Raptor wrote:
If the Pakistanis would just take the gloves off and deal with the Taliban themselves we wouldn't need to bother with drone strikes.
Say Cambodia or Laos wants Kissinger extradited for war crimes. Or Pakistan wants Bush or Obama for the extrajudicial killing of a toddler. Because that's what it is, no matter what euphemisms it's dressed up in. Extradition is refused. Would you say those countries would be justified in applying your argument and send drones? If not, why not?
Raptor wrote:
Maybe we should just do away with drone strikes over northern Pakistan and instead invade and occupy the damn place and see if they like that any better.
I think we are unlikely to agree on the moral issues involved, so here is something pragmatic that might interest you. The jihadis first got funding and training to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. The expense hastened the collapse of the Soviet Union. You think it couldn't happen to the USA? What are the costs of the Afghan and Iraq wars, compared to, say, the credit crunch? Can the country afford another war?
I also get the impression that Pakistan's military and its intelligence service already has a proportion of people who like the Taliban better than the USA. The assassinations by drone are already increasing resentment. Would you like to make sure the next generation is overwhelmingly hostile to the USA? At some point, they will be the people with access to Pakistan's nukes. Should an American patriot advocate such a policy?