donnie_darko wrote:
huh oddly that is true. though i kind of suspect that 1) the gospel writers added that part in or 2) hell was actually just a metaphor and the gospel writers totally got it wrong
I think that positing 1 undermines the historical basis of faith though. The reason being that if authors are doctoring major doctrines in the religion, then who is to say that much of the religion itself isn't a result of various people corrupting it? I mean, I suppose you could try fideism, but I don't see the point.
2 is the best bet.