pawelk1986 wrote:
Jesus Christ said that we should turn the other cheek if someone hurt us, but does this really work?
First ask when Jesus was present on the earth and who His audience was when He spoke.
He was teaching in what we call the first century to predominantly Jewish crowds. At this point in time the Jews were at the mercy of their Roman captors. The prevailing view of Messiah at this time was that Messiah would be a mighty king, a military leader, and a unifying element for the Hebrew nation. They were looking for everything that Jesus wasn't. Jesus wasn't even the first to take a popular unifying role. There were other potential messianic figures who had inspired popular uprisings against the Romans both before and after Jesus, and they all failed. The Romans were never that combative with Jesus and His followers, nor had they any reason to be. They were all a non-threat. It was the Pharisee class that felt a political threat as well as a threat to religious authority.
Jesus' audience covered a wide swath of Jewish society, many of whom probably expected Jesus to lead a rebellion. Look at the Biblical record--He feeds 5,000 men at a time on a couple of fish and a loaf of bread. Shortly after that He feeds 4,000. I mean, He's losing numbers here, and not long after that He starts teaching some seriously unattractive stuff that drives many more followers away. What He had left was a pretty solid core of followers, but His teachings were purposefully non-threatening.
And here is what I'm getting at: Because of the social, religious, and political conditions in effect at the time, it was easy for Jews to be revenge-oriented towards the Romans. For the sake of keeping the peace and winning converts among the Romans in the future, Jesus was saying, "When someone strikes you on one cheek," He was talking in terms that those people understood. And in this case He meant specifically the Romans. You can reword it as "When a Roman soldier strikes you on one cheek, turn and let him strike the other side, too." Going the extra mile means the same thing. It means being taken by force, i.e. against your will. When a Roman soldier takes you by force to carry his stuff one mile, stay with him another mile.
This is all important because it shows a kind spirit that Roman soldiers are not taught to expect. Going the extra mile not only shows kindness, but it helps open a dialog in which the oppressed person can share the gospel with an unbeliever in a non-threatening kind of way. It's a behavioral pattern that completely disarms the enemy and opens the door to evangelism. First, get around the beam of a vengeful spirit that is blocking your view to understanding your enemy. Disarm your enemy by showing unexpected kindness. And finally, make your enemy your brother by winning a convert. There's no guarantee that you'll win a convert the first time out, but at worst all you did was plant a seed.
Jesus was all about staying on task to spread His message. It never had anything to do with "Oh, look how great I am!! ! Somebody slapped me once, so I turned around to let them do it twice." It was always about doing whatever it took to win souls.
Besides, Jesus didn't teach any kind of strict, non-violent approach. One important value that Jesus promoted was the noble idea of putting yourself in harm's way to help your friends. Jesus even at times advised that it might be best to carry weapons for personal protection. Peace is always preferred in the gospels. It is not, however, assured. There is a time for everything under the sun--a time to endure oppression, and a time to rescue the oppressed. While Jesus did say to endure violent treatment at the hands of an oppressor, He never advised people against intervening on behalf of victims, with the sole exception of His own arrest at Gethsemane. We have to be very careful in how we interpret passages like "turn the other cheek," because I really don't think this makes a good case for pacifism.