Muslims say; religious freedom for me, but not for thee.
Strawman
Ad hominem
Tu quoque
You're hiding behind a system you really don't seem to grasp very well, instead of actually listening to what's being said. That along with a pattern of continually pointing out to everyone how skilled you think you are and what you perceive as their fallacies. I can certainly understand if you have developed tactics like these in trying to stay ahead of NT's, but you don't really need them as much or at all here. This is a place where you can actually fit in if you let yourself.
Im hoping at some point you will show me how I am using informal logical fallicies incorrectly
That would just lead to a protracted unproductive argument.
Alright. Well I hope you find peace somewhere down the line. I understand that it hasn't been easy for you.
Your concern is touching
Maybe you can share some of your experience inpeace with me.
I also really appreciate you sharing your vast knowledge concerning logic and logical fallacies.
Which ones have I used in my repy?
From the consistency of some of the comments attacking me, I suspect some level of organization among them. Certainly, it's a concerted, deliberate attempt to silence voices who expose their tactics.
If you quit, the terrorists win.
Im pretty sure half of them are what they refer to as "sock puppets", a different login, same person.
Ezra, Jacoby, adifferentname and Raptor all seem real. I wouldnt count on the rest.
Even so, they do all seem to jump on the bandwagon.
Haha if there's any two in PPR who seem similar in personality it's you and jrjones.
Nice!
Tu quoque - when critized you turn critizim back the other person to avoid addressing the concern.
Both Christianity and Islam should be judged on their moral value.
An intelligent observer will see that they both created intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions that they deny women and gays equality under the law. They also both grew themselves with the sword instead of good deeds and are therefore unworthy of being called moral ideologies.
Moral people will agree.
Regards
DL
Matthew 5:38You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’
39But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also; 40if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well;
Of course I don't think its right to keep Muslims out, but I have no problem reminding them that their sky fairy doesn't get preferential treatment around here
I don't hear conservatives crying about other notable art exhibits getting shut down over bomb threats. Of course, it's different when conservative christians deliver the threats.
True, partisanship plays a big role in what most of us get outraged about.
_________________
I'm a math evangelist, I believe in theorems and ignore the proofs.
(Disclaimer: I am a Hispanic non-fundamentalist Christian American. Also, please forgive the following verbosity, Aspies and all that...)
While I personally strongly dislike blanket statements about religions, I have to defend the OP's statement in this case. While religious intolerance is unfortunately widely practiced by many individuals in modern society, the criminalization of religious differences is almost exclusive to Muslim countries at the moment.
One interesting look at this is a 2014 Pew Research article (listed below) that specifically identified countries where apostasy (changing/leaving a specific faith) and/or blasphemy (speaking offensively or against a specific faith) were then criminalized. A quick comparison of their results with the countries with greatest percentages of individuals of the Muslim faith yields a stark pattern of agreement.
What's also intriguing though, is that the pattern appears to be even more closely related to the total number of Muslim individuals within a country (here admittedly relying on Wikipedia's statistics, please don't judge me
, link below) rather than simply percentage.
That said, there are, of course, counter examples such as Ireland's modern history of Christian terrorism and France's decidedly anti-Muslim "Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public" law and other regional laws banning other Muslim associated clothing articles.
However, the facts that these examples, and that even the US "president"'s banning of travelers from Muslim countries for "security" reasons (for the sake of argument, let's just go with that...) is enough to invite international protests and public condemnation, while hardly conclusive, seem to indicate that religious discrimination of Muslims is not as tolerated in the Christian West. In addition, there's the fact that the Latin/Roman Catholic Pope, the ostensive worldly leader of more that 50% of the world's Christians, has denounced discrimination against Muslims, especially of Muslim immigrants.
In any case, from a current legal standpoint, the OP does appear to be at least technically correct. While it's tempting to recall a history where Christians widely persecuted those of different faiths, times have definitely changed and to pretend that the past is the present is to ignore the amazing growth in consciousness and conscience that much of the world has experienced.
