Are there really more "mass shootings" in the U.S.?
I tell ya, get a concealed-firearm permit even if you don't own a firearm or ever plan to own one. Law-enforcement officers are a LOT nicer because: 1) they know you might be armed (so they engage gently), and 2) they like talking about which model firearms you have and engage in comparative chit-chat. Suddenly, that burned out tail light doesn't seem so bothersome to them.
I don't think I can do that because I am diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder. Even if I somehow legally could do it I wouldn't want to do it because I don't believe that anybody with a severe mental illness should be allowed to own a firearm.
If I really snapped one day during an controllable burst of mania and decided to shoot somebody out of anger I would not be able to live with myself after that. I would probably even be suicidal for the rest of my life because of the guilt I would feel after it.
In the United States, anyone (who isn't excluded by law) may purchase a concealed-firearm permit (and even a firearm, too, but the two aren't mutual required) regardless of disabilities. Of course, the choice is yours, and it seems you have given the idea some serious thought. That is what is so fantastic about the Second Amendment, it is completely optional.
If it wasn't for my medication I wouldn't be thinking clearly about something like that and that's what really scares me about myself.
I really do think we need better gun control laws because of that. Some people like myself should never be allowed to have guns.
Families of those who they believe to be a danger to themselves or others may, without even informing the individuals at risk of being a danger, seek a judicial determination that would prohibit the individuals at risk from possessing a firearm until such time another judicial court vacates (remove) the prior determination. That might be something to consider if someone like yourself wants to be so prohibited.
But what about the ones who don't have any family support? I think it would be better if we did a psychological evaluation on all potential gun buyers to make sure they can own a gun without being a threat to themselves or to others.
Yes, in the United States, a professional clinician of any kind, or a neighbor, religious adviser or the individual himself or herself, may petition a state court for proactive renunciation of the individual's Second Amendment rights.
And yet we still get mentally unbalanced people who somehow obtain firearms and shoot up schools, movie theaters, and shopping malls.
Obviously what we are doing to prevent that isn't enough so I firmly believe that we need to do more. I'm not saying we should take away everyone's guns because I do believe in our country's right to own guns, I just think we should put more of an effort into preventing tragedies like what happened at Columbine or the Century 16 movie theater or Las Vegas.
I mean face it, these types of crimes are happening way too frequently now.
Then, prosecute the individuals who commit those crimes. Almost half of U.S. citizens own firearms, and yet, day after day, their lawful firearms harm no one.
Do you really think simply prosecuting them is enough? That won't bring back the innocent lives that were destroyed or make the people who lost their loved ones feel better. I think finding ways of preventing it from happening again and again would be better.
What else can be done? And, what about those families and friends who have lost others because of all the other ways people experience unnatural deaths <https://gun-control.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=006767>? Maybe we shouldn't fixate on firearms so much in answering that question.
What else can be done? We can try to have better gun control laws! I mean seriously why are people so against that?
What exactly would satisfy your concerns, legislatively?
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
I tell ya, get a concealed-firearm permit even if you don't own a firearm or ever plan to own one. Law-enforcement officers are a LOT nicer because: 1) they know you might be armed (so they engage gently), and 2) they like talking about which model firearms you have and engage in comparative chit-chat. Suddenly, that burned out tail light doesn't seem so bothersome to them.
I don't think I can do that because I am diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder. Even if I somehow legally could do it I wouldn't want to do it because I don't believe that anybody with a severe mental illness should be allowed to own a firearm.
If I really snapped one day during an controllable burst of mania and decided to shoot somebody out of anger I would not be able to live with myself after that. I would probably even be suicidal for the rest of my life because of the guilt I would feel after it.
In the United States, anyone (who isn't excluded by law) may purchase a concealed-firearm permit (and even a firearm, too, but the two aren't mutual required) regardless of disabilities. Of course, the choice is yours, and it seems you have given the idea some serious thought. That is what is so fantastic about the Second Amendment, it is completely optional.
If it wasn't for my medication I wouldn't be thinking clearly about something like that and that's what really scares me about myself.
I really do think we need better gun control laws because of that. Some people like myself should never be allowed to have guns.
Families of those who they believe to be a danger to themselves or others may, without even informing the individuals at risk of being a danger, seek a judicial determination that would prohibit the individuals at risk from possessing a firearm until such time another judicial court vacates (remove) the prior determination. That might be something to consider if someone like yourself wants to be so prohibited.
But what about the ones who don't have any family support? I think it would be better if we did a psychological evaluation on all potential gun buyers to make sure they can own a gun without being a threat to themselves or to others.
Yes, in the United States, a professional clinician of any kind, or a neighbor, religious adviser or the individual himself or herself, may petition a state court for proactive renunciation of the individual's Second Amendment rights.
And yet we still get mentally unbalanced people who somehow obtain firearms and shoot up schools, movie theaters, and shopping malls.
Obviously what we are doing to prevent that isn't enough so I firmly believe that we need to do more. I'm not saying we should take away everyone's guns because I do believe in our country's right to own guns, I just think we should put more of an effort into preventing tragedies like what happened at Columbine or the Century 16 movie theater or Las Vegas.
I mean face it, these types of crimes are happening way too frequently now.
Then, prosecute the individuals who commit those crimes. Almost half of U.S. citizens own firearms, and yet, day after day, their lawful firearms harm no one.
Do you really think simply prosecuting them is enough? That won't bring back the innocent lives that were destroyed or make the people who lost their loved ones feel better. I think finding ways of preventing it from happening again and again would be better.
What else can be done? And, what about those families and friends who have lost others because of all the other ways people experience unnatural deaths <https://gun-control.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=006767>? Maybe we shouldn't fixate on firearms so much in answering that question.
