Vigilans wrote:
How about just one referee, picked by the home team, encouraged to keep his intervention minimal?
That'd probably be a corrupt system. The analogy doesn't exactly fit a business situation in any case. So, deregulation keeps enforcement, it just reduces the set of items enforced, and in the process, it cuts jobs no longer needed to enforce things that are no longer enforced. However, it still allows the enforcement of most things.
I mean, I understand that this is an effort at rhetoric, but this is not a cutting analysis, and anybody who thinks it is, is just outright wrong. Most of the people who despise economic deregulation actually LIKE social deregulation, so.... the problem isn't just that it is analogous to something, it's the results.