Page 1 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

08 Jun 2010, 10:42 pm

Why????

It cost so many lives not just from both sides but "collateral damage" people who are killed for no given reason which gives a various definition of either mass murder or murder given for no reason except for a cause.

Why? When I served in a military for a short amount of time I could not understand not even in the name of nationalism or protection. It almost seems like protection means nothing these days except oil and world-wide trade.

I have to ask, why in the U.S. are people so enthusiastiastic in going to war. Do you think the message is unclear or not clear enough? Don't get me wrong, I respect and feel for soldiers but why do they need to serve in order to show their honor? This war thus far has been nothing but confusing and destructive. I have seen nothing good come out of any war this generation.

I'm sorry if you people have kids and anyone serving in war. I just have to vent. I can't contemplate. My brother and other some family members are still affected by war.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,398
Location: Houston, Texas

08 Jun 2010, 10:45 pm

Isn't there already a thread about this?


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


Overkill
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 82

08 Jun 2010, 10:49 pm

I don't really think Americans are [/i]that[i] enthusiastic for war anymore. Maybe more so than other countries, but isn't there a majority opposition to the war in Afganistan according to polls at this point?



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

09 Jun 2010, 12:16 am

I don't think that Americans were ever enthusiastic about war. Crap was started with us that we have to finish if we are going to defend our national security. If there wasn't currently a necessity to be at war I doubt anyone would support it.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


silentbob15
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 802

09 Jun 2010, 1:04 am

John_Browning wrote:
I don't think that Americans were ever enthusiastic about war. Crap was started with us that we have to finish if we are going to defend our national security. If there wasn't currently a necessity to be at war I doubt anyone would support it.

I agree, nobody in their right mind wants to go off so strange country,
get shot at or possibly die, but sometimes war is a necessary evil,



peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

09 Jun 2010, 2:08 am

people make a lot of money from it


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


mjs82
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,166

09 Jun 2010, 4:41 am

why not?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Jun 2010, 5:43 am

It is what humans are best at doing.

ruveyn



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,801
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Jun 2010, 5:55 am

war [and warmaking prowess] is not something to be proud of.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Jun 2010, 5:58 am

auntblabby wrote:
war [and warmaking prowess] is not something to be proud of.


One of the reasons I am alive is that the U.S. fought the Nazis. If that had not happened I might very well have ended up as a cake of soap on some Nazi's bathroom sink. The men who fought and sometimes died on the Normandy beaches did more for me than I ever did for them. My Dad (U.S. Navy) and men of his generation wrecked the fascists and ground their faces into the mud and rubble.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

09 Jun 2010, 6:40 am

ruveyn wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
war [and warmaking prowess] is not something to be proud of.


One of the reasons I am alive is that the U.S. fought the Nazis. If that had not happened I might very well have ended up as a cake of soap on some Nazi's bathroom sink. The men who fought and sometimes died on the Normandy beaches did more for me than I ever did for them. My Dad (U.S. Navy) and men of his generation wrecked the fascists and ground their faces into the mud and rubble.

ruveyn


There are more economic ways to make soap and I doubt the Nazis were that interested in cleanliness. The Russians too the brunt of the Nazi war effort and it was the Russian defeat of them that knocked them off.



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

09 Jun 2010, 7:45 am

Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
war [and warmaking prowess] is not something to be proud of.


One of the reasons I am alive is that the U.S. fought the Nazis. If that had not happened I might very well have ended up as a cake of soap on some Nazi's bathroom sink. The men who fought and sometimes died on the Normandy beaches did more for me than I ever did for them. My Dad (U.S. Navy) and men of his generation wrecked the fascists and ground their faces into the mud and rubble.

ruveyn


There are more economic ways to make soap and I doubt the Nazis were that interested in cleanliness. The Russians too the brunt of the Nazi war effort and it was the Russian defeat of them that knocked them off.


Though forget not that the Soviets were allied to the Nazis, helped train the military they used to invade various stretches of Europe, mirrored Nazi aggression to take large stretches of Poland and provided all manner of goods and supplies to Germany up until the very last moment (and trains were still rolling in one direction when the Panzers were rolling in the other.) Until the Germans alienated them by unwarranted and counter-productive aggression, many of the citizens of Russia openly welcomed German "liberators" from Communist oppression. (The Germans even found areas where the local populace were unknown to the Soviet government who still thought that the Tzars were running things. These people were clearly not Bolsheviks.).

The Russians did take a substantial part of the German war-effort, but they subsequently took cynical advantage of their role as "liberators" on return to take and hold vast swathes of Europe that were not theirs, and to administer those areas for much longer than the Nazis did, and often with a similarly harsh regime. Some nations subject to Nazi rule were treated more freely than similar states under the Soviets. Likewise the Russian military responded to (admittedly incredibly harsh) German occupation in kind with mass rape and murder of German citizens.

They also kept German POWS far longer than allowed by any convention, simply to utilize the skills the Russians lacked, and treated their own freed POWs as "enemies of the state" often with more disregard for human life than they used against the German ones.

Perhaps most cynically, the early alliance was created despite the very clear and unambiguous evidence that the Nazis fully intended to subjugate and destroy Bolshevism and Slavic peoples in general. This was no secret. Stalin and Molotov were totally aware of it. Yet they created an alliance, even when Germany was no threat to them militarily. They assisted Germany in becoming a threat to them. They even tried to play both sides, by offering to support Poland AGAINST Germany, on the provisio that they could move across Poland to do so. It would be naieve to believe, in the light of later activities, that the Poles would have got any land "moved across" back.

Basically the Russians were playing games with fire for their own ends, got burnt, and responded.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

09 Jun 2010, 8:33 am

Nobody's defending the purpose or the means of the USSR or why they screwed around with the Nazis. But they did the major whacking and considering their general standards of neatness I doubt they were interested in soap production.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Jun 2010, 11:58 am

Sand wrote:


There are more economic ways to make soap and I doubt the Nazis were that interested in cleanliness. The Russians too the brunt of the Nazi war effort and it was the Russian defeat of them that knocked them off.


I am the beneficiary of war against the fascists.

ruveyn



Wedge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 984
Location: Rendezvous Point

09 Jun 2010, 5:20 pm

Iraq has the second largest identified oil reserves in the world. That pretty much explain the reasons behind the war. Or maybe that was an enormous coincidence. Western oil companies are going to get exclusive contracts to drill Iraq oil.



Overkill
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 82

09 Jun 2010, 6:47 pm

John_Browning wrote:
I don't think that Americans were ever enthusiastic about war. Crap was started with us that we have to finish if we are going to defend our national security. If there wasn't currently a necessity to be at war I doubt anyone would support it.



There wasn't a necessity to be at war with Iraq though, and most Americans initially supported that war.