Is feminism running rampant on university campuses?

Post Reply New Topic

Well? on the grounds that women are human beings and deserve equal pay and such not to mention more women to run for office things like that. Also hopes in ending human trafficing and such. But I also agree men suffer as well and we should look out for ourselves as well as women and work together! Sex possitive feminists anyway not only because I like sex but because they seem to be rather rational and level headed for sure and aren't like those radicals who seem mean and irate.

are sex positive feminist even accepted by other feminist.
so,you like a branch of feminism.

Well? they seem to be more level headed than others and argue that porn is ok as well as stripping and such like a man can enjoy seeing a woman naked and not objectify her etc. I mean a few of the other branches I think are batshit crazy but it has taught me something not all feminists are the same.

well,do these sex positive feminist call single men ''loser''
Call men ''dangerous and creepy'''

Nope.

I learned a lot and was able to get answers to questions I been wanting to find out that were getting to me for a long time from a sex possitive feminist and it has changed my perception of things somewhat. I just know for sure sex possitive feminists seem pretty cool. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYV-zgbWW_c[/youtube]

are you sure sex positive feminist are feminist?
are they actual part of mainstream feminist?

Well? They are still pretty new and a lot of other feminists oppose their views on sexuality a lot but they still identify as feminists and arent so angry and hostile all the time but they do get falsely accused of working for the MRA because of their views.

ok,watch alot of your sex positive feminist video,she
basically sounds like a typical liberal woman.

sex positive feminist=liberal women

mr.Aspie you and your new sex positive feminist
friends are more or less similar to anti feminist liberals.

Liberals against feminism.

Ok you lost me!

sex positive feminist=Liberals.
Your a Liberal,AspieOtaku.

Ahh ok heh yes! And I support equality whether men or women although I still do frown upon the way other feminists act hostile, go batshit crazy and shame men for no reason and whine....some of them well? seem to be ok and aren't about all that man bashing stuff and maybe we should team up with the ones against that man bashing stuff in order for equality to work.

Im not a liberal but as long as you fight against male
bashing feminist,I'll support you 100%.

Well? I am male and I am proud of being male and I should be! If any non male tells me I should be ashamed of being male should piss off! But then again women shouldn't be ashamed of being women either!

I found this article on the Voice for Men website:

Danielle D’Entremont, Bellwether?

In it the author says:

Returning to current events, now in the news is a Queen’s University student, allegedly assaulted by an unknown man who, according to the “victim” knew her name; Danielle d’Entremont.

The Mainstream reporting of this event is presently drawing conclusions that d’Entremont’s activism as a campus feminist, and her efforts to silence academic speakers on men’s human rights issues, may be related to her alleged assault. Apparently, d’Entremont’s participation in a campus feminist effort to shut down a men’s human rights issues awareness group may also be a contributing factor.

The Huffpo reporting on the story even includes, almost like a bonus a throw-away comment about allegations of sexual assault, made against members of the men’s hockey team. There might even be an actual sexual assault in there somewhere. Unfortunately, in the climate enthusiastic consent, yes-means-no if she changed her mind later, and of a-rapist-in-every-closet-and-under-every-bed, it’s hard read about on-campus rape accusations and take them seriously.

But if some pea-brain fancying himself a champion of men’s human rights indeed was responsible for her chipped tooth and allegedly punched face, that hypothetical amateur pugilist will see the entire Men’s Rights Movement turn against him. I’ll be one of them.

However, most men’s human rights activists paying attention to this case believe that If Danielle d’Entremont was actually assaulted, it was almost certainly somebody with a history of her antagonism and abuse, and straightforward intolerant bigotry by d’Entremont driving their assault. Maybe Danielle’s participation in campus though policing and censorship contributed, maybe not.

But what if something else is happening?

What if our society has begun, under the smog of sex-selective feminist jurisprudence and justice to seek redress of grievance by avenues not within the law? If the law has ceased to provide reliable justice based on social caste, then eventually, groups held in contempt by law, treated as unworthy of protection from victimization will address grievances by other means. - John Hembling

This is in response to an incident about which I previously posted:

Campus Violence and Gender Issues

I find Hembling's response (especially that in bold) to be disconcerting. He seems to be suggesting that men need to become violent in order to protect their rights and that the attacker may have been justified. Have we really reached this point?