What else can be done? We can try to have better gun control laws! I mean seriously why are people so against that?
What exactly would satisfy your concerns, legislatively?
Doing thorough background checks on the people who buy guns, making sure people cannot purchase or own a gun without a permit, not allowing people with a severe mental illness like Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia or people with a criminal history to own firearms, increasing more security in our schools to protect our children, and I think that's pretty much it.
Hell to be frank I wouldn't mind if guns were made completely illegal like over in Japan. They don't have problems like kids bringing guns to school to shoot up other kids because they're not as easy to obtain over there as they are here. Besides why do we even need the right for civilians to own firearms anymore? We made that law when we were fighting the British for control of our country because we did not have an actual military at the time and we were relying on a militia of farmers and hunters. Now we have one of the greatest militaries in the world and our government is so powerful that we don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of overthrowing them even if we really wanted to or had a good reason to.
I think it's just an obsolete amendment. That's my honest opinion.
Ban-Dodger
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Age: 1027
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,820
Location: Возможно в будущее к Россию идти... можеть быть...
I think this Reader's Digest article is worth quoting if you want to actually effectively decrease gun-violence...
Our reaction: I’m sorry, did you say you’re paying people not to kill one another? I thought so. Are you nuts?! What sort of message does this send?
But it worked! Ten years ago [2006], Richmond, California, a city of 104,000, had one of the highest murder rates in the country. Millions were spent on crime-prevention programs, but nothing worked. It go so bad the city council declared a state of emergency.
But since the town instituted a plan to pay the toughest gang members to follow a Life Map that would keep them out of trouble, the city’s murder rate dropped 77 percent from 2007—when the program was initiated—to 2014. During that period, homicides in the rest of the country rose.
The idea was the brainchild of DeVone Boggan, 49, the CEO of a youth-mentoring consultancy in nearby Oakland. Once his plan was approved by the city council, Boggan created the Office of Neighborhood Safety.
According to mother Jones, ONS staff members, most of them former felons, use police data as well as intelligence they gather on the street to determine the gang members most likely to kill or be killed.
Up to 50 gangbangers are offered a monthly stipend for nine months ranging from $300 to $1,000 to stick to their Life Map. Staff members help gang members attain a driver’s license or GED. They also arrange anger management classes, job training, and other specialty courses that might help them develop the skills needed to keep them off the streets. The better they do at avoiding trouble, the more money they make.
The thinking behind paying for good behavior is simple, criminologist Barry Krisberg told the Washington Post: “If you can’t stabilize their financial situation, they’ll go back to dealing dope, and drugs is a dangerous business.”
To be sure, other factors, such as gentrification and a new police chief who put a priority on community policing, are often cited as contributing to Richmond’s drop in crime. All these influences have combined to recast Richmond’s image as a modern Dodge City.
“Young men who are historically responsible for gun violence in this city are making better decisions about how they negotiate everyday conflicts,” Boggan told the Contra Costa Times.
Richmond’s mayor, Gayle McLaughlin, agrees: “[Our] old reputation is dying off”
Andy Simmons, May 2016 edition of Reader’s Digest, pp. 84-5.
_________________
Pay me for my signature. 私の署名ですか❓お前の買うなければなりません。Mon autographe nécessite un paiement. Которые хочет мою автографу, у тебя нужно есть деньги сюда. Bezahlst du mich, wenn du meine Unterschrift wollen.
Last edited by Ban-Dodger on 28 Sep 2018, 2:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
No thanks to all the above
Many would say aspire can’t own guns or anyone with any conditions, drink lots of coffee well your addicted so no guns for you. Hell your side says just wanting to own guns is a mental illness and so anyone who wants a gun wouldn’t be allowed to have one.
Why don’t you move to japan then. Oh wait they don’t like non Japanese there and you’d have to death with the organized crime problem and super high suicide rate.
Many would say aspire can’t own guns or anyone with any conditions, drink lots of coffee well your addicted so no guns for you. Hell your side says just wanting to own guns is a mental illness and so anyone who wants a gun wouldn’t be allowed to have one.
Why don’t you move to japan then. Oh wait they don’t like non Japanese there and you’d have to death with the organized crime problem and super high suicide rate.
Yeah you are so right. If I'm wanting things to change in my own country for what I think is best then I'm some kind of evil traitor who doesn't even love my own country and I should just abandon it and move somewhere else.
That was sarcasm btw.
I tell ya, get a concealed-firearm permit even if you don't own a firearm or ever plan to own one. Law-enforcement officers are a LOT nicer because: 1) they know you might be armed (so they engage gently), and 2) they like talking about which model firearms you have and engage in comparative chit-chat. Suddenly, that burned out tail light doesn't seem so bothersome to them.
I don't think I can do that because I am diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder. Even if I somehow legally could do it I wouldn't want to do it because I don't believe that anybody with a severe mental illness should be allowed to own a firearm.
If I really snapped one day during an controllable burst of mania and decided to shoot somebody out of anger I would not be able to live with myself after that. I would probably even be suicidal for the rest of my life because of the guilt I would feel after it.
In the United States, anyone (who isn't excluded by law) may purchase a concealed-firearm permit (and even a firearm, too, but the two aren't mutual required) regardless of disabilities. Of course, the choice is yours, and it seems you have given the idea some serious thought. That is what is so fantastic about the Second Amendment, it is completely optional.
If it wasn't for my medication I wouldn't be thinking clearly about something like that and that's what really scares me about myself.
I really do think we need better gun control laws because of that. Some people like myself should never be allowed to have guns.
Families of those who they believe to be a danger to themselves or others may, without even informing the individuals at risk of being a danger, seek a judicial determination that would prohibit the individuals at risk from possessing a firearm until such time another judicial court vacates (remove) the prior determination. That might be something to consider if someone like yourself wants to be so prohibited.