______________
"Which countries still outlaw apostasy and blasphemy?", Pew Research (2014) : pewresearch . org/fact-tank/2016/07/29/which-countries-still-outlaw-apostasy-and-blasphemy/
"Muslim World", Wikipedia (2017) : en.wikipedia . org/wiki/Muslim_world
(Sorry, I don't post a lot, so I'm not allowed to post whole links
)
Both Christianity and Islam should be judged on their moral value.
An intelligent observer will see that they both created intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions that they deny women and gays equality under the law. They also both grew themselves with the sword instead of good deeds and are therefore unworthy of being called moral ideologies.
Moral people will agree.
Regards
DL
Matthew 5:38You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’
39But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also; 40if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well;
But that is the case with most religions. They speak peace but humans skew the message to create hate and self inportance. It's why I remain spiritual without tying myself to a religion because they are all so fallible.
Also I would argue buddist is the most tolerant religion imo
Both Christianity and Islam should be judged on their moral value.
An intelligent observer will see that they both created intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions that they deny women and gays equality under the law. They also both grew themselves with the sword instead of good deeds and are therefore unworthy of being called moral ideologies.
Moral people will agree.
Regards
DL
Matthew 5:38You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’
39But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also; 40if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well;
While I personally strongly dislike blanket statements about religions, I have to defend the OP's statement in this case. While religious intolerance is unfortunately widely practiced by many individuals in modern society, the criminalization of religious differences is almost exclusive to Muslim countries at the moment.
One interesting look at this is a 2014 Pew Research article (listed below) that specifically identified countries where apostasy (changing/leaving a specific faith) and/or blasphemy (speaking offensively or against a specific faith) were then criminalized. A quick comparison of their results with the countries with greatest percentages of individuals of the Muslim faith yields a stark pattern of agreement.
What's also intriguing though, is that the pattern appears to be even more closely related to the total number of Muslim individuals within a country (here admittedly relying on Wikipedia's statistics, please don't judge me
That said, there are, of course, counter examples such as Ireland's modern history of Christian terrorism and France's decidedly anti-Muslim "Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public" law and other regional laws banning other Muslim associated clothing articles.
However, the facts that these examples, and that even the US "president"'s banning of travelers from Muslim countries for "security" reasons (for the sake of argument, let's just go with that...) is enough to invite international protests and public condemnation, while hardly conclusive, seem to indicate that religious discrimination of Muslims is not as tolerated in the Christian West. In addition, there's the fact that the Latin/Roman Catholic Pope, the ostensive worldly leader of more that 50% of the world's Christians, has denounced discrimination against Muslims, especially of Muslim immigrants.
In any case, from a current legal standpoint, the OP does appear to be at least technically correct. While it's tempting to recall a history where Christians widely persecuted those of different faiths, times have definitely changed and to pretend that the past is the present is to ignore the amazing growth in consciousness and conscience that much of the world has experienced.
______________
"Which countries still outlaw apostasy and blasphemy?", Pew Research (2014) : pewresearch . org/fact-tank/2016/07/29/which-countries-still-outlaw-apostasy-and-blasphemy/
"Muslim World", Wikipedia (2017) : en.wikipedia . org/wiki/Muslim_world
(Sorry, I don't post a lot, so I'm not allowed to post whole links
There is a massive difference between culture and religion of course the culture from another culture may not be tolerant. Its those cultures who are intolerant not the religion itself. American and british Muslims have a completely different culture.
Also if you want to talk about different Christianity focused cultures I would suggest looking towards Africa and your own texas where people are killed or shunned being homosexual. Or even the Westbaro baptist church (or however you spell it). Sure it's not all Christians but it is a certain Christian culture, it's the same for Muslims, same for Jewish etc
Even in Canada and the U.S.. The majority irrelevant when it is the minority leading the agenda. The majority of good Muslims are the ones putting their coin in the collection tray and funding the minority.
A statement like that needs a citation. And no, hate crime laws aren't commonly part of Sharia law.
Here is the Canadian experience and a bit of the U.S. experience.
https://www.nfb.ca/film/sharia_in_canada_part_1/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB6gps7dkUA
If you need more, Google Sharia and any country name and find all the citations you like.
Regards
DL
Yet in most lands where they get even a small minority, they try to have Sharia law implemented.
Even in Canada and the U.S.. The majority irrelevant when it is the minority leading the agenda. The majority of good Muslims are the ones putting their coin in the collection tray and funding the minority.
