50 Reasons why god is Imaginary

Post Reply New Topic

http://godisimaginary.com/ On this website click each link and read from 1 to 50 and you'll see why.

The sites doesn't really disprove anything. I beats around the bush and puts up false dilemmas, pretty much.

Simple solution. Use science to enhance imagination.

These are really bad... Some disprove Christianity to an extent, but as to actually disproving the existence of a god they're largely irrelevant or require irrational jumps in logic.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS323LCP2QI[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKNd_S3iXfs[/youtube]

Looked at the first one, saw how incredibly stupid it is, I'm done.

Which god is imaginary? Zeus, Yaweh, Allah, Vishnu and six billion other Hindu deities?

Not a single human (including me) have ever got the Real God (or Gods) down right. All we have are these cartoons cooked up by leaders of various religions in order to advance their own agendas.

ruveyn

Well, I read an considerable amount of them. Somewhere above 20, actually. (I know, a Christian that actually looked at arguments in the atheist's favor. Shocking, right?)

Well, the Rapture argument doesn't work when one does not believe in the ''Secret Rapture.''

The ''sell all you have'' part stems from the fact the man held wealth higher than the Lord. (A equivalent to that would you being told to stop watching anime, reading manga, playing video games. Whatever your otaku side comes from. You of course would brush the demand aside.)

If Jesus WAS to reappear in front of someone, the Bible basically contradicted itself as it said Jesus would only return when the Last Hurrah is over. Nevertheless him touching the ground.

I cannot remember the rest of the links off hand... Though, I do wonder why they made the theologian call the atheist an idiot. Kind of paints a negative image on Christians that if they don't agree with us, we despise them. (No, lukewarm Christians don't count.)

As ever, these atheist things pull a fast one logically. They go only for the form of easily shredded religion that their audience is most familiar with, then they claim to have disproved all religion. It shows this is targeted to hook less thinking folks, not aspies in fact, much like Evangelical tracts are targetesd the same. At least I'll grasnt it's good that the Evangelical tracts have competitor.

These points very well disprove the omnipotent God of the most conservative literalist versions of Christianity, and in doing only that I agree with them. They don't at all disprove, or even rock, the common sense non-omnipotent Universal Spirit who many freer thinking folks with minds open to spirituallity experience.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMUDXO4xkW8[/youtube]

Those only talk about "god" in a biblical context.
Yeah, the biblical version of "god" may be imaginary. That book was written to obscure truth and subjugate the masses.
But what about a pantheistic, or panentheistic concept of "god", matter & energy being a result of pure universal consciousness itself.
I don't really like the word "god" anyhow, it's got too much baggage, it's more of a name that implies an anthropomorphic deity.

Isn't it more foolish to assume that the universe is not unique when we do not have any evidence to the contrary? The universe originally meant everything. If there are multiple universes, this just begs the question of how the so-called multiverse came into existence. Your video makes another false dilemma, and uses the size of the universe as a proof that there is no god.

1. supernatural interference is in no way a necessity to explain the origin of the universe, or indeed the diversity of life on this small suburb of this galaxy, we have sufficient scientific understanding to know that these things can occur naturally.
2. The universe is overwhelmingly hostile to life and has been, from its inception, utterly chaotic. Doesn't support the design hypothesis, also considering that life is sparsely scattered across the cosmos at best.
3. No one has ever been able to back up supernatural claims under laboratory conditions.
4. God/(s) of the various religions of the world are suspiciously anthropomorphic and concerned with human affairs for transcendental beings.
5. The supposed wisdom imparted to the prophets of religions by said gods is largely demonstrably false- it's fairly plain the world isn't carried on the back of a celestial turtle, noah and co. would've died of oxygen starvation, creationism in its most literally interpreted form is plainly BS.
6. The first clause argument makes little sense- it starts by asserting deterministically that everything must be caused by something else, and that there must therefore be a first, uncaused cause- but the conclusion violates the very premise of the argument.


There are 6 decent objections, but atheists have no right to be smug- just because you don't believe in a deity, doesn't mean you can't still be an idiot, or indeed superstitious.

first *cause* argument, that should read.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9izVu_TtAE[/youtube]