visagrunt wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I doubt the exceeding generality of your statement since, even within your own list of examples, you mention people departing from the American eastern seaboard, and yet there were loads of Americans who remained there because of either lack of finances or due to preference for living in cities or the fear of the unknown or the fear of known difficulties in traveling across vast and barren terrain. Either way, more people stayed in the crowded East than had left for the West.
But those are the ones who are romanticized. What are the American romantic ideals? The Pilgrims, the "Founding Fathers," the Pioneers, the Cowboy. All examples of people seeking to escape.
Are those the only ones? Also, for whom are they ideals of Americans? On shows like Scrapheap challenge I've seen the hosts talk and act as if Americans are like cowboys or somesuch. Not as an insult, but as a real statement as if it were something they seemed to really believe. What of movies like The Godfather or shows like The Fresh Prince Of Bell Air and CSI or JAG? There are idealizations of Americans appearing there too, of gangsters and spoiled wannabe gangsters, of detective scientists and investigators. Those are not people who seek to leave but those who thrive in an urban environment....
visagrunt wrote:
Quote:
But even assuming the veracity of your premise, what is there wrong with desiring to spread out and colonize new lands? That eventually the lands will again be filled and we'll need to move on from there to yet other lands? Is that really so abhorrent to ever bring life and order to locations which are destitute and rudimentary?
I never said it was wrong. It's just an observation.
Ah, I thought you might be trying to make an implied statement instead of merely an observation, sorry.