Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

dionysian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 921
Location: Germantown, MD

27 May 2011, 6:09 am

Sounds scary. I wonder what it actually means...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/us/27patriot.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1306494224-S13PugSSYHDBMiflx6rQWA


_________________
"All valuation rests on an irrational bias."
-George Santayana

ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL
BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS


Adam-Anti-Um
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 707
Location: West Sussex, UK

27 May 2011, 6:18 am

The patriot act is completely unconstitutional anyway. We are steadily moving into a police state. The establishment has no choice but to do that coz of the global collapse that we're sprinting towards.


_________________
"We can spend the rest of our existences stomping on the ants that are mysteriously coming out from under the refridgerator, or we can remove the spoiled food behind it which is causing the infestation to begin with." - Peter Joseph


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

27 May 2011, 7:59 am

Every state moves toward police state, fot 'tis their nature to - balanced or annulled by the tendency of humanity in toto to resent / resist / subvert control.

What bothers me as a sign of the time far more than the content of any act or group of acts is the increasing tendency to bring into the sphere of government terminology such party slogans as Patriot Act, Making Work Pay Credit, No Child Left Behind, and Restoring American Financial Stability Act.

I would be much happier in a world where rulers checked their mouths at the door and switched on their brains, plugging in their responsibility modules, before starting work.



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

27 May 2011, 9:06 am

Quote:
Could you be more vague?
========================

"... rushing to enact legislation to prevent a lapse in several of the federal government’s investigative powers under the Patriot Act that were set to expire at midnight.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/us/27patriot.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1306494224-S13PugSSYHDBMiflx6rQWA

Oh, they just need/want/pretend to update a license or two ... :roll:


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Adam-Anti-Um
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 707
Location: West Sussex, UK

27 May 2011, 10:08 am

Philologos wrote:
Every state moves toward police state, fot 'tis their nature to - balanced or annulled by the tendency of humanity in toto to resent / resist / subvert control.

What bothers me as a sign of the time far more than the content of any act or group of acts is the increasing tendency to bring into the sphere of government terminology such party slogans as Patriot Act, Making Work Pay Credit, No Child Left Behind, and Restoring American Financial Stability Act.

I would be much happier in a world where rulers checked their mouths at the door and switched on their brains, plugging in their responsibility modules, before starting work.


I couldn't agree more. However human leaders are now obsolete. The world would be a far better place without the need for them at all.


_________________
"We can spend the rest of our existences stomping on the ants that are mysteriously coming out from under the refridgerator, or we can remove the spoiled food behind it which is causing the infestation to begin with." - Peter Joseph


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

27 May 2011, 9:12 pm

And with that I could not agree more.



psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

27 May 2011, 9:56 pm

Philologos wrote:
I would be much happier in a world where rulers checked their mouths at the door and switched on their brains, plugging in their responsibility modules, before starting work.

You'll need a governmental system that rewards them for responsibility, rather than a system that just rewards them for pandering to voters' prejudices, then.



Adam-Anti-Um
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 707
Location: West Sussex, UK

27 May 2011, 10:08 pm

psychohist wrote:
You'll need a governmental system that rewards them for responsibility, rather than a system that just rewards them for pandering to voters' prejudices, then.


The abscence of the need for leaders in the sense that I'm talking about implies a value system that doesn't lead to a replacement need for any alternative means of governance. For more information here is where I'm coming from.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mkRFCtl2MI[/youtube]


_________________
"We can spend the rest of our existences stomping on the ants that are mysteriously coming out from under the refridgerator, or we can remove the spoiled food behind it which is causing the infestation to begin with." - Peter Joseph