visagrunt wrote:
I have little sympathy.
My point is that if this was a problem then it should have been dealt with when originally discovered back in 2007, probably with a warning.
Bringing a minor matter like this up more than five years later strikes me as a case where someone has a grudge against him.
It strikes me as being against natural justice to be pulled up for a very minor infraction years later.
The point is that he wasn't surfing for porn on his laptop. He was watching a DVD. Once the DVD had been removed, there would have been no record of what was playing on the laptop (if the disc wasn't unfortunate enough to be discovered). It wouldn't be the same if he was surfing the Internet for porn.