Its pretty easy to separate them. As example you can take the speech of president bush, when starting the afghanistan war, when he talked about going to war to protect the christian tradition. So he was talking as if he really was interested in christian tradition, when in fact Jesus never would have gone to any war. Which means while Bush talked about appreciating christian traditions, what he was doing was raping and gangbanging Jesus really hard from behind.
Or typical kind of radical, fanatic and violent fanatic members of a religion that is about respect and forgiving. ^^ So to feel better, they tell themself to believe in the right thing, while when it comes to action to proof their believings they are not doing so.
So from my oppinion its more about the "right practice" because only by doing so, you proof what you are really believing in. Everything else is only a proof of someone being able to move his lips. But I generally disagree the part with the "endorsed by those in authority". So according to authorities it is ok to let children work as slaves for Nestle and other companies, to deliver us with cheap chocolate. So from my oppinion I dont care for the authorities and simply dont buy no none Fairtrade chocolate.