Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 

Dennis
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: Ohio

31 Oct 2010, 12:28 am

With the 2010 election coming up, I've been thinking about political issues.

Despite the Democrats being pretty bad in a lot of ways I have a hard time disliking them anywhere near as much as I do the Republican Party, especially in its current form. Candidates like O'Donnell, Angle, and Paul are some of the most unlikable I've ever seen. I pretty much dislike everything the party stands for and says.

It seems a lot of the Republican Party's social positions are inherently contradictory with their economic ones. If abortion was illegal, then you'd have a bigger population and a lot of those people would be on welfare. And if someone's just getting an abortion because they're an irresponsible ass who doesn't feel like raising a kid, then they probably won't turn out to be much of a parent and crime rates will probably go up.

Republican positions on crime aren't so logical either. I'm not completely against the death penalty but with legal costs the death penalty is more expensive than a life sentence. The often ridiculous drug laws have miserably failed and cost a lot of money too.

Then there's the deficit. Republicans complain about the deficit, but Republicans haven't cut the deficit in a long time. Nowadays they seem to prefer cutting taxes but still spending a lot. Cutting taxes and lowering the deficit would be really hard and the spending cuts that would be required would probably never pass.

If anything the Tea Party type candidates's positions are even more ridiculous. Rand Paul thinks businesses should be able to choose to be whites only. I'm sure that would improve the economy a lot(actually it would lead to more failed businesses, more vandalized or destroyed businesses, and various other problems). And even if Paul is just really anti-government power and not racist, that makes me wonder why the hell he'd run for a government job with government health care if he hates the government so much. Also, he ran as a fringe candidate but immediately whored himself out to the Republican establishment as soon as he won the nomination.

Christine O'Donnell...everybody knows she's an idiot at this point. But I don't know how people who are worried about the economy nominated a woman who can't pay her mortgage, taxes, or campaign costs in the first place. And as for Angle, I don't think a woman who uses quote marks when saying autism should be anywhere near our health care.

I don't know if the Democrats have done much good or if they deserve re-election. But I'm astounded to see so much of the voting public willing to go back to politicians that are encouraging the same policies or even dumber ones than the policies that screwed the country for years. Also confused to see people who think the economic problems can be blamed on the Democrats without any of it going to the Republicans. The people who are really responsible for the problems are all the corrupt corporate bastards. Some of them have certainly been on the Democrat's side(Freddie Mac and Fanni but others are on the Republican's.

I don't know why we only have two viable parties, and the country may be screwed no matter which one is in charge.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

31 Oct 2010, 1:07 am

I wonder if the Koch Brothers who bankroll the Tea Party are in fact Communist agents out to undermine Capitalism as they got their fortune from Stalin who gave that family the break that allowed them to amass the fortune that let them bankroll the Tea Party. Also, Ayn Rand was also from the Soviet Union and her ideas are also destructive to capitalism. So she may have been a Communist agent too.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,276
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Oct 2010, 6:38 am

repubs generally are elitists and like to bully others they consider to be inferior to themselves.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Oct 2010, 7:06 am

auntblabby wrote:
repubs generally are elitists and like to bully others they consider to be inferior to themselves.


And Pinko, Stinko Democrat Liberals don't?

ruveyn



Dennis
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: Ohio

31 Oct 2010, 10:03 am

You just kind of made his point by using a communist term for democrats. It's really pretty absurd what passes for "communist" in this country when we're still far to the right of the socialist European democracies which all seem to do better than us in education, crime rate, and other things now.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Oct 2010, 11:25 am

Dennis wrote:
You just kind of made his point by using a communist term for democrats. It's really pretty absurd what passes for "communist" in this country when we're still far to the right of the socialist European democracies which all seem to do better than us in education, crime rate, and other things now.


I know the difference between a pinko, stinko Democrat liberal and a communist.

ruveyn



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,276
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Nov 2010, 12:32 am

ruveyn wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
repubs generally are elitists and like to bully others they consider to be inferior to themselves.


And Pinko, Stinko Democrat Liberals don't?


you think i am a bully? you think i feel superior to anybody else on earth? you are clueless.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Nov 2010, 12:35 am

auntblabby wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
repubs generally are elitists and like to bully others they consider to be inferior to themselves.


And Pinko, Stinko Democrat Liberals don't?


you think i am a bully? you think i feel superior to anybody else on earth? you are clueless.


No.. I just think I am superior to you.

ruveyn



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,276
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Nov 2010, 3:02 am

ruveyn wrote:
I am superior to you.


that is not a really big deal, in the grand scheme of things. why is it important enough for you to remind me of it? your big brain does realize that there are people who are enormously superior to both of us, so wouldn't you rather be superior to these folk than just to little ol' me?



Dennis
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: Ohio

04 Nov 2010, 7:39 am

Pinko means communist.



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

04 Nov 2010, 8:27 am

Dennis wrote:
You just kind of made his point by using a communist term for democrats. It's really pretty absurd what passes for "communist" in this country when we're still far to the right of the socialist European democracies which all seem to do better than us in education, crime rate, and other things now.


Its interesting what one can afford when one does not pay their share of the cost of providing international security.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Nov 2010, 9:31 am

Dennis wrote:
Pinko means communist.


No. It means a communist or socialist sympathizer. One who is sympatico with the Reds. Many squooshy soft liberals and bleeding hearts are not communists but are sympathetic to the ends of the communists which is to have equal sharing of the wealth.


ruveyn



Dennis
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: Ohio

05 Nov 2010, 6:29 pm

91, what aspect of international security are you speaking of?