Page 7 of 9 [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

AlexandertheSolitary
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 945
Location: Melbourne

07 Mar 2007, 11:49 pm

Hazelwudi wrote:
Ann Coulter is a laughingstock at best. She is a bitter, confused, middle-aged shrew who holds forth endlessly on family values, and yet has never even had a steady boyfriend at any point in the course of her life, let alone a husband, let alone children.

One wonders why Republicans haven't started asking themselves precisely why this is.


What has her age got to do with it? Or her being unmarried with no steady boyfriend for that matter? Her views are poisonous. The other details Hazelwudi lists except perhaps the bitterness (but do not forget many on Wrong Planet are bitter, so be careful!) are irrelevant, just as her own gratuitous remarks are. Also how bitter she may be is known only, if at all to her and God.

I have known people both considerably older, considerably younger and about the same age with more sense.

Equally spinsters, (horrible word I know) bachelors, wives, husbands etc. have no monopoly on either vice or virtue. I agree with you in opposing her, but I do not see how the intrusion of irrelevant information helps the argument at all.


_________________
You are like children playing in the market-place saying, "We piped for you and you would not dance, we wailed a dirge for you and you would not weep."


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

08 Mar 2007, 1:32 am

alex, i think his point is that ann coulter is projecting her own latent homosexuality onto others when she called john edwards a fa***t.


i disagree. i think she's just too venomous for any man to deal with in a long term relationship. she probably likes it that way, it seems the person she loves the most is herself. she's a narcissist. pretty easy.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

08 Mar 2007, 2:16 am

skafather84 wrote:
alex, i think his point is that ann coulter is projecting her own latent homosexuality onto others when she called john edwards a fa***t.


i disagree. i think she's just too venomous for any man to deal with in a long term relationship. she probably likes it that way, it seems the person she loves the most is herself. she's a narcissist. pretty easy.


True, the woman's ego is the size of a big balloon.


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


Hazelwudi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 511

08 Mar 2007, 6:27 am

AlexandertheSolitary wrote:
Hazelwudi wrote:
Ann Coulter is a laughingstock at best. She is a bitter, confused, middle-aged shrew who holds forth endlessly on family values, and yet has never even had a steady boyfriend at any point in the course of her life, let alone a husband, let alone children.

One wonders why Republicans haven't started asking themselves precisely why this is.


What has her age got to do with it? Or her being unmarried with no steady boyfriend for that matter? Her views are poisonous. The other details Hazelwudi lists except perhaps the bitterness (but do not forget many on Wrong Planet are bitter, so be careful!) are irrelevant, just as her own gratuitous remarks are. Also how bitter she may be is known only, if at all to her and God.

I have known people both considerably older, considerably younger and about the same age with more sense.

Equally spinsters, (horrible word I know) bachelors, wives, husbands etc. have no monopoly on either vice or virtue. I agree with you in opposing her, but I do not see how the intrusion of irrelevant information helps the argument at all.


I explained some posts later precisely why it is indeed very relevant. When I first heard of her, she was (among other ridiculous things) constantly ragging on Bill Clinton for supposedly being gay. Now, given how much ass he notoriously got, this was absolutely mind boggling. I thought, "Ok... who is this deluded woman, exactly?" so I made it a point to learn of her own background.

A middle-aged woman who has never even managed to have a steady boyfriend at any point in her life (let alone marriage or children), accusing confirmed heterosexuals of homosexuality? Huh?

A middle-aged woman who constantly goes on about the American family and "family values".... who has steadfastly avoided participating in these things herself all her life? No, something's just not right there.

Yes, I'm fully aware that a lot of people on WP are bitter. Frankly I get sick of hearing them whine and blame everyone and everything but themselves for their troubles too. I have never pretended otherwise.



Last edited by Hazelwudi on 08 Mar 2007, 6:43 am, edited 2 times in total.