But what about the ones who don't have any family support? I think it would be better if we did a psychological evaluation on all potential gun buyers to make sure they can own a gun without being a threat to themselves or to others.
Yes, in the United States, a professional clinician of any kind, or a neighbor, religious adviser or the individual himself or herself, may petition a state court for proactive renunciation of the individual's Second Amendment rights.
And yet we still get mentally unbalanced people who somehow obtain firearms and shoot up schools, movie theaters, and shopping malls.
Obviously what we are doing to prevent that isn't enough so I firmly believe that we need to do more. I'm not saying we should take away everyone's guns because I do believe in our country's right to own guns, I just think we should put more of an effort into preventing tragedies like what happened at Columbine or the Century 16 movie theater or Las Vegas.
I mean face it, these types of crimes are happening way too frequently now.
Then, prosecute the individuals who commit those crimes. Almost half of U.S. citizens own firearms, and yet, day after day, their lawful firearms harm no one.
Do you really think simply prosecuting them is enough? That won't bring back the innocent lives that were destroyed or make the people who lost their loved ones feel better. I think finding ways of preventing it from happening again and again would be better.
What else can be done? And, what about those families and friends who have lost others because of all the other ways people experience unnatural deaths <https://gun-control.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=006767>? Maybe we shouldn't fixate on firearms so much in answering that question.
What else can be done? We can try to have better gun control laws! I mean seriously why are people so against that?
What exactly would satisfy your concerns, legislatively?
Doing thorough background checks on the people who buy guns, making sure people cannot purchase or own a gun without a permit, not allowing people with a severe mental illness like Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia or people with a criminal history to own firearms, increasing more security in our schools to protect our children, and I think that's pretty much it.
Hell to be frank I wouldn't mind if guns were made completely illegal like over in Japan. They don't have problems like kids bringing guns to school to shoot up other kids because they're not as easy to obtain over there as they are here. Besides why do we even need the right for civilians to own firearms anymore? We made that law when we were fighting the British for control of our country because we did not have an actual military at the time and we were relying on a militia of farmers and hunters. Now we have one of the greatest militaries in the world and our government is so powerful that we don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of overthrowing them even if we really wanted to or had a good reason to.
I think it's just an obsolete amendment. That's my honest opinion.
Criminal-history reviews for receiving a concealed-firearm permit or purchasing a firearm are as strong as they can be given that federal ADA and privacy laws prohibit denying an applicant for either because of disability. Now, applicants who have been convicted of certain alcohol-, drug- or violence-related crimes are already prohibited to apply for a firearm or concealed-firearm permit under federal laws. Many disabled people including those who are blind (yes, they compete and enjoy competitive shooting sports by using computerized equipment).
Increasing security at public schools is irrelevant to this discussion. I can see both sides of the matter, but a lot of educators in my state are already lawfully able to carry a concealed firearm in case they need to protect their students.
It is true that Japan has a universal prohibition on firearms by the civilian population, but, as a nation, it is far from safe given its knife and sword attacks which is seen in abundance there. Death is death. Does it really matter how an innocent person is murdered?
Why do we need civilian owned firearms? I weigh 120-lbs. at 5'7". About the size of many women. Because I am an LGBTQ autist, how much defense could I or a similarly sized woman muster? But, add a lawful firearm, and FBI statistics show that most violent criminals piss themselves and run when they see a defensive firearm aimed in their direction. For anyone, this fact is the best reason to have and possess a concealed firearm for defensive purposes.
Having been an adviser to the U.S. Office of the Attorney for the District of Utah, I learned how crime-prevention measures only prevent FUTURE crimes (and not so well, at that), and hate-crime laws punish the perpetrators AFTER they commit their crimes. Having the ability to prevent an imminent violent assault WHEN IT HAPPENS is the difference between life and death. But, nobody is forcing others to possess firearms. It is completely optional.
If the Second Amendment is obsolete, which other constitutional amendments are similarly obsolete? Many people say that the Second Amendment applies only to muskets and cannons. Does the First Amendment apply only to quills and parchment ... making Internet privacy, e-mail messages and private communications nonexistent?
No, there is still room for the Second Amendment to provide personal security in lawful ways.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
I guess you have a point when it comes to women. My Mom had to buy a handgun to protect herself because she was having problems with an abusive ex-husband who was stalking her and threatening her. A gun is the only way a small female can really protect herself against a much larger man.
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
Yep, at the moment you need defense, you will be glad you have it. Even 'tweens have watched their parents get attacked, ran to where the firearm is kept, returned to face down and incapacitated the attacker. One 11-year-old girl protected her younger brother alone with their parents' firearm while 9-1-1 advised the girl to shoot IF the man broke their bedroom door. He did, she did, and two kids are still alive.
Yes, I am sorry to suggest taking a firearm class. My mistake. I apologize. Your mother sounds like a Mama Grizzly to me!
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
Yep, at the moment you need defense, you will be glad you have it. Even 'tweens have watched their parents get attacked, ran to where the firearm is kept, returned to face down and incapacitated the attacker. One 11-year-old girl protected her younger brother alone with their parents' firearm while 9-1-1 advised the girl to shoot IF the man broke their bedroom door. He did, she did, and two kids are still alive.
Yes, I am sorry to suggest taking a firearm class. My mistake. I apologize. Your mother sounds like a Mama Grizzly to me!
I once had a crazy junky break into our house while my Mom was staying in Georgia and I hid in my bedroom terrified with a knife all night because if they came into my room I was prepared to defend myself.
But then one time I got into a physical fight with my Mom's ex-husband and after that I realized that I am a very physically weak person (us guys can be weak no matter how large we are if we don't work out which I never do lol).
Maybe I need to try and exercise and build muscle or even take a self defense class so that if I'm ever in trouble I can protect myself.