Regards
DL
A while ago, some Muslim radicals tried to set up a Sharia court in Ottawa. In response, there was a huge protest. It wasn't just conservatives protesting. There were feminists and moderate Muslims in the protest too.
In other words, Muslims have become nicely integrated into Canadian society. The rest of the West should follow Canada's example.
??
I hear what you are saying of some Muslims, but how can you say that Muslim are nicely integrated when they have factions who want to implement Sharia and are living it?
We have had too many cases of Honor killings.
Regards
DL
Of course I don't think its right to keep Muslims out, but I have no problem reminding them that their sky fairy doesn't get preferential treatment around here
Rather a tough sell when Canada and the U.S. give preferential treatment to Christianity with faith based schools.
Regards
DL
Both Christianity and Islam should be judged on their moral value.
An intelligent observer will see that they both created intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions that they deny women and gays equality under the law. They also both grew themselves with the sword instead of good deeds and are therefore unworthy of being called moral ideologies.
Moral people will agree.
Regards
DL
Matthew 5:38You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’
39But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also; 40if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well;
What you want is not what Christianity has ever been.
True that secular forces has brought Christianity to heel, but, let me repeat.
Both Christianity and Islam should be judged on their moral value.
An intelligent observer will see that they both created intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions that they deny women and gays equality under the law. They also both grew themselves with the sword instead of good deeds and are therefore unworthy of being called moral ideologies.
Moral people will agree.
Regards
DL
While I personally strongly dislike blanket statements about religions, I have to defend the OP's statement in this case. While religious intolerance is unfortunately widely practiced by many individuals in modern society, the criminalization of religious differences is almost exclusive to Muslim countries at the moment.
One interesting look at this is a 2014 Pew Research article (listed below) that specifically identified countries where apostasy (changing/leaving a specific faith) and/or blasphemy (speaking offensively or against a specific faith) were then criminalized. A quick comparison of their results with the countries with greatest percentages of individuals of the Muslim faith yields a stark pattern of agreement.
What's also intriguing though, is that the pattern appears to be even more closely related to the total number of Muslim individuals within a country (here admittedly relying on Wikipedia's statistics, please don't judge me
That said, there are, of course, counter examples such as Ireland's modern history of Christian terrorism and France's decidedly anti-Muslim "Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public" law and other regional laws banning other Muslim associated clothing articles.
However, the facts that these examples, and that even the US "president"'s banning of travelers from Muslim countries for "security" reasons (for the sake of argument, let's just go with that...) is enough to invite international protests and public condemnation, while hardly conclusive, seem to indicate that religious discrimination of Muslims is not as tolerated in the Christian West. In addition, there's the fact that the Latin/Roman Catholic Pope, the ostensive worldly leader of more that 50% of the world's Christians, has denounced discrimination against Muslims, especially of Muslim immigrants.
In any case, from a current legal standpoint, the OP does appear to be at least technically correct. While it's tempting to recall a history where Christians widely persecuted those of different faiths, times have definitely changed and to pretend that the past is the present is to ignore the amazing growth in consciousness and conscience that much of the world has experienced.
______________
"Which countries still outlaw apostasy and blasphemy?", Pew Research (2014) : pewresearch . org/fact-tank/2016/07/29/which-countries-still-outlaw-apostasy-and-blasphemy/
"Muslim World", Wikipedia (2017) : en.wikipedia . org/wiki/Muslim_world
(Sorry, I don't post a lot, so I'm not allowed to post whole links
My kingdom for such eloquence and temperment.
Regards
DL
Ethical systems sell themselves as people recognize them as such and naturally gravitate to what is best for them.
Yet both Christianity and Islam used force to grow their religions.
How is that ethical to you?
How is homophobia and denying women full equality ethical to you?
Regards
DL
Jesus said we would know his people by their works and deeds and he would not recognize either Christianity or Islam as his people.
Regards
DL
You are right. You need to understand however that a Christian is a follower of Christ. If someone claims to be a Christian that doesn't necessarily make him a Christian. In the end of the day you can see which people are the real Christians by their works and deeds. And boy there are so many people these days that say they are Christians but in reality aren't.
