Oodain wrote:
there is the alternative of an actual physical neurology that explains god, the god spot and its related functions.
to me the real problem is the imits of human perception and the insecurity it brings.
even what someone sees aint neccesarily whats actually happened, the brain doesnt really record as a computer does.
I heard of this God gene. It sounds like it would be an easy way to confirm once and for all that there is a god, or whether the theory of a god gene is true or not. Take a religious person with this gene and clone them, but in the process remove that gene. If the clone does not believe in god that may support the existence of god and the theory of the gene. Or clone an atheist and insert that gene and see if they turn out to believe in god.
It would be easy enough to disprove if the results were that the clones turned out to believe in god, and not believe in god respectively.
I have serious doubts about that idea though. I think belief in god is phsycological.