Page 7 of 13 [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13  Next

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Jan 2014, 2:35 pm

^It isn't just Ron Jeremy's size, but his stamina. He did one film where he serviced about a dozen different women during an afternoon.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,336

09 Jan 2014, 6:24 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
^It isn't just Ron Jeremy's size, but his stamina. He did one film where he serviced about a dozen different women during an afternoon.


Well yeah..he was getting paid for it and all and so were the girls...

But in real life..nah..seriously it's the guys looking at his tool...

Not the girls..no matter how many girls he services..or 'how long' he goes at it....

It's both funny and ironic..if a person thinks about that for a few minutes...

IN real life..the ladies wouldn't give him a second glance...

Seriously..that's no joke at all.

He don't get many points for what really counts for the ladies...

But YES..for the friggin men that are all up @night thinking about their weiners..and all of that....

He does get points with them..oh god..that's ironic...

And seriously part of the reason..teenage pregnancies are down...

Guys..overall.. just aren't as interested in Vaginas like theY use to be...

Porn is directing them to Penises..instead..

IN fact in JAPAN..THERE IS A POPULATION IMPLOSION..

While the dudes are getting off on virtual penis sex...and IN SOUTH KOREA.. SPECIFICALLY a
cosmetics..explosion.. for men doing up their faces...

Now to be clear all this is kool with me..

Whatever floats one's boat is up to one..

as far as i am concerned...

But i like vaginas..

And don't care much for porn..except for Lesbian scenes and female masturbation..and all of that....


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,378
Location: Soul Society

09 Jan 2014, 6:32 pm

I think if Jesus was still alive at the time Pal said it was better to not get married at all, he would have punched him in the face. Jesus wouldn't like at all people were being taught that getting married was worse or even better than not getting married.


_________________
comedic burp


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

09 Jan 2014, 6:37 pm

You can take the two opposing viewpoints on marriage and reach the conclusion of compromise. People who want to be married be allowed to but no one should ever feel pressured or they are obligated.



appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,378
Location: Soul Society

09 Jan 2014, 7:30 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
You can take the two opposing viewpoints on marriage and reach the conclusion of compromise. People who want to be married be allowed to but no one should ever feel pressured or they are obligated.


Exactly.


_________________
comedic burp


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

09 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
You can take the two opposing viewpoints on marriage and reach the conclusion of compromise. People who want to be married be allowed to but no one should ever feel pressured or they are obligated.


I believe this is already the view of the same-sex marriage proponents, except we may specify no only than 2 people may enter into marriage.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


JHwolf
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jan 2014
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 10

11 Jan 2014, 1:08 am

I think it's kinda for safety reasons, those women screw every man(and woman) state to nation wide. They picked up every STI in existance.
Would you want to stick Your member anywhere near that? Do you even want that on the street?



mikecartwright
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 398

11 Jan 2014, 10:50 am

Prostitution illegal because of Religion people view it as a sin or amoral.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

17 Jan 2014, 11:21 am

The following quotes are from a book I'm reading: Patty's Guide to Thai Ladies & All Men, by Patcha Boonjaeng and Tony Crossley

Quote:
Arriving in Thailand was for me a revelation with regard to the sex trade. Never before having used it or even considered it, I admit I arrived when my self-esteem was at a low ebb. It didn't take me long to realize how ret*d western culture is in this regard. I actually came to believe that the trade is feared by some people for exactly the same reason as some primitives remove the female's clitoris: fear of a woman's superior ability in the field of play.


Sarah Wilde wrote:
The upside of a sex trade is that at an early age, men can get a grounding in sexuality. At the time of life they are most likely to interact with the opposite gender, many more Western men than at present would learn the difference between a sexual encounter as a paid-for service, as opposed to an act of true attraction. Thai men appear to learn this. Once Western expats in Thailand have purged the urges built up from prior deprivation, they tend to settle for one partner....

...This all exposes a deficiency in Western social culture, as if a man is single for any reason after a certain age, his opportunity for a decent sex life is practically zero. A simple fact is that Western social policy has never considered the sexual needs of men, whether the needs be physical or mental...


Quote:
Denigration of a woman for choosing fiscal consideration for use of her vagina over emotional surrender of it is a far more outrageous abuse than racism or homophobia and other types of sexism, yet is patently caused and allowed by tyrannical legislation.


Sarah Wilde wrote:
....Is a woman who gives a man her favor after being entertained on a night out a prostitute? It can be far more expensive for a man to so entertain a woman than paying her cash. The former just allows him to believe he has not paid for sex. Is a woman who marries for security less a prostitute than one who works as a sex aide to be independent?...

....A simple truth is that women providing sex services in exchange for security or other gain has always been the way of life, perpetuated exponentially by man's determined attempts to make woman dependent by first obstructing her education, and then with a long list of impediments to her independence. Every wile that women use, each trick they employ to snare a man, comes from man's long-time determination to make woman dependent.

