What "science" disproves higher beings?

Post Reply New Topic

True, and if God believes in himself to exist (which he does), he's not an atheist as God is God himself, and the poster who said that it would translate to atheist is a moron.

God wrote something? Literally?[/quote] Obviously through revelations from his "apostles", but it's his words and they were commanded to write every single word that he said, not just inspired.[/quote]

O.k. soo there was no actual writing in regards to this being. You ever hear the story about the kid who said he has blue shoes with a red stripe, and pass it on. It goes down the line, and after a few kids it ends up being a purple glove with a yellow string. Same concept. Somewhere down the line, I actally thought god wrote something, until you corrected it. But now you have to go back to where you heard it from, and he is dead. Actually a whole group of them, that had all kinds of things to say. Dead. A multitude of misinterpretation. That is my interpretation.

Obviously through revelations from his "apostles", but it's his words and they were commanded to write every single word that he said, not just inspired.[/quote]

O.k. soo there was no actual writing in regards to this being. You ever hear the story about the kid who said he has blue shoes with a red stripe, and pass it on. It goes down the line, and after a few kids it ends up being a purple glove with a yellow string. Same concept. Somewhere down the line, I actally thought god wrote something, until you corrected it. But now you have to go back to where you heard it from, and he is dead. Actually a whole group of them, that had all kinds of things to say. Dead. A multitude of misinterpretation. That is my interpretation.[/quote] Do I really need to spell things out? God told the stories and WRITTEN BY his supposedly "apostles", there is a difference here. It's still "God's words", they are just not dramatized and fictional stuff added by the apostles as they were biblical inspires, got it?

Odin is not a minor deity! He's the main dude of the pantheon, more or less.

But god would have to have a god to create him he couldn't just always be there since every origin has to have a pre origin so a god would have to create another god but since there is no other god given if gods exist that god doesn't believe in another god hence it would be an athiest!

~Takes a bow~

(Hopefully I fixed all the quoting...)

So when people made later changes, they were instructed to by God as well?

I cannot believe that you're this much of an ignoramus. You don't understand the concept of God, when you do; you can talk.

No.

It's not even the same language?

If you have 12 Apostles, you'll have 12 different takes upon what "God" dictated to them.

logically, the burden of proof lies with the one making the positive assumption. no one needs to prove god doesn't exist. the burden of proof is on those who claim god exists. it is impossible to prove a negative. i believe in fairies. prove that i'm wrong.

I DO NOT BELIEVE IN FAIRIES!! ! *fairy starts choking and dies* Muahahahha!

Who would know. Some say Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew, Latin. There are quite a few.

I wouldn't want to! The planet was sneezed from the nose of the Great Green Arklesiezure. Everyone knows that!

If you are talking about theories of the origin and nature of the universe other than the Great Green Arklesiezure, then I doubt you would understand the workings of super-symmetry or d-branes, but feel free to give it a try. See if any of this material is relevant.

http://newton.kias.re.kr/~brane/2004/Y.%20Kim/fms.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep--th/9812219.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1108.4424.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.1284.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.1521.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.3082.pdf

I never could quite master it, so I just stick to the blessed Great Green Arklesiezure and my Lord and Master Ningishzida. Hail to the Underworld!

Not all forms of Buddhism require a deity, nor do all forms of paganism.

I think that you have been misdirecting your prayers, though. The only deity who really answers your pleas is my Lord and Master Ningishzida, although the most reliable way to contact him would be to sacrifice several human vict...uh...volunteers, which would not be very nice. Us followers of Ningishzida are still trying to figure out what the Lord of the Underworld would want to do with them, but that remains a mystery.

You still have to define a "higher being" besides affirming the existence of the Great Green Arklesiezure. Saying "disprove something! Anything!" and then saying, "No, that's not it!" is a Where's Waldo game that no self-respecting person is going to play with you.

Playing these kinds of annoying games is rude, and it's time someone called you out on it. Clearly define what it is that you want to discuss, or you could just man up to the fact that the universe was truly sneezed from the nose of the Great Green Arklesiezure.

Actually, science is really a more rigorous extension of philosophy that is based on a massive application of empiricism. Empiricism means working with empirical data. No empirical data, no claim to either the affirmative or the contrary.

I pity your congregation. You are more interested in trying to prove the skeptics wrong than trying to nurture people's spirits and support their faith. That's very poor form for a religious leader.

Things in th universe are not unlike riding a wave.