JakobVirgil wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
yes, following what was the most partisan year in American politics (2010)
http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine ... n-20110224where democrats had the vote-count to use and abuse, it has further deepened the ideological trenches and the only group on that list whose opinions are worth any observation is the independents.
also the liberal is just identify's with that labeling. they don't like labels period and don't want to be viewed as orthodox, dogmatic, or archaic.
I would even say the independent column(which polling after polling shows they have had a conservative shift of heart) is a reaction to an era of Liberal dominance, first with the Democrat sweeps of 2006, capped with the democratic victory over the white house in 2008.
but liberal dominance should be read as moderate dominance.
yes, for an era, as a reaction to the George Bush Neo-conservative / evangelical era, liberal dominance is due to moderate conservative and moderates(otherwise known as independents) siding with liberals.
That is a fair read of 2004 through 2009.
But it took Democrats coming to center to win them over(as clearly evident in all of the blue-dogs getting elected)... it wasn't a buying into universal health care, high density living, unionization, fast-trains, or carbon-taxes on industry that many Democrats misread then and continue to misread now. Maybe moderate conservative/liberals or the political center don't know well what's best for them, but it is clear that the Democrats case for those issues have not been accepted by them.
_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.