Fox News -Still Jerks- want wikipedia to be censored.

Page 1 of 10 [ 154 posts ] Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10 Next

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

10 Sep 2012, 7:43 pm

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/09/10/ ... from-site/

Dear Fox News fans: screw you. If you really think the vagina page is erotic then you need to wash up your brains.

_________________
.

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

10 Sep 2012, 7:47 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/09/10/wikipedia-slow-to-filter-graphic-imagery-from-site/

Dear Fox News fans: screw you. If you really think the vagina page is erotic then you need to wash up your brains.

Uh last I checked they were talking about the commons section, not the encylopedia section... Plus they were talking about a filter for those under 18.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,959
Location:

10 Sep 2012, 7:47 pm

Are these the same people that wanted PBS censored because one show featured a segment on self-examination for breast cancer with a fully-clothed model?

Are these the same people that want abstinence-only sex education taught in public schools?

Are these the same people that want to segregate boys and girls until they reach the age of majority?

Faux News, go chase yourself!

_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.

Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

10 Sep 2012, 7:51 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Vexcalibur wrote:

Uh last I checked they were talking about the commons section, not the encylopedia section... Plus they were talking about a filter for those under 18.

Cause if minors see a boob Space Hitler may be spawned from a satanic pentagram and force us all to vote Obama.

How exactly is the filter going to work only for those under 18? Do you want wikipedia commons to commit suicide by including a request for the user's age just in case he might be a child looking for porn? Or do you want it to filter by default? (This would be exactly the same as censoring for all).

And no, they are not talking about commons only. They are talking about the whole encyclopedia, and using stats about Commons to justify it.

_________________
.

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

10 Sep 2012, 7:53 pm

Fnord wrote:

Your first and third claim you need to back up with sources....

The 2nd one actually makes sense, if kids weren't trying to have sex in the first place we wouldn't see a huge increase in under-age girls being pregnent.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,959
Location:

10 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Your first and third claim you need to back up with sources...

What claims? I'm asking questions, not making claims! Well ... except for telling them to go chase themselves.

Inuyasha wrote:

The 2nd one actually makes sense, if kids weren't trying to have sex in the first place we wouldn't see a huge increase in under-age girls being pregnant.

If they understood and used contraception, then fewer under-aged girls would become pregnant.

aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,359

10 Sep 2012, 8:02 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Your second claim is incorrect per the most recent statistics on teen pregnancies as they continue to decrease. And, that continued decrease in teen pregnancies is not attributed to abstinence education.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_126474.html

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

10 Sep 2012, 8:05 pm

Fnord wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Your first and third claim you need to back up with sources...

What claims? I'm asking questions, not making claims! Well ... except for telling them to go chase themselves.

You are claiming that they want to segregate children by gender, and I don't recall Fox News ever advocating that. Then you are claiming they went after PBS for something that they didn't. They went after PBS for using taxpayer money for political purposes, another phony narative that Democrats (the one that they used last time) was that Republicans wanted to get rid of Sesame Street (when the reality was PBS was using taxpayer money for partisan purposes).

Fnord wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

The 2nd one actually makes sense, if kids weren't trying to have sex in the first place we wouldn't see a huge increase in under-age girls being pregnant.

If they understood and used contraception, then fewer under-aged girls would become pregnant.

Actually, that only reduces the risk, but there is still a chance of pregnency. The only way to guarentee no pregnency occurring is to wait until you're actually an adult.

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Sep 2012, 8:11 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

The 2nd one actually makes sense, if kids weren't trying to have sex in the first place we wouldn't see a huge increase in under-age girls being pregnant.

If they understood and used contraception, then fewer under-aged girls would become pregnant.

Actually, that only reduces the risk, but there is still a chance of pregnency. The only way to guarentee no pregnency occurring is to wait until you're actually an adult.

What is the risk of learning how to spell?

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,959
Location:

10 Sep 2012, 8:14 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

QUESTIONS! I am asking QUESTIONS!

This reminds me of when I asked questions in Sunday School, and the teacher would tell me that I was an atheist for asking them.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

10 Sep 2012, 8:21 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Actually, that only reduces the risk, but there is still a chance of pregnency. The only way to guarentee no pregnency occurring is to wait until you're actually an adult.

That's a great point, adult women can't get pregnant when they are married unless they invite the soul of Jesus into their body, otherwise they will give birth to a sinful decadent atheist baby

_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do

blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

10 Sep 2012, 8:28 pm

Vigilans wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

Actually, that only reduces the risk, but there is still a chance of pregnency. The only way to guarentee no pregnency occurring is to wait until you're actually an adult.

That's a great point, adult women can't get pregnant when they are married unless they invite the soul of Jesus into their body, otherwise they will give birth to a sinful decadent atheist baby

The only way to guarantee no pregnancy is to censor wikipedia and all the interwebs. After all, the forbidden knowledge of good and evil is in there.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

10 Sep 2012, 8:32 pm

blunnet wrote:

Vigilans wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

Actually, that only reduces the risk, but there is still a chance of pregnency. The only way to guarentee no pregnency occurring is to wait until you're actually an adult.

That's a great point, adult women can't get pregnant when they are married unless they invite the soul of Jesus into their body, otherwise they will give birth to a sinful decadent atheist baby

The only way to guarantee no pregnancy is to censor wikipedia and all the interwebs., After all, the forbidden knowledge of good and evil is in there.

I think chastity belts that grow with the child might be a good idea, besides being a practical return investment since the parent won't have to keep buying new chastity belts

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

10 Sep 2012, 8:41 pm

Fnord wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

QUESTIONS! I am asking QUESTIONS!

This reminds me of when I asked questions in Sunday School, and the teacher would tell me that I was an atheist for asking them.

Your "questions" as you call them are using phony assertions... I'm merely pointing out that some "facts" in your questions are in error. Not my problem you're giving inaccurate information.

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Actually, that only reduces the risk, but there is still a chance of pregnency. The only way to guarentee no pregnency occurring is to wait until you're actually an adult.

So, adults don't get pregnant? That's a relief. Or, is "pregnent" something else entirely?

Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

10 Sep 2012, 9:01 pm

The adult body has mechanisms against unwanted pregnancy

_________________
.

Page 1 of 10 [ 154 posts ] Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10 Next

Jump to:

Fox News -Still Jerks- want wikipedia to be censored. Post Reply New Topic

Fox News -Still Jerks- want wikipedia to be censored.