Why is prostitution illegal?
Well yeah..he was getting paid for it and all and so were the girls...
But in real life..nah..seriously it's the guys looking at his tool...
Not the girls..no matter how many girls he services..or 'how long' he goes at it....
It's both funny and ironic..if a person thinks about that for a few minutes...
IN real life..the ladies wouldn't give him a second glance...
Seriously..that's no joke at all.
He don't get many points for what really counts for the ladies...
But YES..for the friggin men that are all up @night thinking about their weiners..and all of that....
He does get points with them..oh god..that's ironic...
And seriously part of the reason..teenage pregnancies are down...
Guys..overall.. just aren't as interested in Vaginas like theY use to be...
Porn is directing them to Penises..instead..
IN fact in JAPAN..THERE IS A POPULATION IMPLOSION..
While the dudes are getting off on virtual penis sex...and IN SOUTH KOREA.. SPECIFICALLY a
cosmetics..explosion.. for men doing up their faces...
Now to be clear all this is kool with me..
Whatever floats one's boat is up to one..
as far as i am concerned...
But i like vaginas..
And don't care much for porn..except for Lesbian scenes and female masturbation..and all of that....
_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI
Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !
http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick
I think if Jesus was still alive at the time Pal said it was better to not get married at all, he would have punched him in the face. Jesus wouldn't like at all people were being taught that getting married was worse or even better than not getting married.
_________________
comedic burp
I believe this is already the view of the same-sex marriage proponents, except we may specify no only than 2 people may enter into marriage.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
The following quotes are from a book I'm reading: Patty's Guide to Thai Ladies & All Men, by Patcha Boonjaeng and Tony Crossley
...This all exposes a deficiency in Western social culture, as if a man is single for any reason after a certain age, his opportunity for a decent sex life is practically zero. A simple fact is that Western social policy has never considered the sexual needs of men, whether the needs be physical or mental...
....A simple truth is that women providing sex services in exchange for security or other gain has always been the way of life, perpetuated exponentially by man's determined attempts to make woman dependent by first obstructing her education, and then with a long list of impediments to her independence. Every wile that women use, each trick they employ to snare a man, comes from man's long-time determination to make woman dependent.
Calling the provision of sex services "prostitution" is policing thought to put a stigmatizing restriction on women and men too. I contend that making it illegal to operate premises where consenting adults engage in an exchange that profits one, pleasures and/or relieves the other and harms no one, is a human rights abuse.
I further contend that in UK courts, a charge against a person of "living off immoral earnings" could be defended on the grounds that prosecuting such a charge when only consenting adults are said to be engaging in sex, is itself immoral and an abuse of power--authority gone mad...
As the joke goes, you don't pay a woman for sex.
You pay her to go away afterwards and not expect you to call her.
Really, unless a woman goes out to find a partner and initiate sex without expecting him to do anything to first "win" the prize, in one way or another, a man winds up "paying" for sex either in gifts, entertainment, etc. because he is expected to win her over from a "no" or "maybe" to a "yes."
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
You pay her to go away afterwards and not expect you to call her.
Really, unless a woman goes out to find a partner and initiate sex without expecting him to do anything to first "win" the prize, in one way or another, a man winds up "paying" for sex either in gifts, entertainment, etc. because he is expected to win her over from a "no" or "maybe" to a "yes."
The joke certainly has an element of truth. Men also patronize prostitutes of either sex or gender more than women do.
I disagree about the way you seem to solidify every woman's intentions, though. I think that women go out just like normal people do, with an open mind about what the night might bring. Other times, of course, either a woman or a normal person could go out with specific intent and execute the same deliberately.
You pay her to go away afterwards and not expect you to call her.
Really, unless a woman goes out to find a partner and initiate sex without expecting him to do anything to first "win" the prize, in one way or another, a man winds up "paying" for sex either in gifts, entertainment, etc. because he is expected to win her over from a "no" or "maybe" to a "yes."
I've always found the whole 'all men pay for it' to be another way of saying 'all women are prostitutes.' I find it misogynistic. I like sex and I have with my partner without expecting anything from it other than sex. I don't consider him spending time with me as payment because he actually likes my company. Yeah, some men actually like talking to some women. Mindblowing, innit?
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr ... 58100.html
_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi
Another quote from the book mentioned above:
Which is an excellent point. A woman could easily cause ten men to ejaculate during the course of a workday. For a man to cause ten women to experience orgasm during the day, that would be quite a feat. Ron Jeremy might be up for it, but he is exceptional.
Making prostitution illegal does indeed seem to be a key Patriarchal priority for keeping women dependent, subjugated, and under the control of men. Patriarchal men do not want to be put to shame by being reminded of how poorly their sexual prowess compares to the female. And, they feel threatened by the amount of money that a woman could make on her own in the profession. The women would become wealthier than men, and be able to support themselves independently, which would be wholly unacceptable for the Patriarchs.
I will refer you also to Mark Twain's Letters from the Earth
http://www.classicreader.com/book/1930/9/
wherein he proves, beyond all doubt,
I really don't perceive any counter-arguments at all.
