An issue for feminists?

Post Reply New Topic

It just occurred to me that antibiotic resistent bacteria would be especially hard on women, given the difference that those drugs have made in the risks of pregnancy. But while there are articles purporting to show the 'women's perspective' on just about every other topic, I can't find much written on this one.

Thread locked as the topic appears to be nonsense.

Thread unlocked again as the OP has explained his reasons for posting it and they seem reasonable enough to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Thanks TallyMan.

I should have been clearer about why I directed it to feminists. From my explanation:

"(a) I'd read about antibiotics being used preventively during childbirth, which I assume wouldn't be done if it weren't important to ensure the safety of the mother or child. (b) I knew that it's somewhat common for a newborn to become stuck in the birth canal, and that it can be deadly. (My father was taught how to perform "partial birth abortions," not as a birth control method, but to save the life of the mother in those cases. The alternative is a major operation that cuts the pelvis open. Doing that without antibiotics seems spooky.) (c) I considered that the risk of infection might actually be gender-equal. Since I'd already estimated that the risk during childbirth would be high, I looked for higher risks among men that might balance that out. I thought of two - sports and work - which used to account for higher mortality in young men. Since the social trends seem to be toward gender-equal sports participation, and away from dangerous manual labor, neither seemed likely to balance out the risks to women mentioned above."

The stories that I'd heard about complicated births from before penicillin sounded at least as bad as the horror stories about illegal abortions.

That's why I thought that it might be of particular interest to women's groups.

I looked to see if it were covered elsewhere already. I found one article that came close, but it dealt only with UTIs (which men also get). Other than that, I found articles on generic women's sites that covered antibiotic resistant bacteria, but all of them were taken from AP and other wire services. They were very general, and none asked which groups would be most impacted.

So what you are trying to find out is if feminists would be even more troubled by disease resistant antibiotics than men? I think it troubles both groups equally due to the fact anyone can get sick.

I think antibiotic resistant bacteria suck for everyone. I dont think it's really a feminist issue, but I'm not a feminist, so I dont know. It's not as if anything can be done about it anyway.

I dont think thats a feminists issue more of just a womans reproductive health issue where stronger vaccines should be implemented to remedy the antibiotic resistant bacteria. Microbes mutate and become new strains so new strains of vaccines should be made.

I'm not really sure what it is you are asking.

Feminism is about society. Bacteria doesn't care or think of society.

Whilst this might be a subject of a women's issue. It is not specifically a feminist issue (unless there was some conspiracy you are suggesting)

Btw the risk in pregnancy whilst a good point, isn't fundamentally different to the risks after pregnancy.

The subject of sepsis is in part related to the mechanics of the anatomy, and there is not a lot that can be done about that other than prevention.

Generally we speak of young an old as vulnerable to infection. But there are actually some deceases that target 20 somethings more, or middle aged and not young an old.