"Wage Slave" = Someone who believes that he or she should be paid more for doing less, but who does not have what it takes to successfully compete for a position that will actually pay more for less work (Syn.: "Goldbricker", Sandbagger", "Slacker", "Whiner", et cetera.)
Venger wrote:
I think it's ridiculous how the workplace usually has a military type command structure even if it's a crappy fast food job or something. Also, employers usually view the people they hire in extreme-terms meaning if they're not a completely perfect employee then they're a terrible one in the employer's eyes.
Fast-food places are more regimented than your average R&D department - they have to be. Many fast-food workers (according to my friends at the Rotary) seem to have just barely enough discipline to show up for their scheduled shifts, so it only seems reasonable to be more strictly regimented in a fast-food environment that in an engineering environment. Some engineers show up two or three hours after everyone else, and go home two or three hours late, as well. The programmers' schedules are more erratic - as long as they put in their 40 hours each week, they get paid for 40 hours.
Venger wrote:
Job interviews are another example of this how you usually have to dress, talk, and act totally perfect during them.

Look at it this way: There are a
lot of people who are both able and willing to dress, talk, and act totally perfect during an interview, and many of these people are also perfectly qualified for the job. I interview a lot of applicants. Given the choice between one of these "perfect" people and someone who bumbles, fumbles, mumbles, and stumbles his or her way through an interview while wearing clothes that are inappropriate even for public display, I am going to hire the more "perfect" person.
It's called "Competing for the Job", and if you can't compete, then you may as well just stay home and whine about how "Life is soooooo unfair!"
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Last edited by Fnord on 25 Feb 2013, 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.