Mandatory abortions in case of rape
Hey, so we still do not have abortion in over 50% of the threads in PPR's page , so how about a new thread about it?.
I'd like to mention, today I heard about a serial rapist that got three women pregnant. Because of the horribly religious people in here, the abortion idea was not even considered. This means that we will have three little monsters as off-spring from this guy, so he basically won in his fight to spread his genes. I find it disgusting.
Why allow rapists to breed? Should society really become responsible for kids that were the cause of a rapist? How about this idea that is noticeably not pro-choice anymore but pro-abortion. Let us make abortion mandatory. Optimally making victims take a "day after" pill after they file the report, or else, if the report was late, making them go through the procedure. The result? Less rapists reproducing. How about that?
_________________
.
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
I wouldn't support making it mandatory, simply because women should have control over their own bodies and forcing them to undergo that, when they don't want it, shortly after they've been forcibly violated by a rapist, would mentally scar most women for life and probably cause a lot of suicides. I would support mandatory provision of free morning-after pills or ru-486 for any woman that wanted it, in part because of the psychological damage of rape and subsequent pregnancy to the woman and in part because of the possibility (never proven afaik) that there is any genetic component to rape.
One of my best friends is the result of exactly that situation and she is a fantastic human being. Though she has lived in a small town and with the stigma of it her entire life she is a highly successful woman. Vex, your idea is not very good.
_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.
no more, please!!
That is a good early solution. I think claiming emergency contraception is like an abortion would really be stretching it for the anti-abortion crowd
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Rape is one of the best arguments for a womans choice to have an abortion; some parents pressure their children into a decision for abortion, that results in a great deal of psychological damage to the young woman. Enforcing abortion when a pregnancy is wanted can be as psychologically damaging as preventing an abortion from an act of rape.
I'd like to mention, today I heard about a serial rapist that got three women pregnant. Because of the horribly religious people in here, the abortion idea was not even considered. This means that we will have three little monsters as off-spring from this guy, so he basically won in his fight to spread his genes. I find it disgusting.
Why allow rapists to breed? Should society really become responsible for kids that were the cause of a rapist? How about this idea that is noticeably not pro-choice anymore but pro-abortion. Let us make abortion mandatory. Optimally making victims take a "day after" pill after they file the report, or else, if the report was late, making them go through the procedure. The result? Less rapists reproducing. How about that?
Your argument presupposes that there is rape has its roots in specific genes, and is not just an unfortunate exaptation of an otherwise important gene triggered by a unlikely series of environmental events. It also presupposes that these genes have strong correlation to rape or that there is so much rape that weak correlations add up significantly.
I understand where you are coming from, but constructing an argument from "first principles" without accounting for things like the short time spans we observe, weakness of correlation and the possible absence of "rape genes" and using it as a basis for harsh social policy is pretty illogical.
Not really. My friend is anti-abortion, and offers quite a consistent position in claiming the intentional destruction of a potential human being is immoral, on day one or in the third trimester.
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
[quote="ryan93]Your argument presupposes that there is rape has its roots in specific genes, and is not just an unfortunate exaptation of an otherwise important gene triggered by a unlikely series of environmental events. It also presupposes that these genes have strong correlation to rape or that there is so much rape that weak correlations add up significantly.[/quote]
I don't think that's the case. The presupposition only has to be that it's possible that there's a genetic root for rape, combined with the fact that most women would rather cut out their uterus with a dull knife than endure a pregnancy caused by a rapist. The two add up to a significant reason to provide free emergency contraception to rape victims.
I was about to respond, but I see there is no need to in light of this:
QFT.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
I don't think that's the case. The presupposition only has to be that it's possible that there's a genetic root for rape, combined with the fact that most women would rather cut out their uterus with a dull knife than endure a pregnancy caused by a rapist. The two add up to a significant reason to provide free emergency contraception to rape victims.[/quote]
There is no specific scientifically identified genetic root for rape so it couldn't be used as a reason to fund free emergency contraception to rape victims. I don't think the government would fund it because it is technically a means of abortion, but maybe a non-profit organization against violence against women could provide funding for something like this, given a woman's choice to accept the day after pill because of rape. Do you know if private insurance companies cover the day after pill?
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
Mandatory abortion is about as ethically justifiable as mandatory pregnancy and childbirth.
That is to say, IT ISN'T.
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.
This is factually not accurate. You might be confusing 'Plan B,' aka 'the morning after pill,' aka 'emergency contraception,' with ru-486, aka 'the abortion pill.' The Catholic church notwithstanding, Plan B is contraception, not an abortion. It does not work if a pregnancy already exists.
As for private insurance, I don't know for sure (I thankfully rarely have to deal with billing, and never with insurance), but I imagine that it's different from company to company.
I'm not against providing the morning after pill; I'm against forcing people to take it on the the assumption that some strong Darwinian mechanism is going to lead to a world populated by rapists.
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
Yeah sounds like a good compromise. I don't think why isn't it already like that. Oh, I know, 'pro-life' people.
I don't think there is a genetic component of rape, but I do think there is some sort of impulse to get heritage inside the mind of a rapist, so in a way letting him get away with breeding makes him sort of win. I think the last thing we need is more people in this world and if we are going to increase the population let it not be through forced measures like rape...
_________________
.
Last edited by Vexcalibur on 17 Mar 2011, 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
No but abortion isn't killing anyone.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
I'd like to mention, today I heard about a serial rapist that got three women pregnant. Because of the horribly religious people in here, the abortion idea was not even considered. This means that we will have three little monsters as off-spring from this guy, so he basically won in his fight to spread his genes. I find it disgusting.
Why allow rapists to breed? Should society really become responsible for kids that were the cause of a rapist? How about this idea that is noticeably not pro-choice anymore but pro-abortion. Let us make abortion mandatory. Optimally making victims take a "day after" pill after they file the report, or else, if the report was late, making them go through the procedure. The result? Less rapists reproducing. How about that?
Pro-choice is one thing, but forcing the person to get an abortion is another.
Whether the woman was impregnated voluntarily or involuntarily the fetus is still a human life.
It's unfortunate for the woman, and the criminal needs to be held accountable, but it's not fair to take an innocent life for expedience.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
CA Proposes Law to Allow AZ Doctors to Perform Abortions |
22 Apr 2024, 6:50 pm |
I guess Iran wants to limit abortions to increase populatio. |
03 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm |
Harvey Weinstein’s NY rape conviction overturned |
Today, 4:49 am |
SCOTUS Begins Hearing Arguments In OR Homelessness Case |
22 Apr 2024, 6:59 pm |