Scalia Death Conflicting Reports Coming In
Nice feedback from the Left, as usual. Next?
Nurseangela! Have they lured you into PPR too?! I didn't expect to find you wading through this place.
Nice feedback from the Left, as usual. Next?
Nurseangela! Have they lured you into PPR too?! I didn't expect to find you wading through this place.
She's actually a regular in these parts.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I don't sleep with a pillow over my head. You? Nothing else is being explained so why should the pillow be explained? Maybe someone almost got caught.
There is NO EXCUSE for having no autopsy or toxicology.
No one on the Left is explaining anything that makes sense. You want to look the other way on this too, go ahead. That's what the Left ALWAYS does. Very convenient.
I think more than enough people here have explained why Scalia might have slept with a pillow over his head.
But you get your news from Michael Savage????? You do know that he's an autism denier, don't you?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In the hospital, regular people get an autopsy if the death is at all questionable and the doctor can overrule the family on that decision.
Again, he was 79. He died. We all have that in store...
In the hospital, regular people get an autopsy if the death is at all questionable and the doctor can overrule the family on that decision.
Again, he was 79. He died. We all have that in store...
Look up Occam's razor...
I don't sleep with a pillow over my head. You? Nothing else is being explained so why should the pillow be explained? Maybe someone almost got caught.
There is NO EXCUSE for having no autopsy or toxicology.
No one on the Left is explaining anything that makes sense. You want to look the other way on this too, go ahead. That's what the Left ALWAYS does. Very convenient.
I think more than enough people here have explained why Scalia might have slept with a pillow over his head.
But you get your news from Michael Savage????? You do know that he's an autism denier, don't you?
I knew someone would bring this up. This is what I mean by thinking for yourself and asking questions and finding facts. I have several different news sources that I listen to and Michael Savage is one. So is Glenn Beck, Drudge, Alex Jones, Sean Hannity, and to a point Fox News and CNN. I will not listen to MSNBC. Even though I may listen to these sources I also pick and choose what I believe. I will listen then compare notes to the others. I will not believe anything if there is conflicting information. I find the big channels like CNN and Fox aren't going to tell the small bits of info that could be important. People always say they don't think these sources are credible, but Glenn Beck, Savage and Alex Jones will tell you what they know and then not to accept what they say as fact, but to research and make sure what they are saying is true.
About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.
If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.
If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.
Fox Mulder, Dana Scully is a little easier to reach though.
_________________
I'm a math evangelist, I believe in theorems and ignore the proofs.
^This.
Anyone who is smart should know they need to cover themselves and do an autopsy. If this had been a Democrat official, I would have still expected an autopsy be performed. This guy is just too important for his death to be swept under the carpet.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.
If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.
Fox Mulder, Dana Scully is a little easier to reach though.
Hardy Har Har. Next.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02 ... rning_Test
This just in. The Justice of the Peace is trying to paint Scalia with all these "supposed" health problems relating to his heart. Scalia evidently had an MRI done of his shoulder and she is saying that Scalia wasn't a surgical candidate because of cardiac problems. Patients do have to go through a cardiac workup and be cleared by a cardiologist for surgery. Scalia evidently needed a rotator cuff surgery and was told that physical therapy would be best. Scalia needed rotator cuff surgery because he's an AVID TENNIS PLAYER according to the article. I went on the Internet to find other evidence that Scalia did play tennis and I did find several sources that confirmed it to be true. If the guy can play tennis, he sure doesn't have any heart problems. Another piece of the puzzle.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
This just in. The Justice of the Peace is trying to paint Scalia with all these "supposed" health problems relating to his heart. Scalia evidently had an MRI done of his shoulder and she is saying that Scalia wasn't a surgical candidate because of cardiac problems. Patients do have to go through a cardiac workup and be cleared by a cardiologist for surgery. Scalia evidently needed a rotator cuff surgery and was told that physical therapy would be best. Scalia needed rotator cuff surgery because he's an AVID TENNIS PLAYER according to the article. I went on the Internet to find other evidence that Scalia did play tennis and I did find several sources that confirmed it to be true. If the guy can play tennis, he sure doesn't have any heart problems. Another piece of the puzzle.
Off Topic: Scalia could have been playing tennis with a heart condition. People in general and men in particular hide conditions all the time out of denial or bieng macho. How do you think my tongue cancer got so bad?. Also one can can have a severe disease that does not present as severe. As s nurse this is necessary to know.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Either: a 79 year old man, considered too weak for surgery, died of natural causes, and the official bodies and his family decided an autopsy was unneccesary.
Or: a Supreme Court judge was bumped off somehow in order to make way for more abortions and fewer guns.
Is that about it?
_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.
You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.
I knew someone would bring this up. This is what I mean by thinking for yourself and asking questions and finding facts. I have several different news sources that I listen to and Michael Savage is one. So is Glenn Beck, Drudge, Alex Jones, Sean Hannity, and to a point Fox News and CNN. I will not listen to MSNBC. Even though I may listen to these sources I also pick and choose what I believe. I will listen then compare notes to the others. I will not believe anything if there is conflicting information. I find the big channels like CNN and Fox aren't going to tell the small bits of info that could be important. People always say they don't think these sources are credible, but Glenn Beck, Savage and Alex Jones will tell you what they know and then not to accept what they say as fact, but to research and make sure what they are saying is true.
About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.
If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.
Those are all crazy people. Glenn Beck is possibly clinically insane. Hannity is just an idiot. Alex Jones is a moron. Michael Savage is a professional angry person.
It's not possible to have a less controversial death. I bet his conscience finally had enough and strangled him. Good riddance to an ignorant piece of s**t.
I don't sleep with a pillow over my head. You? Nothing else is being explained so why should the pillow be explained? Maybe someone almost got caught.
There is NO EXCUSE for having no autopsy or toxicology.
No one on the Left is explaining anything that makes sense. You want to look the other way on this too, go ahead. That's what the Left ALWAYS does. Very convenient.
I think more than enough people here have explained why Scalia might have slept with a pillow over his head.
But you get your news from Michael Savage????? You do know that he's an autism denier, don't you?
I knew someone would bring this up. This is what I mean by thinking for yourself and asking questions and finding facts. I have several different news sources that I listen to and Michael Savage is one. So is Glenn Beck, Drudge, Alex Jones, Sean Hannity, and to a point Fox News and CNN. I will not listen to MSNBC. Even though I may listen to these sources I also pick and choose what I believe. I will listen then compare notes to the others. I will not believe anything if there is conflicting information. I find the big channels like CNN and Fox aren't going to tell the small bits of info that could be important. People always say they don't think these sources are credible, but Glenn Beck, Savage and Alex Jones will tell you what they know and then not to accept what they say as fact, but to research and make sure what they are saying is true.
About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.
If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.
None of those news sources are fact based. If you listen to nothing but rumors and falsehoods, how exactly do you have news. You have nonsense...

