16 Sep 2008, 10:23 pm
monty wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Im just trying to figure out what you think it is?.. the only difference between a creationist and an evolutionist is that it's on the opposite side of the coin.
One side of the coin is evolution. The other side includes creationism, Hindu creation myths, Stories of Zeus and Aphrodite, Native American stories about a Giant Turtle that Formed our World, and all other non-rational, non-provable literature.
*farts*
.. by the way natives dont think a giant turtle formed our world, usually the story is about a serpent alien God..
16 Sep 2008, 10:26 pm
17 Sep 2008, 3:17 am
17 Sep 2008, 6:42 am
ShawnWilliam wrote:
monty wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Im just trying to figure out what you think it is?.. the only difference between a creationist and an evolutionist is that it's on the opposite side of the coin.
One side of the coin is evolution. The other side includes creationism, Hindu creation myths, Stories of Zeus and Aphrodite, Native American stories about a Giant Turtle that Formed our World, and all other non-rational, non-provable literature.
*farts*
.. by the way natives dont think a giant turtle formed our world, usually the story is about a serpent alien God..You just don't want to teach both sides of the story.
17 Sep 2008, 7:39 am
17 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
17 Sep 2008, 12:01 pm
monty wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
monty wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Im just trying to figure out what you think it is?.. the only difference between a creationist and an evolutionist is that it's on the opposite side of the coin.
One side of the coin is evolution. The other side includes creationism, Hindu creation myths, Stories of Zeus and Aphrodite, Native American stories about a Giant Turtle that Formed our World, and all other non-rational, non-provable literature.
*farts*
.. by the way natives dont think a giant turtle formed our world, usually the story is about a serpent alien God..You just don't want to teach both sides of the story.
lol.. creationism has NOTHING to do with giant turtles. You go ahead and tell your fake madeup story.
17 Sep 2008, 12:11 pm
17 Sep 2008, 12:21 pm
17 Sep 2008, 12:26 pm
17 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
twoshots wrote:
chever wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Phagocyte wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
the only difference between a creationist and an evolutionist is that it's on the opposite side of the coin.
The difference is that one is evidence-based science and the other is complete faith. Not only are they actually two different coins, but they are also probably sitting in different change drawers.
no the evolution theory is a non-proven theory
Yeah it's science and therefore always unproven by definition; I hope you have a point
Unless it's a fact.
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/ ... heory.html
gee, how pretty.. I should make one of those.
and it is NOT fact..
what about prehistoric beasts still being alive today?.. if I find a terredactal (sp?) in Africa, will you believe me? or a prehistoric whale in the sea?... That is what it all boils down to.. they dont teach things that are uncommon in the school classroom, do they?.. no, they teach crap. If it's not in the textbooks, then it does not exist, and therefor does not effect the evolution theory.
Last edited by ShawnWilliam on 17 Sep 2008, 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
17 Sep 2008, 12:29 pm
17 Sep 2008, 12:40 pm
ShawnWilliam wrote:
what about prehistoric beasts still being alive today?.. if I find a terredactal (sp?) in Africa, will you believe me? or a prehistoric whale in the sea?... That is what it all boils down to.. they dont teach things that are uncommon in the school classroom, do they?.. no, they teach crap. If it's not in the textbooks, then it does not exist, and therefor does not effect the evolution theory.
(Does not debunk evolution)
17 Sep 2008, 12:40 pm
ShawnWilliam wrote:
twoshots wrote:
chever wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Phagocyte wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
the only difference between a creationist and an evolutionist is that it's on the opposite side of the coin.
The difference is that one is evidence-based science and the other is complete faith. Not only are they actually two different coins, but they are also probably sitting in different change drawers.
no the evolution theory is a non-proven theory
Yeah it's science and therefore always unproven by definition; I hope you have a point
Unless it's a fact.
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/ ... heory.html
gee, how pretty.. I should make one of those.
and it is NOT fact..
what about prehistoric beasts still being alive today?.. if I find a terredactal (sp?) in Africa, will you believe me? or a prehistoric whale in the sea?... That is what it all boils down to.. they dont teach things that are uncommon in the school classroom, do they?.. no, they teach crap. If it's not in the textbooks, then it does not exist, and therefor does not effect the evolution theory.
I don't see how finding a supposedly extinct animal would demonstrate anything except that it wasn't really extinct. In fact, animals turn up sometimes that were thought to be extinct, e.g. the coelocanth.
17 Sep 2008, 12:42 pm
See previous post
btw, I found out it's 'coelacanth' today; I was under the impression that it were 'coelocanth' until today too
17 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
