I really do not know why anyone would want to make such a bizarre law. This reminds me of the breast milk issue.
Kjas wrote:
I think you need to consider the difference between something which is Islamic VS. something which is cultural.
Eg. In KSA (Saudi Arabia) women are not allowed to drive. This is a cultural decision, it is not an "Islamic" decision, as is widely touted in western media. In other Islamic countries, women are allowed to drive. There is nothing against it in the Quran, and as such it is not an "Islamic" decision, but a cultural one.
The reason Western media confuses Arab cultural customs with Islam is that Muslims do so as well. Western journalists, not being experts on Islam or the Koran, are only printing what they're told by Muslim clerics, and assuming that they'll know what they're talking about (a very foolish assumption to make).
Many deceived Muslims believe that certain practices are Islamic because that's what their leaders are telling them. In fact most of them are merely cultural. Most Muslim leaders lie to their people and tell them "you must do this, it's what Muslims do" and everyone believes them.
Example: enforcing the hijab is merely cultural. There is NOTHING in the Koran saying that women must cover their hair, yet most Muslims believe that there is, and that the hijab is "Islamic." In fact it is nothing but a cultural Arab custom. All the Koran tells women to do is "draw their veils over their bosoms." It says nothing about hair, yet most practicing Muslims are utterly convinced that it must do, somewhere. It doesn't help matters much that they're only allowed to read the Koran in Arabic. If their native language is not Arabic, then they've never even been able to read the Koran for themselves, to find out whether all the things they're being ordered to do are actually in there or not. Anyway, even if they could read it, questioning it is usually punishable by death in strict countries.