puddingmouse wrote:
^Ethics falls apart when people are hypocrites, imo.
I partially agree, say if a wealthy person advocates charitable acts and begins a charity to give to the less well off, that they then violate by hoarding all of his cash and spending it only on himself, does that mean we loose belief in the institution of charitable giving? Or do we maintain the ideal, keep people accountable?
The issue with the closet Gay against Gay marriage is more difficult since there are people who do not hold the male/female ideal. But Im sure you hold that the partner who cheats is unethical as a general ideal, and even if partners do cheat, in business, in a relationship, that does not disparage us from believing that partners shouldn't cheat, or that the ideal should be lowered for the fact that people cannot meet it.
I don't think the case here is simply hypocrisy at all, hypocrisy on its own is not enough for one to question upholding certain ethical positions. It is a specific kind of hypocrisy ment to question validity of certain principles that
others hold that you don't agree with. If something is believed by everyone, then even if people deviate from it, as they are likely to do, we still uphold it as the standard that we are to still live up to. Doing what is right is only in question, and subject to judgments of hypocrisy that question its validity, if we don't agree at the onset of whether something is moral or immoral.
_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.