naturalplastic wrote:
Makes you wonder if some members of the US Congress didnt purposely prolong Prohibition because they were involved in bootlegging on the side!
Or if some legilstators today are resisting legalizing pot because they traffic in it illegally and would loose money if it were legalized.
It's not quite that direct, but the actual dynamic is quite similar. Take pot. Who benefits from keeping pot illegal? The DEA spends billions of dollars every year on "cannabis suppression", money that pays for officers and equipment and someone's little bureaucratic empire, to say nothing of what trickles down to local police departments in the form of federal grants, and every person who benefits from that money now has a reason to want pot to stay illegal lest the money tap get shut off. That would include police unions, who are major players in politics, and private prisons and their lobbyists and guards and
their unions, which are sometimes even more powerful than the police ones. So, what you have is a situation where no one in the government actually has to be dealing pot on the side in order to benefit from it's continued illegality, all they have to do is support that status quo and receive money and political support from the various constituencies who directly or indirectly profit from enforcing the stupid pot laws. It's pretty sick, a whole economy based on locking people up for jobs and favors. Now apply that same dynamic to other federal laws and regulations, and you'll start to see the true scope of the problem.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez