Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 

DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

01 Mar 2011, 3:32 pm

Anyone who Knows Jacksh** about politics knows about George Orwell. George Orwell has plenty of fans who are libertarians or conservatives. Even Conservapedia regards George Orwell as a Conservative thinker. I wish I was making this up.

http://conservapedia.com/George_Orwell (scroll to the bottom)

Even white supremacists like George Orwell. They say that holocaust denial is a “thoughtcrime” in places where it is illegal. I am not sh**ing you. I have proof.

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

George Orwell was, in fact, a socialist. If there are any right-wingers still reading this, here are two actual quotes by George Orwell that prove just how much he disagreed with you.

“My recent novel [Nineteen Eighty-Four] is NOT intended as an attack on Socialism or on the British Labour Party (of which I am a supporter), but as a show-up of the perversions . . . which have already been partly realized in Communism and Fascism. . . . The scene of the book is laid in Britain in order to emphasize that the English-speaking races are not innately better than anyone else, and that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph anywhere.”

“...I saw a little boy, perhaps ten years old, driving a huge carthorse along a narrow path, whipping it whenever it tried to turn. It struck me that if only such animals became aware of their strength we should have no power over them, and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the proletariat.”


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

01 Mar 2011, 3:56 pm

He intended to espouse the virtues of big government and socialism in his book which instead showed why big government and socialism are bad.



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

01 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
He intended to espouse the virtues of big government and socialism in his book which instead showed why big government and socialism are bad.


No, it doesn't show why big government is bad.

A single party state isn't the same thing as a 'big' government. Ingsoc didn't allow people to disagree with it - the Labour party did.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

01 Mar 2011, 4:02 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
He intended to espouse the virtues of big government and socialism in his book which instead showed why big government and socialism are bad.


maybe you don't know what socialism means?



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

01 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm

Earlier we had Sand saying I could not agree with as liner of poetry its wtriter disagreed with.

Now a rightist cannot see Orwell is talking fo true because Orwell was socialist?

Truth does not work that way. Sorry. I have known people who assumed you HAVE to disagree with EVERYTHING your political adversary says,

But SOME are not that DUMB. I will agree with the truth wherever it sits.;



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

01 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm

Quote:
maybe you don't know what socialism means?


[x]


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

01 Mar 2011, 5:11 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
He intended to espouse the virtues of big government and socialism in his book which instead showed why big government and socialism are bad.


maybe you don't know what socialism means?


I thought Socialism is collective ownership and management of the means of production.

What is your definition?

ruveyn



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

01 Mar 2011, 6:34 pm

ruveyn wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
He intended to espouse the virtues of big government and socialism in his book which instead showed why big government and socialism are bad.


maybe you don't know what socialism means?


I thought Socialism is collective ownership and management of the means of production.

What is your definition?

ruveyn


well its not an all or nothing proposition or dogma like Stalinism.
Not all socialists are about consolidation of power.
really just the marxists

most are about free association and equal power relationships.
local descion making and the decentralization of power.

like in that horrible place denmark :wink:
the most important level of government is the county.

a good number of socialists are anti-statist and reject force completly.

-Jake



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

01 Mar 2011, 11:51 pm

Philologos commented this about me.

Quote: Earlier we had Sand saying I could not agree with as liner of poetry its wtriter disagreed with.

For someone claiming to be educated and competent this is a most strange way to demonstrate it.