Hazelwudi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 511

08 Mar 2007, 6:30 am

skafather84 wrote:
alex, i think his point is that ann coulter is projecting her own latent homosexuality onto others when she called john edwards a fa***t.


She.

This is hardly the first time she's accused obviously heterosexual men of being gay, either.

In her case, one might be tempted to chalk up her own relationship peculiarities to her personality... i.e. no man wants to get involved with such a b***h. But you know, golddigging is not only something done by the female of the species... there are men out there (god help them) who would marry a woman like that, simply because she is (in)famous and wealthy.



jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

08 Mar 2007, 12:50 pm

Hazelwudi wrote:
A middle-aged woman who has never even managed to have a steady boyfriend at any point in her life (let alone marriage or children), accusing confirmed heterosexuals of homosexuality? Huh?

A middle-aged woman who constantly goes on about the American family and "family values".... who has steadfastly avoided participating in these things herself all her life? No, something's just not right there.


Based on what precisely? Can you source something? When has it been an idea in America that everyone must have a perfect ideal life?

So Ann Coulter, who I don't care much for in the political arena, must be a lesbian or something because she has never gotten married. She has had boyfriends. Perhaps she is scared of commitments. Perhaps there are individual elements to her life story that we just don't know about.

See this is an astonishing simplification of the psyche. "She didn't like gays, so she must be gay." Gays were once treated to the most abject cruelty as a matter of common practice in the middle ages. The vast majority of people, up until recently, thought being gay was "wicked." Were these people perhaps all latent homosexuals?

This isn't to say if Coulter was gay I would care, because I honestly wouldn't. This is (partially) because I personally prefer not to argue or discuss other people's personally lives unless it becomes absolutely necessary.

You may not like Coulter, but please consider your arguments rationally, and objectively.

Hazelwudi wrote:
In her case, one might be tempted to chalk up her own relationship peculiarities to her personality... i.e. no man wants to get involved with such a b***h. But you know, golddigging is not only something done by the female of the species... there are men out there (god help them) who would marry a woman like that, simply because she is (in)famous and wealthy.


Of course. Then again perhaps someone did want to get involve with "such a b***h" (why this language always? Are you trying to reduce yourself to her level?). From what I understand to the best of my knowledge her boyfriends were people were personal acquiescences, not desperate types.



Hazelwudi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 511

11 Mar 2007, 8:14 am

Hazelwudi wrote:
A middle-aged woman who has never even managed to have a steady boyfriend at any point in her life (let alone marriage or children), accusing confirmed heterosexuals of homosexuality? Huh?

A middle-aged woman who constantly goes on about the American family and "family values".... who has steadfastly avoided participating in these things herself all her life? No, something's just not right there.


jimservo wrote:
Based on what precisely? Can you source something? When has it been an idea in America that everyone must have a perfect ideal life?


Can I source something for what? Her age? Check Wikipedia, that's where I got it. The substance of her rants? Google it, I'm not doing your work for you. Given these, my argument is hardly difficult to follow... well, assuming you've got any understanding of psychology and any common sense whatsoever.

Quote:
So Ann Coulter, who I don't care much for in the political arena, must be a lesbian or something because she has never gotten married. She has had boyfriends. Perhaps she is scared of commitments. Perhaps there are individual elements to her life story that we just don't know about.


Condi Rice is not married either, but she doesn't seem to suffer from some sort of compulsion where she must run around repeatedly accusing confirmed heterosexuals of being "fa***ts".

Quote:
See this is an astonishing simplification of the psyche. "She didn't like gays, so she must be gay." Gays were once treated to the most abject cruelty as a matter of common practice in the middle ages. The vast majority of people, up until recently, thought being gay was "wicked." Were these people perhaps all latent homosexuals?


I am routinely amazed how very simple everything becomes when people stop trying to make everything insanely complicated via overlooking the totally obvious. 8)

Quote:
This isn't to say if Coulter was gay I would care, because I honestly wouldn't. This is (partially) because I personally prefer not to argue or discuss other people's personally lives unless it becomes absolutely necessary.


