Shah of Iran & Mike Wallace on the Jewish Lobby - 35 Yrs

Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 

mikecartwright
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 398

15 Dec 2011, 10:00 pm

Shah of Iran & Mike Wallace on the Jewish Lobby - 35 Yrs ago

Uploaded by johnnybanky on Jun 23, 2008

Mike Wallace seemed to be in denial of the bias of the Jewish controlled media in the US towards the Israel's agenda 35 years ago! He became part of it and cut down Ahmadi-Nejad's interview to win the Emmy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kySR3fpa5s

Does anyone here besides me agree with the Shah of Iran ?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

15 Dec 2011, 10:48 pm

I can not agree with a dead man.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2011, 1:26 pm

mikecartwright wrote:
Shah of Iran & Mike Wallace on the Jewish Lobby - 35 Yrs ago

Uploaded by johnnybanky on Jun 23, 2008

Mike Wallace seemed to be in denial of the bias of the Jewish controlled media in the US towards the Israel's agenda 35 years ago! He became part of it and cut down Ahmadi-Nejad's interview to win the Emmy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kySR3fpa5s

Does anyone here besides me agree with the Shah of Iran ?


Jews have a prominent place in the media by virtue of talent but the do not control the media and they never did. William Randolph Hearst controlled more media than did any Jew..

How many networks and newspapers are owned by Jews? Few. Most ownership and managerial control is in the hands of non-Jews.

You are just annoyed that some of the more articulate media types and news types are Jewish. It is talent that annoys you, isn't it?

ruveyn



Telekon
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 411

16 Dec 2011, 8:16 pm

ruveyn wrote:
How many networks and newspapers are owned by Jews? Few. Most ownership and managerial control is in the hands of non-Jews.


Viacom and CBS are owned by Sumner Redstone. The CEO of the Walt Disney Company (which owns ABC and other media subsidiaries) is a Jew. The NYT is owned by the Sulzberger family. The Tribune Company, which publishes the LA Times and the Chicago Tribune, is Jewish-owned. Jews are also major shareholders in US media conglomerates. Carl Icahn owns big stakes in media companies.

Jews do not literally control all of the media, but they control a disproportionate share of it. Anyone in the media who criticizes Jews gets blacklisted. I say this as a Jew myself, with no animus toward other Jews. However, it should be known and acknowledged that Jews have their own particular biases and this is distilled through their many media outlets.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

17 Dec 2011, 4:41 am

mikecartwright wrote:
Shah of Iran & Mike Wallace on the Jewish Lobby - 35 Yrs ago

Uploaded by johnnybanky on Jun 23, 2008

Mike Wallace seemed to be in denial of the bias of the Jewish controlled media in the US towards the Israel's agenda 35 years ago! He became part of it and cut down Ahmadi-Nejad's interview to win the Emmy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kySR3fpa5s

Does anyone here besides me agree with the Shah of Iran ?


Jews do not "control" the media. The news outlets are owned and managed largely by non-Jewish people. In the part of the media that shows namely the t.v. screen and the editorial pages of the newspapers you will see Jewish talent at work. But the decision on what stories to run and how rests largely with the non-Jewish management.

Blaming bad weather on the Jews is really a form of evasion. It is a way of not coming to grips with our problems.

If you really want scape-goats go after those Gentile Bankers who got us into our current state of affairs. Or the U.S. government (regardless of party). The government is run by and for Gentiles.

ruveyn



Telekon
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 411

17 Dec 2011, 10:55 pm

ruveyn wrote:
The government is run by and for Gentiles.

ruveyn


Then why do US politicians running for office kowtow to AIPAC? Why do presidential nominees have to assure the electorate that they support Israel?



cw10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 973

18 Dec 2011, 4:13 am

Telekon wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
The government is run by and for Gentiles.

ruveyn


Then why do US politicians running for office kowtow to AIPAC? Why do presidential nominees have to assure the electorate that they support Israel?


A majority of Christians in the United States support Israel. It would be political suicide not to.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

18 Dec 2011, 8:21 am

cw10 wrote:
Telekon wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
The government is run by and for Gentiles.

ruveyn


Then why do US politicians running for office kowtow to AIPAC? Why do presidential nominees have to assure the electorate that they support Israel?


A majority of Christians in the United States support Israel. It would be political suicide not to.


It is also a consequence of their religious belief. Christ won't came back until the Jews are in the Holy Land.

ruveyn



Telekon
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 411

18 Dec 2011, 7:03 pm

cw10 wrote:
Telekon wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
The government is run by and for Gentiles.

ruveyn


Then why do US politicians running for office kowtow to AIPAC? Why do presidential nominees have to assure the electorate that they support Israel?


A majority of Christians in the United States support Israel. It would be political suicide not to.


Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Presbyterians, Methodists, Calvinists and Lutherans are not concerned with Israel. You're thinking of Dispensationalists, who are not the majority of Christians. Both parties grovel before AIPAC. It can't be for fear of losing the votes of a small Christian sect.