iamnotaparakeet wrote:
In argumentation, has anyone noticed that if a person makes a statement that might indicate an association with a more extreme perspective that others often assume that they hold that extremist view and treat them with ridicule according to their opinions and psittacisms regarding that perspective.
Example:
Person 1: I think employers like Wal-Mart suck.
Person 2: You hate capitalism!! ! You must be a communist! Communist!! Blacklist them immediately!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !
Goodness yes, being on the recieving end with about half my posts.
And I find this to be about the worst and most intolerant and abusive forum Ive ever been on.
Of course I can sympatise with thier point of view, but why do they have to resort to insults, If I am wrong about a view, wouldnt it be better to show me evidence of the error of my thinking that I might adjust it?in the same way that Iam offering my views and knowledge that others may not know of, that they might adjust thier viewpoint.
I abhour lies and deciept, even ones that would benifit me, I would have thought all Aspies would have prized truth, but see Iam wrong and that some get angrey when any viewpoint that differs from thier own is offered.
The original question is an expression of such an insult by accussing somebody of supporting an ideology just because they offer an alternative view on it, not for a minute considering that the person might just be an impartial devotee of truth for its own sake.
For instance with me, living in the West, I get the constant anti-Muslim propogander, suicide bomber, terrorist etc etc, so I looked into it myself, read the Koran, read the Hadiths, looked at the truth being all this Muslims are terrorists stuff, and consequently get people asking me if Iam becoming a Muslim or something.