Page 1 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

19 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm

A lot of people want the Midle East to be more like the developed world. The neoconservatives want to wage war against the Middle East until it agrees to be like the developed world wheras a lot of people on the far-left want the Middle East to be part of some "world unity". To me this is like bullying someone or nagging them until they agree with you. The neoconservatives say, "we should kick their asses until they act like us." while the far-left says, "we shouldn't beat them, we should evangelize those brutal heathens!"

I have previously shown on this site that Islamofascism arose because people in the Middle East were afraid the Middle East becoming more like the developed world and neoconservatism has only made it worse.
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt167771.html

I am beginning to see that our world is becoming like the one in Nineteen Eighty-Four. in Nineteen Eighty-Four there are three countries that are always at war. In our world the three "countries" are the democratic world, the Islamic world and the socialist dictatorships. In Nineteen Eighty-Four Oceania is at war with Eastasia one minute and at war with Eurasia the next. I recall that not so long ago the democratic world was at war with the socialist dictatorships (I.E. the Soviet Union) and now we are at war with the Islamic world. The socialist dictatorships haven't disappeared, they have just changed from. They used to be Soviet Russia and now they are China and North Korea. What is going to happen when too many people realize that the war against the Middle East is a sham? The democratic world will declare war against the socialist dictatorships again. As we fight the Middle East, China becomes more and more powerful - preparing for war.

We need to just leave the Middle East alone. In trying to create world unity we are participating in perpetual war. How much blood are we willing to shed for world unity?


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

19 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm

World unity? Forget that, I'd rather make it possible for people to leave this world into space than deal with the bloody politics of "unification" which will be nothing but murder of those who don't want "unity".



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

19 Jul 2011, 11:38 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
World unity? Forget that, I'd rather make it possible for people to leave this world into space than deal with the bloody politics of "unification" which will be nothing but murder of those who don't want "unity".


And then in time, everyone who goes into space with you will find a reason to hate and kill one another. It's human nature, baby!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

19 Jul 2011, 11:47 pm

Lol it goes much deeper than that just read the book Economic Hit Man...lets just say it can be traced back to deals between you know rich bastards and rich bastards. I am too tired to go into a lot of detail...I have been having to think about some pretty deep things because of school assignments. I am taking psychology and sociology so yeah my brain is tired and I am thinking about having a drink and starting on my essay tommorow instead of tonight.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Jul 2011, 6:10 am

As long as the U.S. is addicted to oil we cannot leave the middle east alone.

The best way for the U.S. to get out of the middle east is to undertake a vast project of generating our electricity by means of nuclear fission. We have enough domestic petroleum to serve as a chemical feed stock for long polymers.

ruveyn



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

20 Jul 2011, 12:51 pm

ruveyn wrote:
As long as the U.S. is addicted to oil we cannot leave the middle east alone.

The best way for the U.S. to get out of the middle east is to undertake a vast project of generating our electricity by means of nuclear fission. We have enough domestic petroleum to serve as a chemical feed stock for long polymers.

ruveyn


Yes but it won't happen because those with the money to pay the government are making money from oil.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

20 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
World unity? Forget that, I'd rather make it possible for people to leave this world into space than deal with the bloody politics of "unification" which will be nothing but murder of those who don't want "unity".


And then in time, everyone who goes into space with you will find a reason to hate and kill one another. It's human nature, baby!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


I consider war inevitable, but at least in space there is more chance to be free from governments desiring to be ubiquitous nanny states.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,692
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

20 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm

OP: we don't have that clean cut of a global culture anymore. People of different groups with different values are spread to the four figurative corners of the world in every country (except possibly those with immigration policies like Japan's). What that means is that there are no other problems in other countries that can't feel their way right through the wires and hit us. We can fantasize all we want about foreign lands being mystical worlds thousands of miles away, needing standing armies and navies to take on another nation, letters taking six weeks to reach their destinations over that distance, etc. unfortunately the world doesn't work like that anymore thanks to advancements in technology.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

20 Jul 2011, 1:52 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
World unity? Forget that, I'd rather make it possible for people to leave this world into space than deal with the bloody politics of "unification" which will be nothing but murder of those who don't want "unity".


And then in time, everyone who goes into space with you will find a reason to hate and kill one another. It's human nature, baby!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


I consider war inevitable, but at least in space there is more chance to be free from governments desiring to be ubiquitous nanny states.


