Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

jmnixon95
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,931
Location: 미국

06 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm

I get to see a talk of his tomorrow. :D



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Feb 2011, 6:27 pm

jmnixon95 wrote:
I get to see a talk of his tomorrow. :D


If you will, please post a short summary of his talk.

ruveyn



jmnixon95
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,931
Location: 미국

06 Feb 2011, 6:29 pm

ruveyn wrote:
jmnixon95 wrote:
I get to see a talk of his tomorrow. :D


If you will, please post a short summary of his talk.

ruveyn


Not a problem; I plan on taking some notes.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

06 Feb 2011, 6:47 pm

What is this talk about? That's actually rather interesting, as Dan Dennett is a bit of an intellectual hero to me.



jmnixon95
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,931
Location: 미국

06 Feb 2011, 6:49 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
What is this talk about? That's actually rather interesting, as Dan Dennett is a bit of an intellectual hero to me.


The one that I'm attending is entitled "My Brain Made Me Do It"; here is the description:

Quote:
Neuroscientists have recently begun making public pronouncements about the implications of their research for free will and moral responsibility. These have been typically confused, but their confusion is in large measure due to the disarray in philosophy, which has discouraged careful thinking among neuroscientists. Philosophers should turn to the large task of undoing the damage.


The one he is giving on Tuesday (which I cannot attend due to school) is 'The Human Mind as an Upside-Down Brain".

Quote:
Imagining the mind as the brain is fiendishly difficult, and several eminent failures of imagination here are instructive. Both Darwin and Turing proposed a "strange inversion of reasoning" that is one of the keys, I will claim, to opening up the space of imaginable cognitive architectures. Once we understand that the "moving parts" of our brains are themselves tiny agents with agendas, operating in a competitive architecture, we can see- sketchily- the way our minds can be lodged in our brains.


I really wish I could attend both. Badly, I wish.