Coulter's in a lose/lose situation... if I were prone to fits of pity, I'd feel sorry for her. If you're not entirely straight and a mouthpiece for the far left, you won't lose any points with your base if/when the truth comes out. This is hardly true when you have the far right as a base.

Quote:
You may not like Coulter, but please consider your arguments rationally, and objectively.


That's precisely what I'm doing, so why don't you take your own advice?

Quote:
Of course. Then again perhaps someone did want to get involve with "such a b***h" (why this language always? Are you trying to reduce yourself to her level?). From what I understand to the best of my knowledge her boyfriends were people were personal acquiescences, not desperate types.


Again, if she thinks so highly of the institution of marriage and of "family values"... why is she not participating?



Santa_Claus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,846
Location: City 17

11 Mar 2007, 2:41 pm

I hate her, she is a loser who gains from the pain of others, she is an utterly useless piece of crap.



janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

11 Mar 2007, 11:14 pm

She isn't just uttering more and more mean things as of late. Did you miss the whole 9/11 widows bit?



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

11 Mar 2007, 11:50 pm

janicka wrote:
She isn't just uttering more and more mean things as of late. Did you miss the whole 9/11 widows bit?


Your effing kidding me right?!

She insulted the families of those who died in the 9/11 attacks?!

That's as low as you can go!


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


Johnnie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: green mountian state

12 Mar 2007, 8:37 am

Flagg wrote:
janicka wrote:
She isn't just uttering more and more mean things as of late. Did you miss the whole 9/11 widows bit?


Your effing kidding me right?!

She insulted the families of those who died in the 9/11 attacks?!

That's as low as you can go!


In her book, Coulter said, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/200 ... lter_x.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/200 ... lter_x.htm

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wir ... SFeeds0312

Sounds like Ann can spot glory hounds when she see's them. There is a differance between people that happen to get in the news and people who will milk their 15 minutes of fame for all they can and go out of the way to get in the headlines again.

You people don't come across as having AS because you are over emotional and irrational, more like hysterical ranting NT's.



janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

12 Mar 2007, 4:53 pm

That was the point of my original statement, Flagg. Jimservo made it sound like he's only taken issue with what she has said recently. The attack on the 9/11 widows was like a year or two ago - not really recent.



Johnnie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: green mountian state

12 Mar 2007, 6:12 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
You people don't come across as having AS because you are over emotional and irrational, more like hysterical ranting NT's.



not hardly. it's entirely logical to hate ann coulter because she's a moron propagandist whose hate speech encourages a further de-evolution of society..


Making fun of fools isn't hate speech. Hate speech is radical groups like skin heads and the democrap party who hates america.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

12 Mar 2007, 6:46 pm

Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
You people don't come across as having AS because you are over emotional and irrational, more like hysterical ranting NT's.



not hardly. it's entirely logical to hate ann coulter because she's a moron propagandist whose hate speech encourages a further de-evolution of society..


Making fun of fools isn't hate speech. Hate speech is radical groups like skin heads and the democrap party who hates america.



okay fa***t.



Johnnie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: green mountian state

12 Mar 2007, 7:32 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
You people don't come across as having AS because you are over emotional and irrational, more like hysterical ranting NT's.



not hardly. it's entirely logical to hate ann coulter because she's a moron propagandist whose hate speech encourages a further de-evolution of society..


Making fun of fools isn't hate speech. Hate speech is radical groups like skin heads and the democrap party who hates america.



okay fa***t.


wow I'm really hurt, somebody called me a name

Newt in 08



snake321
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,135

12 Mar 2007, 7:51 pm

ahayes wrote:
Liberals define anything that is not liberal as "Extreme Right Wing", hence, the only non-lilberal news channel is dubbed as such.


Conservatives do the same thing.