pandabear wrote:
Meh, he came up with too many rules. Who can follow them all? Most are downright silly.
He was also a bit temperamental at times.
I think technically the many rules (six hundred and thirteen I think... Ruyven will correct me if I'm wrong) were actually applications of the Big Ten, which you could say are extrapolations of the Big Two (Love the Lord your God with all your heart, and soul, and mind and strength, love your neighbour as yourself.) So, look after your neighbour's donkey if he's injured... even if you hate your neighbour, don't take it out on his animal. That's to do with loving your neighbour (hard to do when he's a git, which is why we're given the "little laws" to show us what that looks like. So, don't sleep with your wife's mother... that's to stop misery in the family home. The dietary laws and the laws related to hygiene, quarantine, etc safeguarded health, and some of them (such as insisting that animals for human consumption be in good physical condition) have the secondary affect of being proto versions of animal welfare. But as far as I can tell things like not mingling cloths from different coloured animals are more symbolic than anything, or even a bit aspie. One point of the Law could well be that we can't keep it, we have to turn to God for help to walk like Him.
I prefer the idea that there is only one Law, love, on which hang all the law and the prophets.
Anyway, as Gentiles we're not bound by the Mosaic law... though as I recall there are seven Noahdic laws (is that even a word?)
To answer the question... Moses, I really like him. Nowadays he'd probably be diagnosed with something, but look what he achieved. He was instrumental in forging a nation. He might have been awkward, aspie, stuttering, difficult to get along with, and with a bad temper to boot (he even argued with God) but he was a great man for all that.