adb wrote:
Yes. It would also be grand if science was treated scientifically instead of religiously. His brand of atheism is opposing theism, not just rejecting it.
I respect science, but not always the "scientist". Likewise, I respect atheism, but not always the "atheist".
And why is that an issue, I oppose pedophilia, murder, rape, theft, poverty, etc. To just reject them is to ignore the harm they do to others, I wholeheartedly oppose religion so cannot be accused of my acceptance of scientific facts as a religious ideology.
I respect evidence and I disrespect faith based falsehoods.