really WANT to go that direction; they genuinely felt that this was a loss and felt that termination was necessary on several different levels. I just can't judge them that harshly. What seems to get the most attention in the abortion debate is the contempt baby-killers have for the unborn. I don't see that contempt here, though it certainly isn't lacking with some of the others quoted in the article, at least in tone (it wouldn't be a very good PMSnbc article without it). While I disagree with their decision, I have to be somewhat sympathetic in THIS case.


Da Big Man in da Sky wrote:
Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.



Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

08 Nov 2013, 6:23 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
Schneekugel wrote:
Where is the freedom of the choice toward abortion, when you force abortion on everyone? O_o I dont want to abort. How weird have we gotten, when its not the right to abort, but the right to not abort, that we now need to talk about? O_o


Who is forcing people to abort? Who is lacking the right to not abort?


I I pay a mechanic to repair my car, its me causing my car to get repaired. If I pay a man to kill a human, its me causing this human too get killed. I dont want to kill a human.

How weird are you, making me allegations, about not wanting me to be responsible about killing someone? O_o



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

08 Nov 2013, 6:42 pm

You aren't paying for abortions though. You're paying taxes.

If you put money in a homeless person's hat and he uses it to buy a smoothie, have you bought a smoothie?
If you buy a Volkswagen and the owner of VW buys McDonalds, have you bought McDonalds?

I'm sorry, this is too fun to not reduce to absurdity...

If McDonalds pays a lumberjack to clear rainforest for their cows and the lumberjack uses the money to buy a vaccination for his children, did you buy a car, a fast food company and a vaccination?
If a scientist at a drugs company pays to have an abortion with the wages they earn from manufacturing the vaccine, is buying a Volkswagen equivalent to buying an abortion?



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

08 Nov 2013, 6:46 pm

the ultimate hypocrisy here is that 'pro-life' people have no issue with paying taxes to a government that then spends it on drone missiles that wipes out a family in Pakistan, but whenever proposals are made to give economically less well off women access to abortions they lose their s**t.

"If you think foetuses are more important than women, try getting a foetus to wash the s**t stains out of your underwear"
-George Carlin


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

08 Nov 2013, 11:08 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
You aren't paying for abortions though. You're paying taxes.

If you put money in a homeless person's hat and he uses it to buy a smoothie, have you bought a smoothie?
If you buy a Volkswagen and the owner of VW buys McDonalds, have you bought McDonalds?

I'm sorry, this is too fun to not reduce to absurdity...

If McDonalds pays a lumberjack to clear rainforest for their cows and the lumberjack uses the money to buy a vaccination for his children, did you buy a car, a fast food company and a vaccination?
If a scientist at a drugs company pays to have an abortion with the wages they earn from manufacturing the vaccine, is buying a Volkswagen equivalent to buying an abortion?

It doesn't reduce to absurdity so easily as you'd have us believe. In a totalitarian or authoritarian society, you'd be exactly right.

The problem, and why this isn't absurd, is that in a FREE society, such as democratic or republic forms of government, it's the will of the people that predominantly determines what it is tax money supports. Someone who opposes abortion on various grounds--religious grounds as an example--cannot escape the fact that through paying taxes he or she is tacitly supporting infanticide. This isn't something a person like that can do in good conscience.

And I'm using religious objections as just one example. You don't have to be religious to understand that abortion is murdering babies (more often than not, of course). If you're opposed to murder, then it makes sense you'd oppose abortion on principle. Nor would you be inclined to allow for the murder of the unborn. If that's the position you find yourself in, you can go for activism and public protest, and/or civil disobedience by refusing to pay taxes. Your best bet, of course, is make every effort to vote for representatives who would see to it that abortion is eliminated rather than to support it by tucking your tail between your legs, sticking your head in the sand, be a good little boy/girl and pay your taxes because you fear punishment from a government that encourages infanticide.

In a free society, you don't merely have the "right" to speak and vote your conscience...you have the DUTY and RESPONSIBILITY to.



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

09 Nov 2013, 12:29 am

AngelRho wrote:
It doesn't reduce to absurdity so easily as you'd have us believe. In a totalitarian or authoritarian society, you'd be exactly right.


I agree completely. Render unto Caesar what is due to Caesar, but we are not living under Caesars anymore.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.