So the new shift in policy is to make mortgages easier to obtain (removing many down payment requirements put in place after the housing market bust) and to reduce (in some cases remove) the liability of lenders in terms of making responsible lending decisions. What could possibly go wrong?
Some of the more recent information:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fannie-freddie-20140514-story.html#page=1
Quote:
By keeping Fannie and Freddie on course, Mel Watt, the new director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, essentially announced a major shift in direction for the bailed-out companies, one that ensures they will keep playing the main role in housing finance for the foreseeable future.
Watt, the first Democrat to run the agency under President Obama, said Tuesday that he would not force Fannie and Freddie to reduce the limits on loans they buy or guarantee as the previous regulator had indicated.
In addition, he said the agency was taking steps to loosen mortgage credit by easing standards on when banks could be forced to buy back some loans sold to Fannie and Freddie.
"Mel Watt just made it easier to get a home," said Ed Mills, a policy analyst at FBR Capital Markets.
Quote:
There is broad agreement that Fannie and Freddie should be replaced, and House and Senate lawmakers are working on legislation to do that as part of an overhaul of the housing finance system.
The Senate Banking Committee is expected to pass an overhaul bill Thursday, but it appears unlikely that it will make it through Congress this year.
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche