techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Sometimes I think we waste our time asking such questions. Quantity and quality will always be a struggle here anyway - ie. Mao Tsetung and BTK killed people in different manners - one killed far far far more people, the other took his victim's lives with much more artful and meticulous sadism.
.
If the OP is just venting about how upset he is upon hearing about the crime in the news- its understandable.
But if you take his OP seriously as a question- then I agree with you- that its an inane question.
There is a limit to how good good things can be. But there is no limit to how bad bad things can get.
Second- it gets to be peaches and pears.
Who is worse: a serial killer, or an embezzler? Normally you might say a "serial killer". But if the embezzler in question is Bernie Madoff who "made off" with billions, and stole little old ladies' life savings, and ruined many lives, then you might well argue that Bernie Madoff was comparable in awefulness to Jeffrey Daumier, or Ted Bundy, or Jack the Ripper. But even then its a very different kind of evil so its peaches and pears to compare madoff to Daumier (say). Is he worse than Ted Bundy but a little lower than Daumier? Lets ask the judges on dancing with the Stars to give him a score!