College-life a liberalism?

Post Reply New Topic

I just recently came upon this question: Is college-life a liberalism? I find the answer to this question a yes, because college represesents a freedom. And like Diogenes' philosophy that nothing in life is more important than the building of the self, we can conclude that college-life is a cynic society, because it represents Diogenes' philosophy. This freedom is such that the student is able to build their own morals and philosophies, while taking parental teachings to be not of their own. They make their own believes based on what they study, because college allows the student to infer what is in the material based on how they understand it. Didn't Vladimir Lenin study at a school to gain his philosophy? Although this was in the comfort of his home, we must refer to the etymology of 'college'.

Fascinating post! But I must digress...

If this is to mean that college (as in the tradition of the university) represents a place of great freedom, where great debates take place between students and professors and those students reach their own conclusions then I would have to say that no, this is a falsehood. The modern university, as in the modern liberal arts, appears more inclined generally (and naturally there are exceptions), to tell a single version that is assumed to be correct. Critical thinking is less dominant, and is only emphasized when used by the orthodoxy to attack the non-orthodoxy.

It is no accident that more then thirty years after the "free speech movements," students who wish to engage in political demonstrations at universities led by those who believe in the same ideals of that are required to do so in "free speech zones."

EDIT: The American community college is by all accounts, however, a wonderful institution.

Liberalism being defined as (1.) The state or quality of being liberal and liberal being defined as relative freedom? Yes, I suppose we say that college tends to be a state of relative freedom for most people, not all of course. I would advise against using the term "liberalism" though, as in the most common usage this denotes a political ideology, as well, for some reason "a liberalism" sounds funny to me, but grammar is one of my weaknesses.

I would disagree with the idea that college is a cynic society. The reason is that cynics reject most or all traditional ideas and view self-control and virtue as the important aspects of existence. Colleges do not reflect this, as they do not cause most students to reject tradition at all, only modify pre-existing biases, as well, college does not imbue students with the moral philosophy of the cynics.

A college can be anywhere, but like most words college has multiple definitions. The definition that most assume that you refer to is an academic institute, which must only be viewed as an academic institute with attributes defining it as a college. A home can only be a college though if it doubles as an institute.

Let me response after thinking about my own response.

I believe I did not address you precisely. You spoke about a word not an institution.

I wish to state that clearly.

After proper digestion...

I believe you are correct, dgd1788, with qualifications in the first case and correct in the absolute in the second.

"Is college-life a liberalism? "
===================

yes, people living off other peoples production and produce nothing themselves

liberals= non-productive members of society

C'mon now dude, even I wouldn't go that far. There have been liberals I've respected, and if anything, this most recent election has given me hope that the Democratic party has gotten its s**t straight and may actually bring something new to the table - which we were in sore need of under a stagnant, neo-conservative government.

[quote="Johnnie
yes, people living off other peoples production and produce nothing themselves

liberals= non-productive members of society[/quote]

You could say the same thing about the majority of thr "ruling class". Many people in our society produce nothing. Students, at least, only do this temporarily.

A machine can do the engineering also and be told to build other machines to effectively put everyone out of work. The human will become obsolete and the machines will wipe them all out.

" WE "

are you part of some elite group of eggheads or what

I said Blue Collar.

Engineers, Artists, Thinkers and Philosophers can never be replaced. For the measure of a civilization is not the technology it leaves behind, for that will be become ancient and primitive to the next generation but art communicates on a universal level that never goes out of style.