Calling the provision of sex services "prostitution" is policing thought to put a stigmatizing restriction on women and men too. I contend that making it illegal to operate premises where consenting adults engage in an exchange that profits one, pleasures and/or relieves the other and harms no one, is a human rights abuse.

I further contend that in UK courts, a charge against a person of "living off immoral earnings" could be defended on the grounds that prosecuting such a charge when only consenting adults are said to be engaging in sex, is itself immoral and an abuse of power--authority gone mad...



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

17 Jan 2014, 11:49 am

As the joke goes, you don't pay a woman for sex.

You pay her to go away afterwards and not expect you to call her.

Really, unless a woman goes out to find a partner and initiate sex without expecting him to do anything to first "win" the prize, in one way or another, a man winds up "paying" for sex either in gifts, entertainment, etc. because he is expected to win her over from a "no" or "maybe" to a "yes."



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

17 Jan 2014, 12:47 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
As the joke goes, you don't pay a woman for sex.

You pay her to go away afterwards and not expect you to call her.

Really, unless a woman goes out to find a partner and initiate sex without expecting him to do anything to first "win" the prize, in one way or another, a man winds up "paying" for sex either in gifts, entertainment, etc. because he is expected to win her over from a "no" or "maybe" to a "yes."


The joke certainly has an element of truth. Men also patronize prostitutes of either sex or gender more than women do.

I disagree about the way you seem to solidify every woman's intentions, though. I think that women go out just like normal people do, with an open mind about what the night might bring. Other times, of course, either a woman or a normal person could go out with specific intent and execute the same deliberately.



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

17 Jan 2014, 12:51 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
As the joke goes, you don't pay a woman for sex.

You pay her to go away afterwards and not expect you to call her.

Really, unless a woman goes out to find a partner and initiate sex without expecting him to do anything to first "win" the prize, in one way or another, a man winds up "paying" for sex either in gifts, entertainment, etc. because he is expected to win her over from a "no" or "maybe" to a "yes."


I've always found the whole 'all men pay for it' to be another way of saying 'all women are prostitutes.' I find it misogynistic. I like sex and I have with my partner without expecting anything from it other than sex. I don't consider him spending time with me as payment because he actually likes my company. Yeah, some men actually like talking to some women. Mindblowing, innit?


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

17 Jan 2014, 12:53 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
Other times, of course, either a woman or a normal person could go out with specific intent and execute the same deliberately.


:lol: at your wording.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

17 Jan 2014, 12:57 pm

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr ... 58100.html


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

17 Jan 2014, 2:47 pm

Another quote from the book mentioned above:

Giovanni Boccaccio wrote:
While farmers generally allow one rooster for ten hens, ten men are scarcely sufficient for one woman.


Which is an excellent point. A woman could easily cause ten men to ejaculate during the course of a workday. For a man to cause ten women to experience orgasm during the day, that would be quite a feat. Ron Jeremy might be up for it, but he is exceptional.

Making prostitution illegal does indeed seem to be a key Patriarchal priority for keeping women dependent, subjugated, and under the control of men. Patriarchal men do not want to be put to shame by being reminded of how poorly their sexual prowess compares to the female. And, they feel threatened by the amount of money that a woman could make on her own in the profession. The women would become wealthier than men, and be able to support themselves independently, which would be wholly unacceptable for the Patriarchs.

Patcha Boonjaeng and Tony Crossley wrote:
....The West's cultural self-contradiction is that it espouses freedom and democracy, but has moral values rooted in spiritual terrorism and dictatorship. For centuries, authorities have insisted that for the most natural act of life to be "decent", it should only happen within marriage (initiated by the Bible)...


1 Corinthians 7 wrote:
Because there is so much immorality, every man should have his own wife, and every woman should have her own husband.


1 Corinthians 11 wrote:
I want you to understand that Christ is supreme over every man, the husband is supreme over his wife, and God is supreme over Christ. So a man who prays or proclaims God's message in public worship with his head covered disgraces Christ. And any woman who prays or proclaims God's message in public worship with nothing on her head disgraces her husband; there is no difference between her and a woman whose head has been shaved. If the woman does not cover her head, she might as well cut her hair. And since it is a shameful thing for a woman to shave her head or cut her hair, she should cover her head. A man has no need to cover his head, because he reflects the image and glory of God. But woman reflects the glory of man; for man was not created from woman, but woman from man. Nor was man created for woman's sake, but woman was created for man's sake. On account of the angels, then, a woman should have a covering over her head to show that she is under her husband's authority.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

17 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm

I will refer you also to Mark Twain's Letters from the Earth

http://www.classicreader.com/book/1930/9/

wherein he proves, beyond all doubt,

Mark Twain wrote:
You have heretofore found out, by my teachings, that man is a fool; you are now aware that woman is a damned fool.


I really don't perceive any counter-arguments at all.