And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
Yep, at the moment you need defense, you will be glad you have it. Even 'tweens have watched their parents get attacked, ran to where the firearm is kept, returned to face down and incapacitated the attacker. One 11-year-old girl protected her younger brother alone with their parents' firearm while 9-1-1 advised the girl to shoot IF the man broke their bedroom door. He did, she did, and two kids are still alive.
Yes, I am sorry to suggest taking a firearm class. My mistake. I apologize. Your mother sounds like a Mama Grizzly to me!
I once had a crazy junky break into our house while my Mom was staying in Georgia and I hid in my bedroom terrified with a knife all night because if they came into my room I was prepared to defend myself.
But then one time I got into a physical fight with my Mom's ex-husband and after that I realized that I am a very physically weak person (us guys can be weak no matter how large we are if we don't work out which I never do lol).
Maybe I need to try and exercise and build muscle or even take a self defense class so that if I'm ever in trouble I can protect myself.

If you are unarmed, call 9-1-1 if you can, then shout to the attacker in the loudest, most angry, voice you have, "I AM ARMED AND I WILL SHOOT," and find the nearest baseball or cricket bat (they are universally legal and frightening to anybody of any height and weight). The knife you got is a good idea, but requires you to get up close and personal, where a bat gives you some room to swing from a distance.

