The Truth AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH: 2016 Election

Page 63 of 114 [ 1815 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 ... 114  Next

cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

11 Aug 2016, 7:44 pm

"i heard" is just as good as fox's famous opener, "some people say."

i don't watch TV news at all. i listen to NPR sometimes and peruse the www daily.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,217
Location: the island of defective toy santas

11 Aug 2016, 7:48 pm

I've refused to watch anything on f*x since the early 90s. I will not in any way patronize a business that is doing its best to ruin America.



Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

11 Aug 2016, 8:12 pm

Nurseangela,

The study was done in New Jersey. The Telegraph is just reporting on that. Why does it matter that it is a British newspaper? Well here's an American source that have compiled many more studies to back that up:

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/foxs_mi ... on_effect/

Also I have told you before liberals tend to hate CNN too. And MSNBC's biggest show is Morning Joe which is hosted by a former Republican Representative. But that's besides the point, I don't typically get my news from any of those places anyway. It's my guess that the majority of people who watch mainstream news now are older people and people who are only casually interested in politics. The study showed the breakdown of the audiences for the other mainstream news sources were fairly well spread out among the ideological spectrum.



pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

11 Aug 2016, 9:09 pm

nurseangela wrote:
pcuser wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
cathylynn wrote:
fox news won a lawsuit where they were being accused of lying about (milk, i think) by asserting that they don't have to tell the truth because they are entertainment, not news. google it.

I wish some legal brain would figure out a way to get them to choose one or the other and not keep pretending their right-wing "newsy" entertaining untruths are really factual news.

I heard that Fox wanted to open a similar operation in Canada and they were told to not bother as they enforce their law that a news program cannot lie. They didn't fight it as it was true...


Wait, I'm not done. Here we have another "I heard". I heard, I heard, I heard. Where is the proof, or did you hear this from all the voices in your head? Learn how to debate cause you are wasting my time.

Next.

Sorry, Angela, I never said it was a fact I had verified. It was simply a comment I made. However, the source I heard it from is extremely reliable and accurate, so it probably is true. We also have or had a law similar to Canada's law. It was stopped being enforced because your deity Ronald Reagan did away with too many regulations...



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,217
Location: the island of defective toy santas

11 Aug 2016, 9:13 pm

I miss the fairness doctrine. :|



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

11 Aug 2016, 9:32 pm

auntblabby wrote:
I miss the fairness doctrine. :|



me, too. if bernie got half the airtime trump gets, things would have turned out differently.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,217
Location: the island of defective toy santas

11 Aug 2016, 9:44 pm

cathylynn wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I miss the fairness doctrine. :|



me, too. if bernie got half the airtime trump gets, things would have turned out differently.


but the "fix" was in. :|



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

11 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm

auntblabby wrote:
I miss the fairness doctrine. :|

It would be an unenforceable mess. Bad idea.



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

11 Aug 2016, 10:07 pm

AspE wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I miss the fairness doctrine. :|

It would be an unenforceable mess. Bad idea.


even if not perfect, it would be an improvement over what happened this year.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,217
Location: the island of defective toy santas

11 Aug 2016, 11:04 pm

cathylynn wrote:
AspE wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I miss the fairness doctrine. :|

It would be an unenforceable mess. Bad idea.


even if not perfect, it would be an improvement over what happened this year.

if It was rigorously enforced, it would KILL f*x n*ws :D



Meistersinger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,700
Location: Beautiful(?) West Manchester Township PA

12 Aug 2016, 12:24 am

Personally, the American TV News Media (Faux, CNN (and their sister, HLN), MS-NBC/Comcast, PBS, ABC/Disney, CBS, TEGNA, Sinclair, Hearst and Tribune Broadcasting, among others), can go f!ck themselves. IMNSHO, the only unbiased Broadcast News Operation right now is the BBC World Service (and I'm rather suspect of their coverage also). In short, I trust NOBODY!



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

12 Aug 2016, 12:49 am

cathylynn wrote:
even if not perfect, it would be an improvement over what happened this year.


This is something I can't ever figure out about liberals generally, the naive assumption that whatever regulation they're proposing won't be controlled by jerks who use it selectively to reward and punish according to their ideology, or more cynically, whoever pays them or pisses them off. I feel the same way about "hate speech" laws, aka secular blasphemy laws, where even a casual amount of research (and/or common sense) will reveal that they are overwhelmingly used to target the powerless and unpopular, the very people such laws are allegedly designed to protect.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

12 Aug 2016, 8:23 am

auntblabby wrote:
if It was rigorously enforced, it would KILL f*x n*ws :D

Fox is cable TV, not public airwaves, the government can't tell them what to do, even theoretically.



nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

13 Aug 2016, 6:39 pm

OOPSIE !

Pelosi warns colleagues of harassing calls and messages. http://tiny.iavian.net/br73


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

14 Aug 2016, 3:49 pm

Nurse Angela, this is especially for you as you love cats. Here's a dog you might like. If not, you can let your cat fight the dog. Enjoy the focus group all about BIG T...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Mubuns ... e=youtu.be



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

15 Aug 2016, 11:06 pm

Trump just gave a complete foreign policy speech that set out many details of his plans and proposals. It's certainly worth listening to.

As a speaker, he isn't an orator in the way that Reagan was, or Bill Clinton and Obama sometimes are, but this was well delivered and clearly set out. I think he will get better at this particular kind of speaking, which isn't his natural one, as time goes on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIfTKOWAWt8


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!