Master_Pedant wrote:
I still have next to no idea what the hell visagrunt is arguing. Thousands of people were aquainted with Jack Layton, millions more knew about him as a charismatic, public figure. When beloved public figures, nay, NATIONAL figures die, it is customary for many people to attend their funerals and public tributes to their lives. Jack Layton, a beloved national figure, is no different - in fact, his public disclosure of his feelings on cancer probably connected him to Canadians he didn't personally know even more.
Well, no wonder you have next to no idea--you aren't reading what I am saying. I am not arguing anything at all.
I am expressing my own personal sense on disconnection from the
Zeitgeist. Your words like "obsession," and "beloved," lie at the heart of my confusion. I admire Jack Layton, but I have shed no tears at his death. Yet dozens of my friends are making public declarations of shock and grief. I contrast this with the death of Pierre Trudeau in 2000. He, too, I admire greatly. I certainly recall people turning out to pay their respects, but I don't recall an outpouring of grief such as we see today.
I am not suggesting that people's emotions are not genuine--but I am wondering what prompts an emotional response to the death of a public figure.
_________________
--James