Page 1 of 2 [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

AJ89
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Location: Canada

25 Nov 2012, 2:59 pm

I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?



Seabass
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 199

25 Nov 2012, 3:17 pm

I suppose, but it sure as hell sounds more moral.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

SpiritBlooms
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,024

25 Nov 2012, 3:34 pm

AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?

Yes, but I prefer what many near-death-experiencers (NDEs) have reported, that the only judgment that takes place is that of the deceased judging themselves after a life review.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

25 Nov 2012, 4:17 pm

AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?


It sounds like nonsense to me.

ruveyn



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

25 Nov 2012, 4:20 pm

ruveyn wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?


It sounds like nonsense to me.

ruveyn

It sounds a lot more desirable than me, and plausible from a philosophical stance.

Eternal torture without hope of end or respite sounds like the will of a masochist, rather than a benevolent god worthy of worship much less one I would want to spend eternity with.



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

25 Nov 2012, 4:21 pm

SpiritBlooms wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?

Yes, but I prefer what many near-death-experiencers (NDEs) have reported, that the only judgment that takes place is that of the deceased judging themselves after a life review.


have you ever noticed that people who have NDE's never seem to bring back accounts of 'hell'?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

25 Nov 2012, 4:21 pm

thomas81 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?


It sounds like nonsense to me.

ruveyn

It sounds a lot more desirable than me, and plausible from a philosophical stance.

Eternal torture without hope of end or respite sounds like the will of a masochist, rather than a benevolent god worthy of worship much less one I would want to spend eternity with.


There is not an iota of empirical evidence indicating humans have a life after their physical death.

Such is wishful thinking.

ruveyn



SpiritBlooms
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,024

25 Nov 2012, 4:26 pm

thomas81 wrote:
SpiritBlooms wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?

Yes, but I prefer what many near-death-experiencers (NDEs) have reported, that the only judgment that takes place is that of the deceased judging themselves after a life review.


have you ever noticed that people who have NDE's never seem to bring back accounts of 'hell'?
Yes, which leads me to believe perhaps there is none. I think we create our own heaven or hell - on earth or later - if there is a later.



bigwheel
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2012
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 239

25 Nov 2012, 4:32 pm

Yessir..as my old TV Pal Brother EV Hill say one time. "You cant check into Hell for the weekend just to see if you like it." The Good Book says the fire is not quenched and the worm never dieth..paraphrasing of course. Choose wisely. Weigh the possible consequences of your decisions. Thanks.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

25 Nov 2012, 4:49 pm

thomas81 wrote:
SpiritBlooms wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Universal reconciliation was believed in by the majority of Christians during the period of early Christianity.

Doesn't this sound more plausible than an eternal hell?

Yes, but I prefer what many near-death-experiencers (NDEs) have reported, that the only judgment that takes place is that of the deceased judging themselves after a life review.


have you ever noticed that people who have NDE's never seem to bring back accounts of 'hell'?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRSjzY0s0SM

Also, the theology generally isn't that God is damning people, but that God has to actively save people, and he can't do that if they have not asked to be saved. Everyone needs to be saved because some people who never existed ate a fruit that they weren't allowed to eat. Of course, that also makes very little sense.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

25 Nov 2012, 4:52 pm

How can it be Heaven when most of the people are not like the rest?

Uniformity! Conformity! Cookie-cutter souls playing and singing the same songs over and over forever and ever, Hallelujah!! ! THAT is Heaven!

;)



nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

25 Nov 2012, 4:56 pm

There was an entire American denomination based upon the theology of universal reconciliation (the Universalist Church). It later joined with the Unitarian Church to form the Unitarian Universalist Association.


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute


bigwheel
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2012
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 239

25 Nov 2012, 5:56 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
SpiritBlooms wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Also, the theology generally isn't that God is damning people, but that God has to actively save people, and he can't do that if they have not asked to be saved. Everyone needs to be saved because some people who never existed ate a fruit that they weren't allowed to eat. Of course, that also makes very little sense.


The theology of Bible Believing Christians runs something like this. We are all damned extending back to the failure in Eden and to our own propensity to fail to properly observe God's Written Ordinances. So he sends us a Life Preserver in the form of Jesus Christ. For them who are smart enough to grab hold of Jesus they will be moved from enemies of God to being Beloved Children and younger siblings of Christ. It's indescribably delicious..to coin a phrase..lol.



Seabass
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 199

25 Nov 2012, 6:10 pm

bigwheel wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
SpiritBlooms wrote:
AJ89 wrote:
I'm an atheist but I find universal reconciliation to be interesting. It means that all people will eventually go to heaven regardless of whether or not they believed in Jesus Christ. Sinners will go to hell but not for eternity.

Also, the theology generally isn't that God is damning people, but that God has to actively save people, and he can't do that if they have not asked to be saved. Everyone needs to be saved because some people who never existed ate a fruit that they weren't allowed to eat. Of course, that also makes very little sense.


The theology of Bible Believing Christians runs something like this. We are all damned extending back to the failure in Eden and to our own propensity to fail to properly observe God's Written Ordinances. So he sends us a Life Preserver in the form of Jesus Christ. For them who are smart enough to grab hold of Jesus they will be moved from enemies of God to being Beloved Children and younger siblings of Christ. It's indescribably delicious..to coin a phrase..lol.


Smart enough? Are you condescending enough?



1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

25 Nov 2012, 6:52 pm

Well, the general Orthodox viewpoint is we should hope and pray for Universal Reconciliation. However, it's not guaranteed. We simply do not know how God will judge everyone. God is within his power and rights to send everyone to hell if he wants to, that's a given. But, since we do believe God is a merciful God, it's likely he'll have some amount of mercy on nonbelievers. People who willfully don't believe will probably be treated differently than people with no opportunity to know (ie, people in a remote jungle type thing.) In Orthodox Christianity, we pray for the souls of the departed, that God will have mercy on them. What God decides, we don't know.

This is an interesting argument about who is "saved" though.

Quote:

The Jesuits' pragmatic accommodation with Confucianism was later to lead to conflict with the Dominican friars, who came to Beijing from the Philippines in the middle of the century. Dominican leader Domingo Fernández Navarrete in responding to the question, 'Was Confucious saved?' said that since Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Seneca and others were all damned "how much the more Confucius, who was not worthy to kiss their feet"? In responding, António de Gouveia, a Portuguese Jesuit, said that Confucius was certainly saved, "which is more than can be said for King Philip IV of Spain."[3]


Even in the Bible Jesus says this:
Quote:

47 “The servant who knows the master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what the master wants will be beaten with many blows. 48 But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked.


I interpret that as meaning that people who do not know will not be judged as severely as people who do know and reject Jesus's teachings.

So I'd like to lean toward Universal Reconciliation, but I can't speak on behalf of God on what exactly he's going to do one way or the other. One thing interesting, Origen's theory of UR only got rejected by the Church after he said the demons and possibly Satan himself would be reconciled again, but there wasn't really controversy over it applying to humans.