Most post-911 high profile U.S. terrorism plots fake

Post Reply New Topic

Since September 11 2001, the United States has experienced at times sensational tales of horrible terrorism plots thwarted at the last moment by the ever-vigilant FBI. In truth, however, the only plot to terrorise the public was hatched by the FBI itself, inventing these productions for the purpose of terrorising the public and notching victories in the War of Terror.

Always they would troll for the most vulnerable and angry people and they send usually a convicted criminal, usually a con man and in one case, a rapist, to pester the target incessantly so that he would eventually agree to play a role in the FBI plot. The FBI's so-called informer usually would pay the target money or in other ways create a dependence so that the target could not possibly refuse his commands. The production would end with the so-called attack where the target would press a button that would blow something up only to have G-men nab him.

Though these are clearly entrapment cases, the FBI has a perfect record in convicting the targets. This is because of many things; jury selection gets rid of all those who disapprove of these FBI tactics. The FBI informer always refuses to record the most important conversations that can be used to prove that this was entrapment, claiming a "recording device malfunction", and the juries have lapped this explanation up every time. There's the suggestion that juries don't care if it's entrapment, that the target pressed a button believing he was about to kill people is said to be enough to make them want to convict. That these people had no means to harm anyone without the FBI is said to be irrelevent.

Some will say that it's the fault of the targets for not resisting adequately, and the suggestion here is that those who resist should be rewarded for showing their loyalty to their country. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The FBI gets very angry when a target fails to perform his assigned duties. The case of Khalifah Al-Akili comes to mind.

After being pestered by a man who had entrapped people in two separate cases, he looked him up and found out what was going on. He sent emails to media about it and threatened to sue the FBI. The next day, before a press conference he had arranged could happen, he was arrested by the FBI for an event that happened two years earlier.

Mr. Al-Akili had been convicted of a crime years before and was not allowed to own a gun. In 2010 he went to a gun firing range with a friend and fired his friend's gun there. Thanks to the FBI informer, footage of him at the gun range was stolen by the FBI, and the informer's chats with him encouraging him to be involved with terrorism were sufficient that Al-Akili was accused of pro-terrorist sympathies when he was arrested and that this was used to deny him bail.

He was then forced to plead guilty and will be sentenced to between 10 to 15 years in prison. That's what he gets for daring to expose the FBI's little scam. Notice how the article announcing his guilty plea leaves out the details about the attempt to entrap him.

The FBI clearly wants to keep terrorising the public with these fake plots. The FBI not only targets Muslims but also went after Occupy, having snatched a group of people last May Day in another FBI production. Meanwhile, juries continue to reward the FBI for its terrorism. The FBI is a menace to the American people.

Usually the FBI only targets really stupid people, like the Occupy "terrorists" in Ohio who were all strung out on dope, and when the stupid people catch on they're encouraged to continue. Unfortunately, only stupid people are picked for the juries, but that probably doesn't matter since it's legal for judges to force a jury into a certain verdict via jury instructions. There have been drug cases where the jury says "this guy is clearly innocent, what happens if we let him go" and the judge says well then I'll hold you all in contempt of court for not following the jury instructions and jail you all. Then the jury finds the guy guilty. We might as well just junk the whole thing about juries and let professional judges decide cases then, the govt will get a 100% conviction rate and be happy.

In one case I know happened to a friend of mine who was called for a jury, one guy in the pool says "I don't believe anything pigs say" (cops were the chief "witnesses") and the judge calls the guy into chambers, followed by the bailiff. Next thing everybody knows, several cops rush in and drag the poor guy off to jail, and he's saying "I didn't do anything, what did I do?" and the cops give him a swift kick to the head and he goes limp, and then is carted away. Suffice it to say that NOBODY questioned the cops after that.

If you can be hauled to jail simply for questioning the govt's case when you haven't even been picked for the jury yet, can you imagine that nobody wants to be the guy who says the "terrorist" is innocent? It's really the ultimate catch-22, if you do what they want they send you to jail, if you don't they send you to jail anyway. The FBI always gets its man. With nobody being found not guilty under threat of the jury being imprisoned, the govt can't lose.

There was a case in New York City where it was in this case the NYPD but not the FBI that did this, they took a mentally ill person and offered him weapons for very cheap to use in a terrorist attack. The target had this idea of taking these cheap weapons and reselling them at their street value and making a lot of money. He was forced to plead guilty and was sentenced to a long prison term for terrorism. By the way, anyone notice that bombs are now known as "Weapons of Mass Destruction"? That's what they say when they arrest people during these theatrical productions.

Strangely, the only people I see bringing this case up are the usual cheerleaders for Hamas terrorists, jihadist websites, oh, and the far-left MotherJones and - who else - The Guardian. The sort of lunatics that see 'Islamophobia' round every corner, and have about the same amount of self-awareness as a tea cosy.

I'm not going to lose sleep over a fuzzy-face. I need more information on this case from sources without vested interests.

Reason.com - Free minds and free markets...
Yes, the extreme leftists strike again.

Manufacturing Terrorists

This is 100% true. The FBI has it's fingers in almost every "foiled" terrorist plot. Remember the Hutaree? Completely FBI made up. It's not much of a leap to make assumptions about Oklahoma City and 9/11. Just look at what the government did at Waco, you don't think they're capable of more?

So many are fooled by this image of the suspects pressing some button thinking that they're going to blow people up and say they are dangerous. People who have "evil thoughts" are of no danger without capabilities. In a real terrorist plot they'd be superfluous. I mean, why have some kid press a button when all the heavy lifting, the purchase of materials, the use of contacts, the assembly of the bomb or what have you, all this stuff is the heart of a plot and these people can't do it, the FBI has to do it for them. It's that part that's a danger, not the evil thoughts of a disconnected powerless person. People are really being convicted for thinking at a moment that they really were blowing people up... it's a thoughtcrime.