ValentineWiggin wrote:
Using the woman as a scapegoat is silly.
If the state refuses to provide access to reproductive control,
FAS is the state's fault,
not that of women who drink.
You say that as if it's the state's responsibility to make sure women don't get pregnant unintentionally. That's what's referred to as a
nanny state. I don't know from where you get your code of ethics, but I personally consider people to be responsible
for their own actions. At what point does the state cease to be responsible in your eyes? If I jump off a cliff and die, was it the state's fault for not being there to prevent me from doing so?
Anyway, you are basing your argument on the assumption that contraception is not readily available. I don't know what it's like where you live, but condoms are extremely cheap and readily available at every petrol station where I am. Was it the state's responsibility to go out and buy condoms for these women and hand-deliver them on a silver platter?
ValentineWiggin wrote:
Private ownership of the means of production is theft
If I buy flour, water and an oven, and using these I bake a loaf of bread which I sell to someone, who am I stealing from exactly?