_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
Yep, at the moment you need defense, you will be glad you have it. Even 'tweens have watched their parents get attacked, ran to where the firearm is kept, returned to face down and incapacitated the attacker. One 11-year-old girl protected her younger brother alone with their parents' firearm while 9-1-1 advised the girl to shoot IF the man broke their bedroom door. He did, she did, and two kids are still alive.
Yes, I am sorry to suggest taking a firearm class. My mistake. I apologize. Your mother sounds like a Mama Grizzly to me!
I once had a crazy junky break into our house while my Mom was staying in Georgia and I hid in my bedroom terrified with a knife all night because if they came into my room I was prepared to defend myself.
But then one time I got into a physical fight with my Mom's ex-husband and after that I realized that I am a very physically weak person (us guys can be weak no matter how large we are if we don't work out which I never do lol).
Maybe I need to try and exercise and build muscle or even take a self defense class so that if I'm ever in trouble I can protect myself.

If you are unarmed, call 9-1-1 if you can, then shout to the attacker in the loudest, most angry, voice you have, "I AM ARMED AND I WILL SHOOT," and find the nearest baseball or cricket bat (they are universally legal and frightening to anybody of any height and weight). The knife you got is a good idea, but requires you to get up close and personal, where a bat gives you some room to swing from a distance.

Lol my Mom also told me that I should have called 911 but I had called her instead because I have a really bad habit of calling her during an emergency. I guess I'm scared to call 911 because I've never done it before but believe me I will next time if somebody ever breaks into my house again.
And I think I'll try your advice next time something like that happens. Thanks!

And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
Yep, at the moment you need defense, you will be glad you have it. Even 'tweens have watched their parents get attacked, ran to where the firearm is kept, returned to face down and incapacitated the attacker. One 11-year-old girl protected her younger brother alone with their parents' firearm while 9-1-1 advised the girl to shoot IF the man broke their bedroom door. He did, she did, and two kids are still alive.
Yes, I am sorry to suggest taking a firearm class. My mistake. I apologize. Your mother sounds like a Mama Grizzly to me!
I once had a crazy junky break into our house while my Mom was staying in Georgia and I hid in my bedroom terrified with a knife all night because if they came into my room I was prepared to defend myself.
But then one time I got into a physical fight with my Mom's ex-husband and after that I realized that I am a very physically weak person (us guys can be weak no matter how large we are if we don't work out which I never do lol).
Maybe I need to try and exercise and build muscle or even take a self defense class so that if I'm ever in trouble I can protect myself.

If you are unarmed, call 9-1-1 if you can, then shout to the attacker in the loudest, most angry, voice you have, "I AM ARMED AND I WILL SHOOT," and find the nearest baseball or cricket bat (they are universally legal and frightening to anybody of any height and weight). The knife you got is a good idea, but requires you to get up close and personal, where a bat gives you some room to swing from a distance.

Lol my Mom also told me that I should have called 911 but I had called her instead because I have a really bad habit of calling her during an emergency. I guess I'm scared to call 911 because I've never done it before but believe me I will next time if somebody ever breaks into my house again.
And I think I'll try your advice next time something like that happens. Thanks!

Oh, I hope it doesn't happen again!

