Prison labour taking private sector jobs
This is odd:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/09/16/am ... ent-lines/
Not only is Fox Noise reporting on it, but is taking a decidedly liberal perspective.
Here is Unicor's website: http://www.unicor.gov/
Convict labour is doing a whole host of things. It would appear that US convicts are doing not only work that was previously done in the US private sector, but US convicts are also taking jobs that were previously exported to India and Bangladesh: including call center operations.
It is quite amazing what prisoners are producing these days: everything from eyeware to solar panels.
According to Unicor's website: http://www.unicor.gov/about/faqs/top_ten/index.cfm
STABILITY: 75 years of experience! A corporation that has stood the test of time, and one that you can count on to be there for you in the future. We stand behind everything we sell.
MADE IN AMERICA: Quality, Made in the USA products and services, supporting domestic jobs and our Nation’s economy.
I'm somehow reminded of the movie Schindler's List. Polish-made products, under German management, with Jewish slave labour.
In our case: we have a similarly huge prison population, but that is mostly Black. I'm guessing that most of the call center jobs are reserved for White inmates.
Okay, here is why Fox takes such a liberal stand against Unicor
http://www.bop.gov/inmate_programs/unicor.jsp
By statute, FPI is restricted to selling its products to the Federal Government. Its principal customer is the Department of Defense, from which FPI derives approximately 53 percent of its sales. Other key customers include the Department of Homeland Security, the General Services Administration, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Social Security Administration, Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Department of Transportation, Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Unicor is owned by the Government, was created during the New Deal days, and competes against defense contractors.
If they had the opportunity to learn skills that would help them on release to acquire good paying jobs it could be a good thing.My neighbor is in the big house right now and he does back-hoe work there.He says it beats sitting in his cell.If people would take a chance and hire ex-cons after release we probably wouldn't see the rate of repeat offenses,it's sad that you can do one stupid thing and be judged the rest of your life.
Put them to work, so that their lives are not totally wasted.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
I have absolutely no issue with prison labour, per se.
However, I take a great deal of exception to exploitative prison labour. A basic proposition should be that prisoners earn a living wage for the work that they do. From that living wage, they can then pay a reasonable cost for their food, clothing and shelter. Prison labour can be incentivized by allowing prisoners to use money accumulated from their employment towards enhanced goods and services.
But when prison labour is used to produce inexpensive goods and services that unfairly compete with goods and services created in the marketplace, that's when I begin to view it as distortive.
_________________
--James
Prison labor wouldn't be so totally abhorrent if the majority of inmates weren't locked up on BS politically legislated charges and the savings were actually passed onto the taxpayers who pay an exuberant price to lock them up instead of private interests. I have no reference for this but I'm almost sure that it's true, that we spend more per-inmate than we do per-student.
It plays into the whole prison-industrial complex, when it's profitable to certain private interests what do you think they're going to lobby for?
The prisons most of the times in small towns or rural areas, there whole way of life depends on them a lot of the time. What do you think those people are going to vote for?
Adjective:
1. Filled with or characterized by a lively energy and excitement.
2. Growing luxuriantly or profusely: "exuberant foliage".
I believe "exorbitant" was the intended word...
Merriam-Webster has it defined differently
Definition of EXUBERANT
1
: extreme or excessive in degree, size, or extent <exuberant prosperity>
2
a : joyously unrestrained and enthusiastic <exuberant praise> <an exuberant personality>
b : unrestrained or elaborate especially in style : flamboyant <exuberant architecture>
3
: produced in extreme abundance : plentiful <exuberant foliage and vegetation>
It could still be the used under the definition you given since the cost to the taxpayer is growing progressively more burdensome or exorbitant could be used as well.
Not sure what the point is of derailing your own thread tho.
It plays into the whole prison-industrial complex, when it's profitable to certain private interests what do you think they're going to lobby for?
The prisons most of the times in small towns or rural areas, there whole way of life depends on them a lot of the time. What do you think those people are going to vote for?
I couldn't agree more.
The purpose of prison is to remove certain people from society and not to provide cheap labor for corporations! And yet, prisoners really need to be kept busy and if there is a way to put inmates to work doing something productive while at the same time lowering the cost of prisons they I say prison labor is a great idea. However, if companies are using it just to increase their profits and are depriving people of jobs who really need them to pay the bills(and prisoners are NOT in that category since they are fed, clothed, and housed by the government) then I say it's time to put a stop to it
Most of those jobs don't exist on the outside and why should they when they can be done by those on the inside for profits larger than ever.
Profits off prison labour encourage more imprisonment. The corporate people make good money off prison labour, lobby the government to increase prison time and find ways to get more people in prison, and so more people end up being imprisoned. This happened by the way in the South during the Jim Crow era. It's happening again. A sort of a Gulag.
The only problem I see with this is the possibility of bad incentives on government, which other people have pointed out. It may be worth opposing on those grounds.
Beyond that, there is little problem that I can see. We don't want prisons to be hellish, but at the same time, I doubt that this will make prison more hellish, so long as it isn't turned into a 16 hour a day sweatshop, particularly given that one of the biggest problems with prisons is other prisoners. By taking up their time, I wouldn't be surprised if we're also reducing this possible harm. I could be wrong though, and research would be interesting on this issue.
I'm unsure how prison labor is really significantly different than Mexico or China though in the economic terms of it. If one does not object to foreign trade with poorer nations, then one has little grounds to object to prison labor on economic reasons. There may be a human rights issue, but even then given that this is a prison system, the biggest human rights concern is not involving cruelty in the punishment.
There was a Judge in Pennsylvania I believe who basically convicted every youth that came in front of him of some BBS charge (Trial by judge) and sent him to this 'reform' facility....which was ran by one of his friends who paid him for it. Yeah totally unbiased.
Remember in stalinist USSR there were arrest quotas so people could be sent to the GULAG to make stuff or do public works projects.....a bit like modern day (and historical) USA, only with more racism involved ![]()
_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 34248.html
Now that cheap illegal migrant labourers are becoming scarce, farms are turning to convict labour at harvest time.
It was either that, or raise wages to the point where free legal residents would be willing to accept the work.
