Study: Snakes Lost their Legs Through Evolutionary Time

Page 1 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Wedge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 984
Location: Rendezvous Point

12 Feb 2011, 1:56 pm

8 February 2011

Studying how snakes got legless
By Jonathan Amos
Science correspondent, BBC News


Image
The snake would have slithered along the ground during the Late Cretaceous


A 95-million-year-old fossil is helping scientists understand how snakes lost their legs through evolutionary time.

Found in Lebanon, the specimen is one of only three examples of an ancient snake with preserved leg bones. One rear leg is clearly visible but researchers had to use a novel X-ray technique to examine another leg hidden inside the fossil rock. Writing in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, the team says the snake records an early stage in limb loss.

The scientists' high-resolution 3D images suggest the legs in this particular species, Eupodophis descouensi, grew more slowly, or for a shorter period of time. It is a conclusion made possible only after seeing all the bones obscured inside the limestone, and determining that although the creature possessed ankle bones, it actually had neither foot nor toe bones. "This study reveals the degree of regression of the legs," said Dr Alexandra Houssaye from the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN) in Paris, France.


Image
Revealed: Scientists see features on the scale of a few micrometers


"This could not be clearly determined based only on the visible leg, as some tiny bones such as ankle and foot bones might have been broken or removed from the surface. However, as all the second leg was preserved in the rock, we can now be almost completely sure of the degree of resorption of the leg," she told BBC News. Current evidence suggests that snakes started to evolve less than 150 million years ago. Two theories compete. One points to a land origin in which lizards started to burrow, and as they adapted to their subterranean existence, their legs were reduced and lost - first the fore-limbs and then the hind-limbs. The second theory considers the origin to be in water, from marine reptiles.

This makes the few known bipedal snakes in the fossil record hugely significant, because they could hold the clues that settle this particular debate. But Dr Houssaye says Eupodophis descouensi of itself cannot resolve such arguments. "This study does not enable us to choose between the two hypotheses," she told BBC News. "In fact, a true answer might not be brought before 10 years. "That is why our role now is to try to get as much information as possible from the few important fossil remains we have. Hind-limbed snakes are key fossils in this debate and that is why we really need to study them in detail."

The BBC was with Dr Houssaye in 2008 when she took the fossil to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France. The machine produces a brilliant X-ray beam that can pierce just about any material, revealing its inner structure in incredibly fine detail. For this study, the fossil snake was clamped to an inclined table and rotated in front of the X-ray beam. In a process known as computed laminography, many hundreds of 2D images were produced which were then woven, with the aid of a smart algorithm, into a detailed 3D picture. The scientists can see features on the scale of a few micrometers.


Image
A finger points to the visible leg of the ancient snake


Eupodophis descouensi was just under a metre long. It would have slithered along the ground during the Late Cretaceous, when dinosaurs still roamed the Earth. It is unlikely the animal would have used the legs for moving, although it is possible they could have served some other function. In a number of modern snakes, such as boas and pythons, tiny "spurs" are evident near their rear ends that are used as grippers during sex. The Eupodophis descouensi fossil was unearthed near the Lebanese village of al-Nammoura and was first described in 2000. Its remains are divided across the two interior faces of a thin limestone block that has been broken apart. A portion of the vertebral column is missing; and in the process of preservation, the rear end - with the legs - became detached and positioned near the head. "It will be interesting to make comparisons now with other fossil specimens but also with [living] lizards and snakes with regressed pelvic and limb elements," Dr Houssaye said.


From BBC News: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12393387



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

12 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm

I saw something about this once in a documentary about snakes. Apparently, there's another animals in which we see this happening in right now but I can't remember what it was.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

12 Feb 2011, 5:05 pm

Likely cetaceans - some - I THINK not all, but don't quote me - whales and dolphins have bones toward the rear of the body where hind legs ought to be.



montjuic
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jun 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 183

12 Feb 2011, 5:07 pm

you can quite clearly see a finger in that fossil as well



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

12 Feb 2011, 5:17 pm

Philologos wrote:
Likely cetaceans - some - I THINK not all, but don't quote me - whales and dolphins have bones toward the rear of the body where hind legs ought to be.


That was probably it.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

13 Feb 2011, 2:37 am

Doesn't the bible say snakes lost their legs in Genesis?



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

13 Feb 2011, 3:15 am

As punishment for luring Eve to eat from the Tree Of Knowledge, yes. They also lost the ability to speak, according to the Bible.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


mightypen515
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 143

13 Feb 2011, 3:35 am

It was a girl.



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

13 Feb 2011, 9:44 am

mightypen515 wrote:
It was a girl.


The snake? IF so, you gotta know your herpetology.

Or did I miss something?



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

13 Feb 2011, 9:46 am

So that snake must have lived some time before the snake that spoke to Eve.

It does seem harsh, doesn't it? Only one snake did it, and all species of snake had their legs cut off.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

13 Feb 2011, 11:55 am

pandabear wrote:
So that snake must have lived some time before the snake that spoke to Eve.

It does seem harsh, doesn't it? Only one snake did it, and all species of snake had their legs cut off.


Are you being serious?

ruveyn



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

13 Feb 2011, 12:05 pm

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
So that snake must have lived some time before the snake that spoke to Eve.

It does seem harsh, doesn't it? Only one snake did it, and all species of snake had their legs cut off.


Are you being serious?

ruveyn


Even I - el humorlessoso - can calculate the odds on that one.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

13 Feb 2011, 3:45 pm

"Any snake wishing to remain in Ireland, please raise your right hand."

St. Patrick



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

13 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Doesn't the bible say snakes lost their legs in Genesis?
omg yes. but, to be more specific I dont think the "snake" you are thinking of is the reptile.


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

13 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm

Modern-day boas still possess vestigial leg buds.

http://www.synapses.co.uk/evolve/lec3i.html



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

13 Feb 2011, 7:37 pm

Philologos wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
So that snake must have lived some time before the snake that spoke to Eve.

It does seem harsh, doesn't it? Only one snake did it, and all species of snake had their legs cut off.


Are you being serious?

ruveyn


Even I - el humorlessoso - can calculate the odds on that one.


Well, weren't we all just waiting for someone to interject a comment from a Creationist perspective?

The Bible fails to mention that snakes were also punished by having their eyelids removed.

An obvious question is: if only one snake did the dirty deed, then why are there so many species of snakes alive today, nearly all of whom are unable to talk, and all of whom have no legs? Obviously they didn't arise via evolution. That would open up the possibility that chimpanzees and orangutans shared in Adam's sin. So, snake evolution never happened.