Yeah, calling 9-1-1 can get law enforcement officers and others to you faster. Just stay on the line, and they will tell you what you need to do.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
And I suppose you're right about the stabbings and beatings in Japan. If people want to kill somebody they're going to find a way to do it with or without guns. So I guess in the end it's pretty pointless to try and prevent murder.
But I really don't think armed teachers are enough to protect students. What we need is professional guards with actual training when it comes to dealing with armed criminals. Teachers are trained to teach, not stop homicidal maniacs from shooting up the school.
Oh and for the record I DO love my country and it really angers me when anyone suggests otherwise just because I disagree with their opinion. Nobody will EVER tell me to leave my own country just because I have a problem with some of the things we do here.
Actually, in my state at least, a concealed-firearm permit course involves actual shooting, advice about shooting, the relevant laws (what is lethal force, etc.). And most educators with CFPs immediately sign up for tactical training because: 1) they enjoy their new sport, and 2) want to be as careful and accurate and possible, especially with students around. In Utah, we call the mothers and armed teachers of students "mama grizzlys."
Women are notoriously accurate (see Annie Oakley) and can drop a man like nobody's business!
I had a friend who completed his CFP training not because he wanted the permit or a firearm, but to "get over" his fear of firearms. It worked, and he was a pretty good shot, too! You might want to explore the sport with a beginners class.
I gotta admit that is pretty cool to know. My Mom took shooting lessons too and she's pretty good at it. She actually owns three handguns herself. She used to be against them too but when she was having problems with her ex husband a psychiatrist explained to her that a gun is the best protection a woman can have.
But I just don't think I would ever be OK with learning to shoot or having a gun. Like I said I have a real mental illness and I'm against the idea of people who are mentally ill having guns. And if I ever went off my medicine and I completely snapped and decided to shoot somebody I would never be able to live with myself. I would hope that I was given the death penalty for it even though I know we don't execute murderers with a proven mental illness.
Yep, at the moment you need defense, you will be glad you have it. Even 'tweens have watched their parents get attacked, ran to where the firearm is kept, returned to face down and incapacitated the attacker. One 11-year-old girl protected her younger brother alone with their parents' firearm while 9-1-1 advised the girl to shoot IF the man broke their bedroom door. He did, she did, and two kids are still alive.
Yes, I am sorry to suggest taking a firearm class. My mistake. I apologize. Your mother sounds like a Mama Grizzly to me!
I once had a crazy junky break into our house while my Mom was staying in Georgia and I hid in my bedroom terrified with a knife all night because if they came into my room I was prepared to defend myself.
But then one time I got into a physical fight with my Mom's ex-husband and after that I realized that I am a very physically weak person (us guys can be weak no matter how large we are if we don't work out which I never do lol).
Maybe I need to try and exercise and build muscle or even take a self defense class so that if I'm ever in trouble I can protect myself.

If you are unarmed, call 9-1-1 if you can, then shout to the attacker in the loudest, most angry, voice you have, "I AM ARMED AND I WILL SHOOT," and find the nearest baseball or cricket bat (they are universally legal and frightening to anybody of any height and weight). The knife you got is a good idea, but requires you to get up close and personal, where a bat gives you some room to swing from a distance.

Lol my Mom also told me that I should have called 911 but I had called her instead because I have a really bad habit of calling her during an emergency. I guess I'm scared to call 911 because I've never done it before but believe me I will next time if somebody ever breaks into my house again.
And I think I'll try your advice next time something like that happens. Thanks!

Oh, I hope it doesn't happen again!

Yeah, calling 9-1-1 can get law enforcement officers and others to you faster. Just stay on the line, and they will tell you what you need to do.
Luckily that was the only time that had ever happened to me and this was actually a girl my mom knew. She stayed with us the night before and my mom told her she had to leave and when my Mom was gone to Georgia she decided she was going to break into our garage in the middle of the night and help herself to my Mom's jewelry and she even tried to steal her guns too. She also brought some guy with her to help out.
I was really afraid and my Mom felt very bad about leaving me home alone when that happened so we installed a security system.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
New Orleans mass prison escape |
16 May 2025, 10:54 pm |
Florida State University Mass Shooting |
19 Apr 2025, 5:25 am |
South Carolina beach town mass shooting |
26 May 2025, 6:57 pm |
North Carolina House Party Mass Shooting |
02 Jun 2025, 12:07 am |