Actually, if anything, there would be more need for what you refer to as a "nanny state," as from the start, people would probably be more in need of food, medical care, housing, and all the other amenities of life, being that settlers would be starting over from absolutely nothing.
And how does a "nanny state" lead to war, in the first place?

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

20 Jul 2011, 2:05 pm

The Middle East can go rot.



blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

20 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm

It's nice to say that we should invoke the prime directive and allow the middle east to progress at it's own rate, but it turns out that for some reason we care.

I think we could be content to buy all of their oil and allow them to live in mud huts. That's not really the problem.

For some reason we like to believe that we live in a world where it's not ok to sell your daughter into bondage to settle a petty dispute between two families.

Much of the middle east still lives a lifestyle that could easily be called barbaric.

Where if a girl who's been arranged to marry some guy when she was 6 years old grows up to be a teenager who falls for some other guy, and this essentially means that they are condemned to be stoned to death, and if they fail to be stoned to death by accident of getting the heck out of dodge, their families will be endlessly harassed.

Yeah, it's all a rich tapestry of faith and tradition, and they use every part of the buffalo. I shouldn't impose my decadant judeo-christian ideal of live and let live.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

20 Jul 2011, 4:57 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
World unity? Forget that, I'd rather make it possible for people to leave this world into space than deal with the bloody politics of "unification" which will be nothing but murder of those who don't want "unity".


And then in time, everyone who goes into space with you will find a reason to hate and kill one another. It's human nature, baby!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


I consider war inevitable, but at least in space there is more chance to be free from governments desiring to be ubiquitous nanny states.


Fleeing into space is running IN to the arms of Big Brother, not away from him because of the capital intensive nature of the operation including the captital intensive life support needs of the colonists.

However if we exploit space to- say- harvest solar power with sattelites and beam it back to earth then it might create "freedom" for a space colonizing nation on earth from the oil exporting countries also on earth.



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

20 Jul 2011, 5:36 pm

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
A lot of people want the Midle East to be more like the developed world. The neoconservatives want to wage war against the Middle East until it agrees to be like the developed world wheras a lot of people on the far-left want the Middle East to be part of some "world unity".


Both conservative and progressives have a an understanding of what the facts mean. Dropping that understanding does not change the facts. Put simply, we live in an interconnected world. Where our ideas can penetrate into the heart of Iran and suicide bombers can attack our cafes. Threats and ideas travel very fast. All sides understand this and have an idea about where it leads. Yours is perhaps more individualized (you mentioned 1985... thought it is similar to a 'clash of civilizations' mentality, like that put forward by Samuel Huntington. I personally, am a realist. We have an international system, some ideas that exist within the Middle-East are both influential and utterly opposed to this system, as such conflict or change is inevitable. Until certain elements in the Middle-East accept that they are one among many they will remain in conflict with us.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

20 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
And how does a "nanny state" lead to war, in the first place?

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


By the multitude of laws leading to the absence of justice.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

20 Jul 2011, 5:53 pm

blauSamstag wrote:
It's nice to say that we should invoke the prime directive and allow the middle east to progress at it's own rate, but it turns out that for some reason we care.

I think we could be content to buy all of their oil and allow them to live in mud huts. That's not really the problem.

For some reason we like to believe that we live in a world where it's not ok to sell your daughter into bondage to settle a petty dispute between two families.

Much of the middle east still lives a lifestyle that could easily be called barbaric.

Where if a girl who's been arranged to marry some guy when she was 6 years old grows up to be a teenager who falls for some other guy, and this essentially means that they are condemned to be stoned to death, and if they fail to be stoned to death by accident of getting the heck out of dodge, their families will be endlessly harassed.

Yeah, it's all a rich tapestry of faith and tradition, and they use every part of the buffalo. I shouldn't impose my decadant judeo-christian ideal of live and let live.


Quoted for relevance. So many people with their "Coexist" bumper stickers are truly ignorant of the situation out there.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

20 Jul 2011, 5:56 pm

Well considering we have a bunch of them trying to acquire Nuclear missiles, whom their religion dictates we are to be either converted, butchered, or enslaved; I don't think we can afford to simply ignore what is going on in the Middle East. We aren't talking about a group of Buddhist Monks that promote peace, tolerance, and nonviolence.